From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 2 16:56:08 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:56:08 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Editable story IDs In-Reply-To: <20040829195045.28096@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040829195045.28096@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20040902215608.6784@smtp.haun-online.de> I wrote: >Heavy testing and feedback welcome ... Found 2 bugs myself: There was a '$' missing in front of a variable name in admin/story.php and changing an existing story's ID did not update the story's ID in the article_images table (so the images weren't found any more). This could really use some testing, it seems. Anyone? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 2 17:12:05 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:12:05 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again Message-ID: <20040902221205.26565@smtp.haun-online.de> Guys, I've installed the CVS code on my normal webspace today for the first time. So I don't have that much control over that setup as I have elsewhere. I found a couple of issues with the HTTP session stuff that annoyed me 1. I usually use the PEAR installed on the server, not the local copy. Since the HTTP sessions are in beta, they are not part of a standard PEAR install and I have to use the PEAR classes that we ship with Geeklog. Something is wrong with our approach here. The PEAR guys are pretty picky (ask Tony), so when they haven't released HTTP session yet, there must be a reason for this. Plus I can foresee the support issues this extra class will cause us. 2. When browsing the site in Lynx, I was asked twice to accept cookies. Once for www.example.com and once for .example.com. The latter is normal - that's for Geeklog's cookies. The former must come from the HTTP sessions class then and it seems to be using a different domain name. Is this configurable in the sessions class? Otherwise, it'll add an extra level of annoyance for people who are picky about cookies (like myself ...). 3. When validating the HTML of my site, the validator complained (and rightly so) about session IDs that were inserted in the HTML! Since the W3C validator, , doesn't accept cookies the session code seems to fall back to using session IDs in the URLs, e.g. .../index.php?topic=music&SessionID=vp4137881690fd2 The problem here is that (as part of a link) it should read & SessionID=... This is actually a configuration issue in php.ini, but on shared web hosting, you often don't have the permissions to change that. Why is the sessions class injecting session IDs in the code anyway? Is this configurable? Overall, I have to say that I'm not too pleased with the current state. I'm actually pretty close to ripping it out of CVS again. I see the potential benefits for using PHP sessions, but something about our current approach seems to be wrong ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Thu Sep 2 17:49:55 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:49:55 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again In-Reply-To: <20040902221205.26565@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040902221205.26565@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <41379583.4020907@tonybibbs.com> Dirk Haun wrote: > <>Guys, > > I've installed the CVS code on my normal webspace today for the first > time. So I don't have that much control over that setup as I have > elsewhere. I found a couple of issues with the HTTP session stuff that > annoyed me > > 1. I usually use the PEAR installed on the server, not the local copy. > Since the HTTP sessions are in beta, they are not part of a standard PEAR > install and I have to use the PEAR classes that we ship with Geeklog. > Something is wrong with our approach here. The PEAR guys are pretty picky > (ask Tony), so when they haven't released HTTP session yet, there must be > a reason for this. Plus I can foresee the support issues this extra class > will cause us. The code base for this is small. That said, I can probably get some of the bug fixes I have already implemented into it and re-release it. Another option is to simply write our own session handler which is quite trivial (even for storing stuff in a database). That way you get rid of the PEAR requirement and give lib-sessions a much needed upgrade. Regardless, I think the session handling in Geeklog is archaic at best and needs revamping. Whether we do it here now or in a another release is up to you guys. > <> > 2. When browsing the site in Lynx, I was asked twice to accept cookies. > Once for www.example.com and once for .example.com. The latter is normal > - that's for Geeklog's cookies. The former must come from the HTTP > sessions class then and it seems to be using a different domain name. > > Is this configurable in the sessions class? Otherwise, it'll add an extra > level of annoyance for people who are picky about cookies (like myself > ...). I'll double check on this. Again, small code base so fixing this isn't an issue. I'm assuming the write you are seeing is when it is writing the Session ID to the cookie, right? That's the only thing I can think of. > <> > 3. When validating the HTML of my site, the validator complained (and > rightly so) about session IDs that were inserted in the HTML! Since the > W3C validator, , doesn't accept cookies the > session code seems to fall back to using session IDs in the URLs, e.g. > > .../index.php?topic=music&SessionID=vp4137881690fd2 > > The problem here is that (as part of a link) it should read & > SessionID=... This is actually a configuration issue in php.ini, but on > shared web hosting, you often don't have the permissions to change that. > > Why is the sessions class injecting session IDs in the code anyway? Is > this configurable? Again, small code base. It's probably as easy as ripping out the IF logic that enables that. > <> > > Overall, I have to say that I'm not too pleased with the current state. > I'm actually pretty close to ripping it out of CVS again. I'm less pessimestic. I think with all the changes and the register_globals stuff we should take our time, call this release 1.4 and move on. In fact, I'd say we could probably have something we haven't had in a while, a beta release. Just a suggestion. I'll work with Blaine on the session stuff and see if we can't get it all ironed out. If you decide to rip it out of CVS, please give a heads up so I can bring a copy down just prior. In the meantime I'll be busy getting the to-do items off my plate over this holiday weekend. --Tony From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Sep 3 16:46:40 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:46:40 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Re: [geeklog-cvs] geeklog-1.3/public_html comment.php,1.74,1.75 lib-common.php,1.370,1.371 In-Reply-To: <20040903195958.6C3ED3D289@tonybibbs.com> References: <20040903195958.6C3ED3D289@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040903214640.6953@smtp.haun-online.de> >Index: lib-common.php >=================================================================== >RCS file: /var/cvs/geeklog-1.3/public_html/lib-common.php,v >retrieving revision 1.370 >retrieving revision 1.371 >diff -C2 -d -r1.370 -r1.371 [...] >! require_once( '/path/to/geeklog/config.php' ); [...] >! require_once( '/srv/www/htdocs/geeklog-1.3/config.php' ); Removed this change from CVS as well ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 5 06:07:22 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:07:22 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again In-Reply-To: <41379583.4020907@tonybibbs.com> References: <41379583.4020907@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040905110722.28590@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony, >Regardless, I think the session handling in Geeklog is archaic at best >and needs revamping. No doubts about that. >I'm less pessimestic. I think with all the changes and the >register_globals stuff we should take our time, call this release 1.4 >and move on. I'm not pessimistic, I was just annoyed. I agree that Geeklog's session handling needs an overhaul. But this isn't something that we should rush. I agreed to adding the HTTP_Sessions code on the assumption that it wouldn't break anything, but that turned out not to be the case. So I've removed it from CVS again now and say we make that our #1 priority for the next release after 1.3.10. >If you decide to rip it out of CVS, please give a heads up so I >can bring a copy down just prior. It's only 3 lines of code anyway: >I'm assuming the write you are seeing is when it is writing >the Session ID to the cookie, right? That's the only thing I can think of. Yep. