[geeklog-devel] 1.3.10 to do list

[Tony Bibbs]

I'll get it in as soon as I get it.

--Tony

Tom Willett wrote:

>I was supposed to change the spamx plugin to use sql tables rather than 
>files.  I am almost done with that and will get it to Tony in the next 
>couple of days.
>
>--
>Tom Willett
>tomw at pigstye.net
>
>---------- Original Message -----------
>From: Tony Bibbs <tony at tonybibbs.com>
>To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>Sent: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:51:00 -0500
>Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] 1.3.10 to do list
>
>  
>
>>Dirk Haun wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Inclusion of the SpamX plugin - what's the status here? We probably need
>>>a new plugin API function so that plugins can filter or reject comments
>>>before they will be saved. Also, a method to make it easier to package
>>>plugins with Geeklog would be nice, e.g. by making the install script
>>>read the SQL for the plugin from some predefined directory (if we do
>>>that, it also needs to be able to handle plugin updates).
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I say add something like the following:
>>PLG_preSaveComment_<pluginName>
>>PLG_postSaveComment_<pluginName>
>>PLG_preSaveStory_<pluginName>
>>PLG_postSaveStory_<pluginName>
>>
>>The first one is the one we needed the most.  I figured adding a 
>>postSaveComment would complete the cycle, though, I can't think of an 
>>immediate use for it now.  I also added the two story-related methods as 
>>I don't think it would be a stretch to think someone may want those at 
>>some point.  Just a suggestion...we can simply add the one and worry 
>>about the rest as needed...I just figured we might try being a bit more 
>>proactive by adding a few more.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>PDF: Currently, the PDF-related files all produce XHTML, which is
>>>inconsistent with the rest of Geeklog which produces plain ol' HTML. From
>>>the documentation, the PDF add-on doesn't understand XHTML either (but
>>>only HTML 3.2), so I don't see the need for this. Tony? Anything else
>>>that needs to be done on the PDF support?
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Agreed, I misunderstood that much.  With that, nothing else is really 
>>needed then.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>A few features have been mentioned in the past as being possibly ready to
>>>go into the next release. Most notably spell checking and archiving of
>>>old stories. Tony, Blaine - any updates?
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Count the spellchecker out.  I've dusted it off and have a few fairly 
>>big bugs that will take some time...not worth holding off the .10 release.
>>
>>--Tony
>>_______________________________________________
>>geeklog-devel mailing list
>>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>    
>>
>------- End of Original Message -------
>
>_______________________________________________
>geeklog-devel mailing list
>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>  
>