[geeklog-devel] GL2 License

[Tony Bibbs]

I say dual license.  This would force us to take all community based 
contributions and rewrite them into GL2 (ala MySQL) but it gives us 
flexiblity.  The only thing I want to prevent is ISP's leeching from us 
by offering GL2 as a service offering and not giving anything back.  I'm 
not saying they have to give money (which would be nice) but hosting 
(like pair does now) or some other value add for the project would be nice.

Just my two cents.

--Tony

Vincent Furia wrote:

>We should decide on a license now, before we get into any serious
>coding (I know, too late for Tony).  I'd like to see us use the LGPL,
>assuming there is no conflict with using the LGPL with PHP licensed
>code (I don't think there is one).  Plugins of course could be
>licensed however the developer see fits.
>
>Of course if no one else wants to go the LGPL route I'd accept a PHP
>style license. Other licenses will be considered on a case by case
>basis.
>
>-Vinny
>_______________________________________________
>geeklog-devel mailing list
>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>  
>