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog at langfamily.ca Sun Sep 5 11:14:03 2004 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 11:14:03 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again References: <41379583.4020907@tonybibbs.com> <20040905110722.28590@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <006a01c4935a$fab4f740$1f12fea9@XPBL2> Why don't we just use the core PHP Session functions - that was my original intention all along. There will still be a browser session based cookie. SESSION Based files will be the current only option We can have a Config Parm to disable sessions which can be off by default for now Blaine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dirk Haun" To: Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 6:07 AM Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again Tony, >Regardless, I think the session handling in Geeklog is archaic at best >and needs revamping. No doubts about that. >I'm less pessimestic. I think with all the changes and the >register_globals stuff we should take our time, call this release 1.4 >and move on. I'm not pessimistic, I was just annoyed. I agree that Geeklog's session handling needs an overhaul. But this isn't something that we should rush. I agreed to adding the HTTP_Sessions code on the assumption that it wouldn't break anything, but that turned out not to be the case. So I've removed it from CVS again now and say we make that our #1 priority for the next release after 1.3.10. >If you decide to rip it out of CVS, please give a heads up so I >can bring a copy down just prior. It's only 3 lines of code anyway: >I'm assuming the write you are seeing is when it is writing >the Session ID to the cookie, right? That's the only thing I can think of. Yep. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel From mathfox at xs4all.nl Sun Sep 5 12:13:55 2004 From: mathfox at xs4all.nl (Peter Roozemaal) Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 18:13:55 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again In-Reply-To: <006a01c4935a$fab4f740$1f12fea9@XPBL2> References: <41379583.4020907@tonybibbs.com> <20040905110722.28590@smtp.haun-online.de> <006a01c4935a$fab4f740$1f12fea9@XPBL2> Message-ID: <413B3B43.6040805@xs4all.nl> Blaine Lang wrote: > Why don't we just use the core PHP Session functions - that was my > original intention all along. > > There will still be a browser session based cookie. SESSION Based > files will be the current only option We can have a Config Parm to > disable sessions which can be off by default for now There are serious problems with the combination of session files and load-balanced web servers. In essence, it requires a shared file server and creates another point of failure. Database stored session info is more natural for our setup. Greetings, Peter. From geeklog at langfamily.ca Sun Sep 5 12:24:53 2004 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:24:53 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again References: <41379583.4020907@tonybibbs.com> <20040905110722.28590@smtp.haun-online.de> <006a01c4935a$fab4f740$1f12fea9@XPBL2> <413B3B43.6040805@xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <000c01c49364$e01e6ec0$1f12fea9@XPBL2> Peter wrote: > There are serious problems with the combination of session files and > load-balanced web servers. Yes, that is true and I have clients that I used PHP SESSIONS in such an environment and they typically do have the infrastructure to support SESSION based files. The number of Geeklog installs that run in such an environment are probally .001%. Are we to not consider moving forward because this and we are not making any core changes to require sessions at this time. I have GL based client plugins that now use sessions and it obviously is a positive development. I personally just think we should include the PEAR library as it's pretty small for now. I want to move forward not backward and we are not making any core changes at this time to require sessions. I suggest adding a $_CONF parm that is off by default. If enabled it will load the PEAR class and initiate sessions. Otherwise - let's use the PHP Sessions - again with the $_CONF parm. Blaine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Roozemaal" To: Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Sessions, again Blaine Lang wrote: > Why don't we just use the core PHP Session functions - that was my > original intention all along. > > There will still be a browser session based cookie. SESSION Based > files will be the current only option We can have a Config Parm to > disable sessions which can be off by default for now There are serious problems with the combination of session files and load-balanced web servers. In essence, it requires a shared file server and creates another point of failure. Database stored session info is more natural for our setup. Greetings, Peter. _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Sep 7 13:23:51 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:23:51 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] portal.php and Google Message-ID: <20040907182351.32471@smtp.haun-online.de> Now here's an interesting effect of Geeklog's portal.php that I haven't noticed before. A Google search for a certain musician brings up, amongst others, this result: CD Baby: VANESSA PETERS: Sparkler - hear and buy it at CD BABY. Vanessa Peters Sparkler ... 2003 Vanessa Peters. CD List price: $16.94. CD Baby Price: $11.99 ADD TO CART. IN STOCK. ORDER NOW. Will ship within 24 hours! ... www.handful-of-sparks.de/portal.php/link/20040827211701114 - 21k - 5 Sep 2004 The URL is from the links section of one of my sites, but the contents are not (the actual URL is ). This probably has to do with a change introduced in Geeklog 1.3.9: portal.php is now using header('Location: ...') to do the redirect instead of the Meta refresh that earlier versions were using. Not sure if this should be considered a feature or a bug. While the owner of the Geeklog site may like it, the owner of the linked site most probably won't like it that much ... Thoughts? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.handful-of-sparks.de/ From slord at marelina.com Wed Sep 8 08:29:31 2004 From: slord at marelina.com (Simon Lord) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 08:29:31 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Story Tags Message-ID: I've been trying to add a form to a story for a day now with little success. GL keeps striping out my code despite my having updated the config.php file with the following: 'div' => array('class' => 1, 'id' => 1, 'style' => 1), 'form' => array('class' => 1, 'target' => 1, 'action' => 1, 'method' => 1), 'input' => array('class' => 1, 'type' => 1, 'name' => 1, 'value' => 1, 'src' => 1, 'alt' => 1, 'border' => 1), ... As you can see I'm also trying to get DIV and INPUT options to work as well but all three gets stripped to the bone when I Preview or Save my story. Any suggestions? Sincerely, Simon From slord at marelina.com Thu Sep 9 16:42:14 2004 From: slord at marelina.com (Simon Lord) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:42:14 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Story Tags In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello? On Sep 8, 2004, at 8:29 AM, Simon Lord wrote: > I've been trying to add a form to a story for a day now with little > success. GL keeps striping out my code despite my having updated the > config.php file with the following: > > 'div' => array('class' => 1, 'id' => 1, 'style' => 1), > 'form' => array('class' => 1, 'target' => 1, 'action' => 1, 'method' > => 1), > 'input' => array('class' => 1, 'type' => 1, 'name' => 1, 'value' => 1, > 'src' => 1, 'alt' => 1, 'border' => 1), > > ... As you can see I'm also trying to get DIV and INPUT options to > work as well but all three gets stripped to the bone when I Preview or > Save my story. > > Any suggestions? > > Sincerely, > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > Sincerely, Simon From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 9 16:53:55 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:53:55 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Story Tags In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20040909215355.19593@smtp.haun-online.de> Simon wrote: >Hello? Well, it's usually a good idea not too respond too quickly to your posts, as there's usually a "forget it, I'm stupid" follow up coming within a few hours ;-) >> I've been trying to add a form to a story for a day now with little >> success. GL keeps striping out my code despite my having updated the >> config.php file with the following: Works for me (straight copy of your additions, although
is already there in the default config.php). bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From slord at marelina.com Thu Sep 9 17:17:49 2004 From: slord at marelina.com (Simon Lord) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:17:49 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Story Tags In-Reply-To: <20040909215355.19593@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040909215355.19593@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: > Works for me (straight copy of your additions, although
is > already > there in the default config.php). Egg on my face, works here too. I had been updating an older site - the client moved the site to another location and I was still login into the old site. :P Sincerely, Simon From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 12 06:10:32 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:10:32 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] SpamX plugin - inital blacklist Message-ID: <20040912111032.20072@smtp.haun-online.de> I've finally gotten around to try a fresh install of the current CVS version. It seems like there are a few files missing, which I'm going to add (from Tom's original plugin release) as soon as CVS is working again ... My actual question is about the default 'MTBlacklist' entries in the database, i.e. in mysql_tableanddata.php and in the update file. Do we really need those? Couldn't those simply be retrieved from the MT- Blacklist via the "Update MT-Blacklist" entry in the plugin? Apart from the sheer amount of entries, I'm not quite comfortable with the idea of carrying URLs of bestiality sites around in our source code ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Sep 13 14:13:14 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:13:14 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS back up Message-ID: <4145E33A.1050704@tonybibbs.com> Ok, here is what I learned. First, I was patching the server a few days ago. Nothing directly related to CVS but during the process the original /etc/group got overwritten. I thought I had forgotten the root password but it turns out because of not belonging to wheel, I couldn't su to root. Long story short, I had to ssh in as root (which I never usually do) and add the cvs_group back along with the assigned users. That said, it is fixed. --Tony From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Sep 13 14:39:00 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:39:00 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS back up In-Reply-To: <4145E33A.1050704@tonybibbs.com> References: <4145E33A.1050704@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040913193900.26542@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony, >That said, it is fixed. Unfortunately not :-( cvs update: failed to create lock directory for `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' (/ var/cvs/geeklog-1.3/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs update: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' cvs [update aborted]: read lock failed - giving up bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Sep 13 14:44:41 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:44:41 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS back up In-Reply-To: <20040913193900.26542@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <4145E33A.1050704@tonybibbs.com> <20040913193900.26542@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <4145EA99.7030205@tonybibbs.com> Yeah, it was because I put "daun" insted of "dhaun" in /etc/group. Try again. --Tony Dirk Haun wrote: >Tony, > > > >>That said, it is fixed. >> >> > >Unfortunately not :-( > >cvs update: failed to create lock directory for `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' (/ >var/cvs/geeklog-1.3/#cvs.lock): Permission denied >cvs update: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' >cvs [update aborted]: read lock failed - giving up > >bye, Dirk > > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Sep 13 14:55:50 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:55:50 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS back up In-Reply-To: <4145EA99.7030205@tonybibbs.com> References: <4145EA99.7030205@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040913195550.23726@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony wrote: >Yeah, it was because I put "daun" insted of "dhaun" in /etc/group. Try >again. Ah, that's better :-) Thanks, Tony! bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Sep 13 23:29:52 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:29:52 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] System patching started Message-ID: <414665B0.7090705@tonybibbs.com> While I was in patching things I've decided to do a system-wide update on the server hosting CVS. This affects 77 packages, all of which will be compiled from source and will probably take some time. If you notice performance issues, it will more than likely be because the CPU's will be nearly pegged at 100% during some compilations. After this is done I plan to finally upgrade project.geeklog.net to use the latest stable gForge software which will be followed by finally configuring postfix for mail. I'm saving the mail portion for last as that requires migrating all the mailman stuff and moving the archives over. Fire over any questions, if any. --Tony From geeklog at langfamily.ca Mon Sep 13 23:46:20 2004 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:46:20 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] System patching started References: <414665B0.7090705@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <018201c49a0d$65ebefb0$650a10ac@XPBL2> Sounds like a lot of work. Tony what do you use to generate the diff's we get in the CVS notifications. I am setting up a linux CVS server. Blaine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Bibbs" To: "Geeklog Development" ; Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:29 PM Subject: [geeklog-devel] System patching started While I was in patching things I've decided to do a system-wide update on the server hosting CVS. This affects 77 packages, all of which will be compiled from source and will probably take some time. If you notice performance issues, it will more than likely be because the CPU's will be nearly pegged at 100% during some compilations. After this is done I plan to finally upgrade project.geeklog.net to use the latest stable gForge software which will be followed by finally configuring postfix for mail. I'm saving the mail portion for last as that requires migrating all the mailman stuff and moving the archives over. Fire over any questions, if any. --Tony _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Sep 14 00:10:05 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:10:05 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] project.geeklog.net database Message-ID: <41466F1D.7030908@tonybibbs.com> The project database will be temporarily unavailable. Gentoo's portage system requires that I back up all databases (gl2_gforge) and remove the database directory (/var/lib/postgresql). I have preformed the update and copied it to my server at home just in case something really bad happens (doubtful). I will bring it back up as soon as the updates complete. --Tony From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Sep 14 01:58:58 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:58:58 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS back up In-Reply-To: <20040913195550.23726@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040913195550.23726@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20040914065858.18083@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony, the cronjob for the nightly tarball had the same problem: cvs update: failed to create lock directory for `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' (/ var/cvs/geeklog-1.3/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs update: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' cvs [update aborted]: read lock failed - giving up It's doing an anonymous checkout. Can you check that, please? Thanks. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Sep 14 10:05:38 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:05:38 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS back up In-Reply-To: <20040914065858.18083@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040913195550.23726@smtp.haun-online.de> <20040914065858.18083@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <4146FAB2.9040903@tonybibbs.com> K, fixed. I even tested to ensure anonymous couldn't write. --Tony Dirk Haun wrote: >Tony, > >the cronjob for the nightly tarball had the same problem: > >cvs update: failed to create lock directory for `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' (/ >var/cvs/geeklog-1.3/#cvs.lock): Permission denied >cvs update: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/var/cvs/geeklog-1.3' >cvs [update aborted]: read lock failed - giving up > >It's doing an anonymous checkout. Can you check that, please? Thanks. > >bye, Dirk > > > > From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Sep 14 10:15:12 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:15:12 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mail temporarily down Message-ID: <4146FCF0.5060306@tonybibbs.com> The CVS server will not be able to send email starting now and going until I get postfix up-to-date. I will notify everyone when it is back up. --Tony From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Sep 14 11:39:06 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:39:06 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mail temporarily down In-Reply-To: <4146FCF0.5060306@tonybibbs.com> References: <4146FCF0.5060306@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <4147109A.1010801@tonybibbs.com> Mail should be available now. --Tony Tony Bibbs wrote: > The CVS server will not be able to send email starting now and going > until I get postfix up-to-date. I will notify everyone when it is > back up. > > --Tony > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Sep 14 13:52:36 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:52:36 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Re: [geeklog-devtalk] Initial MT-Blacklist In-Reply-To: <41466A94.7010206@tonybibbs.com> References: <41466A94.7010206@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040914185236.3142@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony, >Note to self (and list). I still need to update the upgrade scripts to >include the spamx data structures. > >Maybe this week while I'm on the kick of updating sh*t. I could take care of that, if you want. I'd rather see you work on the PDF stuff, to be honest ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Wed Sep 15 12:59:42 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:59:42 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Update on project site and CVS Message-ID: <414874FE.1090001@tonybibbs.com> Ok, long story. The patch to postgres required that I dump all databases and restore them after they were back up. This effectively forced a new installation of postgres. Like an idiot I backed up to a file on / which filled up the partition and should have been the cause of the CVS problems. I have since moved the file to /var which has over 40GB of space. Please verify CVS is working properly (I'm in meetings). I'm also in the process of restoring the gForge database. I'll post when it is back up. --Tony From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Sep 15 13:54:47 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:54:47 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Update on project site and CVS In-Reply-To: <414874FE.1090001@tonybibbs.com> References: <414874FE.1090001@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040915185447.9141@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony, >Please verify CVS is working properly (I'm in meetings). Looks good to me. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Wed Sep 15 14:09:48 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:09:48 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Update on project site and CVS In-Reply-To: <20040915185447.9141@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <414874FE.1090001@tonybibbs.com> <20040915185447.9141@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <4148856C.3020807@tonybibbs.com> Project site is now back up as well. Note to self, you have to tell postgres to accept tcp/ip sockets in the postgresql.conf and make sure the localhost can connect by editing pg_hba.conf. --Tony Dirk Haun wrote: >Tony, > > > >>Please verify CVS is working properly (I'm in meetings). >> >> > >Looks good to me. > >bye, Dirk > > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Sep 17 15:13:03 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:13:03 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Re: [geeklog-cvs] geeklog-1.3/public_html/admin story.php,1.132,1.133 In-Reply-To: <20040917105240.6C07C5394A@iowaoutdoors> References: <20040917105240.6C07C5394A@iowaoutdoors> Message-ID: <20040917201303.14398@smtp.haun-online.de> >Modified Files: > story.php >Log Message: >Added missing bits and pieces for installing the SpamX plugin during >database update. Whoops - that change doesn't have anything to do with the SpamX plugin, of course. But it doesn't hurt, so I left it in ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Sep 18 15:09:46 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:09:46 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] SpamX upgrade test Message-ID: <20040918200947.27556@smtp.haun-online.de> Does anyone have a 1.3.9 install with Tom's original SpamX plugin and could try upgrading that to the CVS version? I've already tested fresh installs, upgrading from 1.3.9 without the plugin, and installing / uninstalling the (included) plugin. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Sep 18 15:28:01 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:28:01 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] A lesson to learn from Mambo? Message-ID: <20040918202801.18866@smtp.haun-online.de> There's an interesting article on Slashdot about a dispute over a piece of code in the Mambo CMS: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/18/1348255 Apparently, one of the Mambo developers made a modification for a customer (and was paid for it). Since he liked that feature, he re- implemented (and extended) it and added it to the Mambo distribution. Now the customer is p*ssed and threatens all the Mambo users(!) with lawsuits and whatnot. Even though the customer is obviously overreacting (and, it seems, wrong), this is something those of us who are doing custom work on Geeklog should be careful about. Please, everbody, check with your customers before you add any custom code to the Geeklog core. bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Sun Sep 19 14:00:55 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:00:55 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [Fwd: Re: One of Your Web Site.] Message-ID: <414DC957.9050807@tonybibbs.com> Anybody know who this idiot is? --Tony -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: One of Your Web Site. Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:38:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Dave Weis To: admin at weblink4all.com References: <4037.4.26.144.69.1095461438.squirrel at 4.26.144.69> Thanks for your strange email. I only provide hosting to Geeklog, I can't help you with your computer problems. Please don't email again. Thanks dave On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 admin at weblink4all.com wrote: > Hi, > > This Web site name www.geeklog.net mess up my Web Site. The Program they > have they won't support it at all. I don't think that is fair at all. They > have support in there. They won't give it to you. I don't think they need > to be doing that at all. They charge for no good programs. > > -- Dave Weis djweis at internetsolver.com http://www.internetsolver.com/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Sun Sep 19 14:01:21 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:01:21 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [Fwd: One of Your Web Site. (fwd)] Message-ID: <414DC971.4030209@tonybibbs.com> Here is another from the same idiot --Tony -------- Original Message -------- Subject: One of Your Web Site. (fwd) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:38:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Dave Weis To: Tony Bibbs 2nd one -- Dave Weis djweis at internetsolver.com http://www.internetsolver.com/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:50:38 -0400 (EDT) From: admin at weblink4all.com To: sales at internetsolver.com Subject: One of Your Web Site. Hi, This Web site name www.geeklog.net mess up my Web Site. The Program they have they won't support it at all. I don't think that is fair at all. They have support in there. They won't give it to you. I don't think they need to be doing that at all. They charge for no good programs. From tony at tonybibbs.com Sun Sep 19 14:02:17 2004 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:02:17 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [Fwd: About That Web Site. (fwd)] Message-ID: <414DC9A9.5010301@tonybibbs.com> And finally this one. I need to check if this is some sort of hoax or if this is legit. Annoying to say the least. --Tony -------- Original Message -------- Subject: About That Web Site. (fwd) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:39:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Dave Weis To: Tony Bibbs hopefully the last. -- Dave Weis djweis at internetsolver.com http://www.internetsolver.com/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:33:15 -0400 (EDT) From: admin at weblink4all.com To: sales at internetsolver.com Subject: About That Web Site. Hi, I just talk to an Attoney and they said they have to fix it. If not Court time for them. From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 19 14:13:33 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:13:33 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [Fwd: About That Web Site. (fwd)] In-Reply-To: <414DC9A9.5010301@tonybibbs.com> References: <414DC9A9.5010301@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20040919191334.1597@smtp.haun-online.de> >I just talk to an Attoney and they said they have to fix it. If not Court >time for them. Ha, that was a giveaway ... Sounds like our friend "Mandy". See Quote from there: | I just called a Attoney and the Attoney said you guys have to fix it or | be sued. Originally started in this thread: Quick summary: Tried to install the weather plugin, didn't get it to work. Site is apparently down, supposedly unable to recover (already told her to disable the plugin in the database), then started spurting out threats, etc. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From tomw at pigstye.net Tue Sep 21 17:27:51 2004 From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:27:51 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net Message-ID: <20040921212652.M10640@pigstye.net> Just in case the appropriate person does not know. Geeklog.net has been down most of the day giving a sql error. -- Tom Willett tomw at pigstye.net From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Sep 21 17:48:41 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:48:41 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net In-Reply-To: <20040921212652.M10640@pigstye.net> References: <20040921212652.M10640@pigstye.net> Message-ID: <20040921224841.13384@smtp.haun-online.de> >Just in case the appropriate person does not know. Geeklog.net has been >down most of the day giving a sql error. Ouch. Thanks Tom. For those who want to know: The sessions table was corrupted. Haven't looked into it - just came home and am off to bed ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From dwight at trumbower.com Tue Sep 21 21:13:01 2004 From: dwight at trumbower.com (Dwight Trumbower) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:13:01 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net In-Reply-To: <20040921224841.13384@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040921212652.M10640@pigstye.net> <20040921224841.13384@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <4150D19D.6010302@trumbower.com> So what is the best way to tell people. It was down around 10:30am central. Dirk Haun wrote: >>Just in case the appropriate person does not know. Geeklog.net has been >>down most of the day giving a sql error. > > > Ouch. Thanks Tom. > > For those who want to know: The sessions table was corrupted. > > Haven't looked into it - just came home and am off to bed ... > > bye, Dirk > > From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Sep 22 02:15:18 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:15:18 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net In-Reply-To: <4150D19D.6010302@trumbower.com> References: <4150D19D.6010302@trumbower.com> Message-ID: <20040922071518.19288@smtp.haun-online.de> Dwight, >So what is the best way to tell people. It was down around 10:30am central. Good question. 3 people (Tony, Blaine, and myself) have shell access to the gl.net server. The fix itself was trivial and a matter of 2 minutes (check error.log, repair table). So the notification is the problem ... Any suggestions? Usually, I would have noticed the problem soon enough, but I was out yesterday. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From dwight at trumbower.com Wed Sep 22 08:46:17 2004 From: dwight at trumbower.com (dwight at trumbower.com) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:46:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net In-Reply-To: <20040922071518.19288@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <4150D19D.6010302@trumbower.com> <20040922071518.19288@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <1095.68.248.122.121.1095857177.squirrel@www.trumbower.com> I did notify on IRC, both Blaine and IA were there. Though both were probably busy. > Dwight, > >>So what is the best way to tell people. It was down around 10:30am >> central. > > Good question. 3 people (Tony, Blaine, and myself) have shell access to > the gl.net server. The fix itself was trivial and a matter of 2 minutes > (check error.log, repair table). > > So the notification is the problem ... Any suggestions? > > Usually, I would have noticed the problem soon enough, but I was out > yesterday. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://mypod.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Sep 22 17:04:51 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:04:51 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net In-Reply-To: <20040921224841.13384@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20040921224841.13384@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20040922220451.4800@smtp.haun-online.de> I wrote: >For those who want to know: The sessions table was corrupted. > >Haven't looked into it I did now, but couldn't see anything out of the ordinary. At around 12:15 (server time), a shutdown of the database was in progress. Apparently, the entire server was restarted at that point and when it came back up, the sessions table was corrupted ... We have about one server or MySQL restart per month. Not sure why, but it may just be too much traffic or lockups. I'll certainly switch the tables over to InnoDB tables once the site is upgraded to 1.3.10. Maybe that'll help ... Other than that, I can only see the usual bunch of brazilian script kiddies stupidly trying out their exploits (even for the Coppermine gallery ...). I don't think it was one of them, though. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From tomw at pigstye.net Fri Sep 24 20:51:45 2004 From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:51:45 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Minor suggestion for Geeklog Message-ID: <20040925003605.M42687@pigstye.net> I would like to make a minor suggestion that would make upgrades much easier and perhaps could avert a lot of install problems. Have two configuration files. One the normal config.php we are all familiar with. The person installing geeklog should never make changes to this file. The other configuration file would contain things that must be changed and only the configuration options the installer wanted/needed to change. Then the last thing in the normal config.php would be to include the site.config.php file. The changes in the site.config file would override the normal config.php and everything would be good. This has several advantages. To upgrade, normally only minor or no changes would be required to the site config file and the normal config.php would be replaced. No editing required. Most of the paths, which people change when they shouldn't, would remain untouched in the normal config.php. It would remove some of the temptation to mess with them. This would only require the creation of a minimal site.config.php (name it something like site.config.php.example to prevent its overwriting the real site.config.ph) and the include in the normal config.php. Of course you need to place warnings in the config.php to not make any changes in this file. The same idea will work with language files and avert the problem of incomplete language files. Always read the english file and then just overlay it with another language file if wanted. Quick changes to the english file can be made and distributed and it will not break the others. This would only require some simple logic changes in the includes. A minor change that would make things more robust. -- Tom Willett tomw at pigstye.net From vfuria at gmail.com Fri Sep 24 23:32:52 2004 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:32:52 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Minor suggestion for Geeklog In-Reply-To: <20040925003605.M42687@pigstye.net> References: <20040925003605.M42687@pigstye.net> Message-ID: <8319e2d604092420327d6ac7f5@mail.gmail.com> I agree with Tom. At least for config.php. I'd like to see how big an impact in performance there would be before we implemented something like this for languages. -Vinny On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:51:45 +0000, Tom Willett wrote: > I would like to make a minor suggestion that would make upgrades much easier > and perhaps could avert a lot of install problems. > > Have two configuration files. One the normal config.php we are all familiar > with. The person installing geeklog should never make changes to this file. > The other configuration file would contain things that must be changed and > only the configuration options the installer wanted/needed to change. > > Then the last thing in the normal config.php would be to include the > site.config.php file. The changes in the site.config file would override the > normal config.php and everything would be good. This has several advantages. > > To upgrade, normally only minor or no changes would be required to the site > config file and the normal config.php would be replaced. No editing required. > > Most of the paths, which people change when they shouldn't, would remain > untouched in the normal config.php. It would remove some of the temptation > to mess with them. > > This would only require the creation of a minimal site.config.php (name it > something like site.config.php.example to prevent its overwriting the real > site.config.ph) and the include in the normal config.php. Of course you need > to place warnings in the config.php to not make any changes in this file. > > The same idea will work with language files and avert the problem of > incomplete language files. Always read the english file and then just > overlay it with another language file if wanted. Quick changes to the > english file can be made and distributed and it will not break the others. > This would only require some simple logic changes in the includes. > > A minor change that would make things more robust. > > -- > Tom Willett > tomw at pigstye.net > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From vfuria at gmail.com Sat Sep 25 15:55:55 2004 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:55:55 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Comment Deletion Access Message-ID: <8319e2d6040925125516391752@mail.gmail.com> I just realized that Geeklog currently checks if a user has write access to the poll/article and if the user has story.edit permissions to grant comment deletion power. It wouldn't be too difficult to add a comment.moderate or comment.delete access level so that granting a (say Story Admin) access to a story for editing or posting wouldn't necessarily give that user the ability to delete comments. This is something that can probably wait til 1.3.11. I just wanted to get the issue documented and see what people think. -Vinny From vfuria at gmail.com Sat Sep 25 17:12:28 2004 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:12:28 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml Message-ID: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS. Please try out the following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the browsers. Apparently the tables in comment.thtml were causing some problems with recent versions of IE. The version below works with firefox and IE 6.0, I'd like others to test it with other browsers. Thanks, Vinny
{title}
{lang_authoredby} {start_author_anchortag}{author}{end_author_anchortag} {lang_on} {date}
{comments}
[ {lang_replytothis} {parent_link} {delete_option}]
From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Sep 25 17:35:00 2004 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:35:00 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml In-Reply-To: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> References: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20040925223500.11395@smtp.haun-online.de> >Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS. Please try out the >following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the >browsers. No apparent problems or oddities in Mozilla 1.7.3 (Mac), Safari 1.2.3, Opera 7.5.4 (Mac), OmniWeb 4.5, iCab 2.9.8, IE 5.2.3 (Mac). Didn't try Netscape 4.5, though ;-) bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From tomw at pigstye.net Sat Sep 25 17:51:40 2004 From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:40 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml In-Reply-To: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> References: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20040925214825.M60176@pigstye.net> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:12:28 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote > Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS. Please try out the > following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the > browsers. Apparently the tables in comment.thtml were causing some > problems with recent versions of IE. The version below works with > firefox and IE 6.0, I'd like others to test it with other browsers. > > Thanks, > Vinny > Installed it on GPlugs and using IE 6.0 on Win98. The first two comments I looked at were fine but the third story I looked at had width problems. Try it looking at the story: Site Index Change for 1.3.9 and see what it does from your place. The width issue may be the long line in the first comment. >
>
{title}
>
{lang_authoredby} > {start_author_anchortag}{author}{end_author_anchortag} {lang_on} > {date}
>
{comments}
> >
> _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel -- Tom Willett tomw at pigstye.net From geeklog at langfamily.ca Sat Sep 25 21:03:07 2004 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:03:07 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] A lesson to learn from Mambo? References: <20040918202801.18866@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <001001c4a364$95c96f40$650a10ac@XPBL2> I agree Dirk, this is something we need to keep in mind. I've done quite a few for-fee projects and everytime I bring up the question of adding this similar feature back into Geeklog core, the clients are 100% onside. They recognize immediately the benefit of having the modification supported and remove the issue with upgrades. I don't think we can ever be too cautious and getting agreement and understanding up front or soon as it appears to be a solution with wider appeal is key. When doing contract work (developement for hire), I believe the client owns the right to the work product unless contracts say otherwise. Blaine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dirk Haun" To: Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 3:28 PM Subject: [geeklog-devel] A lesson to learn from Mambo? There's an interesting article on Slashdot about a dispute over a piece of code in the Mambo CMS: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/18/1348255 Apparently, one of the Mambo developers made a modification for a customer (and was paid for it). Since he liked that feature, he re- implemented (and extended) it and added it to the Mambo distribution. Now the customer is p*ssed and threatens all the Mambo users(!) with lawsuits and whatnot. Even though the customer is obviously overreacting (and, it seems, wrong), this is something those of us who are doing custom work on Geeklog should be careful about. Please, everbody, check with your customers before you add any custom code to the Geeklog core. bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel From vfuria at gmail.com Sat Sep 25 22:24:53 2004 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:24:53 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml In-Reply-To: <20040925214825.M60176@pigstye.net> References: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> <20040925214825.M60176@pigstye.net> Message-ID: <8319e2d604092519243fc1a70e@mail.gmail.com> Hey Tom, Could you get a screen shot. I tried to reproduce with IE 6.0 under windows 2000 and didn't see it. Thanks, Vinny On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:40 +0000, Tom Willett wrote: > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:12:28 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote > > Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS. Please try out the > > following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the > > browsers. Apparently the tables in comment.thtml were causing some > > problems with recent versions of IE. The version below works with > > firefox and IE 6.0, I'd like others to test it with other browsers. > > > > Thanks, > > Vinny > > > > Installed it on GPlugs and using IE 6.0 on Win98. The first two comments I > looked at were fine but the third story I looked at had width problems. Try > it looking at the story: Site Index Change for 1.3.9 and see what it does > from your place. The width issue may be the long line in the first comment. > > >
> >
{title}
> >
{lang_authoredby} > > {start_author_anchortag}{author}{end_author_anchortag} {lang_on} > > {date}
> >
{comments}
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -- > Tom Willett > tomw at pigstye.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From tomw at pigstye.net Sat Sep 25 22:41:54 2004 From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:41:54 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml In-Reply-To: <8319e2d604092519243fc1a70e@mail.gmail.com> References: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> <20040925214825.M60176@pigstye.net> <8319e2d604092519243fc1a70e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20040926023654.M72799@pigstye.net> What screen size do you have, mines only 800x600, it would probably ok at 1024x768. The comment line is the full width of the following line: $display .= ''; oops it even wrapped in my mailer, but it doesn't on screen. I am not trying to get out of a screen shot, but it may not mean much. Reduce your screen size so the first comment of the third story needs to wrap the line above and it won't. On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:24:53 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote > Hey Tom, > > Could you get a screen shot. I tried to reproduce with IE 6.0 under > windows 2000 and didn't see it. > > Thanks, > Vinny > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:40 +0000, Tom Willett wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:12:28 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote > > > Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS. Please try out the > > > following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the > > > browsers. Apparently the tables in comment.thtml were causing some > > > problems with recent versions of IE. The version below works with > > > firefox and IE 6.0, I'd like others to test it with other browsers. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vinny > > > > > > > Installed it on GPlugs and using IE 6.0 on Win98. The first two comments I > > looked at were fine but the third story I looked at had width problems. Try > > it looking at the story: Site Index Change for 1.3.9 and see what it does > > from your place. The width issue may be the long line in the first comment. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > > -- > > Tom Willett > > tomw at pigstye.net > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel -- Tom Willett tomw at pigstye.net From vfuria at gmail.com Sat Sep 25 22:44:07 2004 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:44:07 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml In-Reply-To: <20040926023654.M72799@pigstye.net> References: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> <20040925214825.M60176@pigstye.net> <8319e2d604092519243fc1a70e@mail.gmail.com> <20040926023654.M72799@pigstye.net> Message-ID: <8319e2d604092519441ef247cf@mail.gmail.com> OK, I see it now Tom. It looks like it isn't wrapping because it has
 tags around the line.  I'd be surprised if it wrapped with
the old comment.thtml.  Is there a way to override 
 tags to force
wrapping?

-Vinny


On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:41:54 +0000, Tom Willett  wrote:
> What screen size do you have, mines only 800x600, it would probably ok at
> 1024x768.  The comment line is the full width of the following line:
> 
> $display .= '';
> 
> oops it even wrapped in my mailer, but it doesn't on screen.
> 
> I am not trying to get out of a screen shot, but it may not mean much.
> Reduce your screen size so the first comment of the third story needs to wrap
> the line above and it won't.
> 
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:24:53 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote
> 
> 
> > Hey Tom,
> >
> > Could you get a screen shot. I tried to reproduce with IE 6.0 under
> > windows 2000 and didn't see it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vinny
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:40 +0000, Tom Willett  wrote:
> > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:12:28 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote
> > > > Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS.  Please try out the
> > > > following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the
> > > > browsers.  Apparently the tables in comment.thtml were causing some
> > > > problems with recent versions of IE.  The version below works with
> > > > firefox and IE  6.0, I'd like others to test it with other browsers.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Vinny
> > > >
> > >
> > > Installed it on GPlugs and using IE 6.0 on Win98.  The first two comments
> I
> > > looked at were fine but the third story I looked at had width problems.
> Try
> > > it looking at the story:  Site Index Change for 1.3.9 and see what it does
> > > from your place.  The width issue may be the long line in the first
> comment.
> > >
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom Willett
> > > tomw at pigstye.net
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> --
> Tom Willett
> tomw at pigstye.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>


From tomw at pigstye.net  Sat Sep 25 23:42:56 2004
From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:42:56 +0000
Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml
In-Reply-To: <8319e2d604092519441ef247cf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8319e2d604092514126eaebe7b@mail.gmail.com> <20040925214825.M60176@pigstye.net> <8319e2d604092519243fc1a70e@mail.gmail.com> <20040926023654.M72799@pigstye.net> <8319e2d604092519441ef247cf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040926034039.M97875@pigstye.net>

I'm wrong -- I restored the original comment.thtml and it looks the same.  I 
never noticed it because I always looked at it at work on my big monitors.

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:44:07 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote
> OK, I see it now Tom.  It looks like it isn't wrapping because it has
> 
 tags around the line.  I'd be surprised if it wrapped 
> with the old comment.thtml.  Is there a way to override 
 tags 
> to force wrapping?
> 
> -Vinny
> 
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:41:54 +0000, Tom Willett  wrote:
> > What screen size do you have, mines only 800x600, it would probably ok at
> > 1024x768.  The comment line is the full width of the following line:
> > 
> > $display .= '';
> > 
> > oops it even wrapped in my mailer, but it doesn't on screen.
> > 
> > I am not trying to get out of a screen shot, but it may not mean much.
> > Reduce your screen size so the first comment of the third story needs to 
wrap
> > the line above and it won't.
> > 
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:24:53 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote
> > 
> > 
> > > Hey Tom,
> > >
> > > Could you get a screen shot. I tried to reproduce with IE 6.0 under
> > > windows 2000 and didn't see it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vinny
> > >
> > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:40 +0000, Tom Willett  
wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:12:28 -0400, Vincent Furia wrote
> > > > > Anyone currently using 1.3.9 or current CVS.  Please try out the
> > > > > following comment.thtml and make sure it works well with all the
> > > > > browsers.  Apparently the tables in comment.thtml were causing some
> > > > > problems with recent versions of IE.  The version below works with
> > > > > firefox and IE  6.0, I'd like others to test it with other browsers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Vinny
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Installed it on GPlugs and using IE 6.0 on Win98.  The first two 
comments
> > I
> > > > looked at were fine but the third story I looked at had width 
problems.
> > Try
> > > > it looking at the story:  Site Index Change for 1.3.9 and see what it 
does
> > > > from your place.  The width issue may be the long line in the first
> > comment.
> > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > > > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > > > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tom Willett
> > > > tomw at pigstye.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > 
> > > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> > 
> > --
> > Tom Willett
> > tomw at pigstye.net
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel


--
Tom Willett
tomw at pigstye.net



From dirk at haun-online.de  Sun Sep 26 03:51:35 2004
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:51:35 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] comment.thtml
In-Reply-To: <8319e2d604092519441ef247cf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8319e2d604092519441ef247cf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040926085135.25443@smtp.haun-online.de>

Vinny,

>Is there a way to override 
 tags to force wrapping?

According to the W3C, user agents "May disable automatic word wrap" for
the 
 element (which, it seems, most of them do).


The CSS2 'max-width' property is meant to let your override this:


However, IIRC, IE6 doesn't support max-width ...

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.haun-online.de/
http://www.macosx-faq.de/



From dirk at haun-online.de  Sun Sep 26 06:11:27 2004
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:11:27 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] New default theme
Message-ID: <20040926111127.32120@smtp.haun-online.de>

The Professional theme is now in CVS and has been set as the new default
theme in config.php. Thanks again to Victor B. Gonzalez for providing it!

I'm still waiting for a new logo (Simon?). Until then, the one I made has
to do ...

Please report any problems you may find with the theme. It should be
fully HTML 4.01 and CSS compliant, but that also depends on your site's
content. HTML errors in the content of articles or comments or in HTML
provided by plugins are, of course, not the theme's fault ...

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.haun-online.de/
http://www.tinyweb.de/



From mathfox at xs4all.nl  Sun Sep 26 09:37:55 2004
From: mathfox at xs4all.nl (Peter Roozemaal)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:37:55 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] A lesson to learn from Mambo?
In-Reply-To: <001001c4a364$95c96f40$650a10ac@XPBL2>
References: <20040918202801.18866@smtp.haun-online.de> <001001c4a364$95c96f40$650a10ac@XPBL2>
Message-ID: <4156C633.20300@xs4all.nl>

Blaine Lang wrote:

> I don't think we can ever be too cautious and getting agreement and 
> understanding up front or soon as it appears to be a solution with wider 
> appeal is key. When doing contract work (developement for hire), I believe 
> the client owns the right to the work product unless contracts say 
> otherwise.

The rules on "work for hire" differ between countries. Some countries
assume copyright transfers automaticly to the employer and others assume
that copyrights remain with the author/contractor. It is best to make
clear in the contract who will get the copyright on the modifications
made for hire. (If the employer ensist on getting the copyrights on his
modification, make sure that it is limited to "the work done under this
contract" and doesn't extend to previous and/or later work.)
Another piece of advice: Make clear in the contract that the work you do
"is based on code distributed under the GPL" and that the resulting work
is subject to the GPL.

Pamela says I should put down the disclaimer that "I am not a Lawyer" here;
	Greetings,

	Peter.

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dirk Haun" 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 3:28 PM
> Subject: [geeklog-devel] A lesson to learn from Mambo?
> 
> There's an interesting article on Slashdot about a dispute over a piece
> of code in the Mambo CMS:
> 
>     http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/18/1348255
> 
> Apparently, one of the Mambo developers made a modification for a
> customer (and was paid for it). Since he liked that feature, he re-
> implemented (and extended) it and added it to the Mambo distribution. Now
> the customer is p*ssed and threatens all the Mambo users(!) with lawsuits
> and whatnot.



From tony at tonybibbs.com  Mon Sep 27 17:14:24 2004
From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:14:24 -0500
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Another anti-spam feature for comments
Message-ID: <415882B0.5050706@tonybibbs.com>

See http://blog.bitflux.ch/archive/fighting-comment-spam.html

The jist of the post is:

"One of the most effective anti-spam measurement is simply not to allow 
comments for posts of a certain age (or only moderated comments)."

This would probably only be a couple of lines of code and an additional 
configuration variable.

--Tony


From vfuria at gmail.com  Tue Sep 28 13:42:37 2004
From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:42:37 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Updated 1.3.10 to-do list
In-Reply-To: <20040816141611.18371@smtp.haun-online.de>
References: <20040816141611.18371@smtp.haun-online.de>
Message-ID: <8319e2d60409281042471fb650@mail.gmail.com>

How close are we to releasing 1.3.10-rc1?  Is there anything I can do to help?

-Vinny

BTW:  The two comment tasks I had are now finished.  Sorry about the
delay, moving was a bigger job than I anticipated.

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:16:11 +0200, Dirk Haun  wrote:
> Okay, looks like we're down to these tasks:
> 
> Tony:
> - fix pdf generator
> - integrate SpamX plugin
> 
> Blaine:
> - fix archive option (delete images when article is deleted)
> 
> Vinny:
> - add link back to the story for comments in 'view' mode
> - fix display of Admin options (delete, IP address lookup) in 'view' mode
> 
> Dirk:
> - update documentation
> - update language files
> - add Professional theme to CVS
> 
> Simon:
> - new logo
> 
> Anything else? Can we get this done until, say, next weekend?
> 
> Btw, I'll be pretty much offline Tuesday - Thursday, but will catch up
> with you on Friday.
> 
> bye, Dirk
> 
> --
> http://www.geeklog.net/
> http://geeklog.info/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>


From geeklog at langfamily.ca  Tue Sep 28 14:04:43 2004
From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:04:43 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Updated 1.3.10 to-do list
References: <20040816141611.18371@smtp.haun-online.de> <8319e2d60409281042471fb650@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <008a01c4a585$a18cd010$650a10ac@XPBL2>

Other items on my list:
1:Working with Tom Willet on some changes to the SPAMX plugin and new API.
2: Add autotag support to new "add" comment code

Code to delete images if story has expired is in CVS - index.php
    } else if ($statuscode == STORY_DELETE_ON_EXPIRE) {
        COM_errorLOG("Delete Story and comments: $sid, Topic:$expiretopic, 
Title: $title. Expired :$expire");
        STORY_deleteImages ($sid);
        DB_query("DELETE FROM {$_TABLES['comments']} WHERE sid='{$sid}'");
        DB_query("DELETE FROM {$_TABLES['stories']} WHERE sid='{$sid}'");
    }

Blaine
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vincent Furia" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Updated 1.3.10 to-do list


How close are we to releasing 1.3.10-rc1?  Is there anything I can do to 
help?

-Vinny

BTW:  The two comment tasks I had are now finished.  Sorry about the
delay, moving was a bigger job than I anticipated.

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:16:11 +0200, Dirk Haun  wrote:
> Okay, looks like we're down to these tasks:
>
> Tony:
> - fix pdf generator
> - integrate SpamX plugin
>
> Blaine:
> - fix archive option (delete images when article is deleted)
>
> Vinny:
> - add link back to the story for comments in 'view' mode
> - fix display of Admin options (delete, IP address lookup) in 'view' mode
>
> Dirk:
> - update documentation
> - update language files
> - add Professional theme to CVS
>
> Simon:
> - new logo
>
> Anything else? Can we get this done until, say, next weekend?
>
> Btw, I'll be pretty much offline Tuesday - Thursday, but will catch up
> with you on Friday.
>
> bye, Dirk
>
> --
> http://www.geeklog.net/
> http://geeklog.info/
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel 



From dirk at haun-online.de  Tue Sep 28 14:03:17 2004
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:03:17 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Updated 1.3.10 to-do list
In-Reply-To: <8319e2d60409281042471fb650@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8319e2d60409281042471fb650@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20040928190317.28228@smtp.haun-online.de>

Vinny,

>How close are we to releasing 1.3.10-rc1?

Pretty close I would say.


>Is there anything I can do to help?

The to-do list is surprisingly short at this point:

- Blaine and Tom are working on a more generic SpamX API
- Someone should fix the PDF generator (either Tony or yourself)
- I've promised Turias some plugin API functions for the phpBBBridge
- I also have to update the language files (I have a script for that :-)

There are 2 bugs that I'd like to be fixed as well:

#174 "Quotes in titles are turned into double htmlentitles"
#243 "adding users by Admin corrupts the database"

The wording on #243 is a bit strong, but it can happen that when 2 Admins
create new users at the same time, they both get the same uid for their user.

These are both unclaimed at the moment ...


>BTW:  The two comment tasks I had are now finished.  Sorry about the
>delay, moving was a bigger job than I anticipated.

No problem, it all took longer than expected.

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.haun-online.de/
http://www.handful-of-sparks.de/



From tomw at pigstye.net  Thu Sep 30 09:57:58 2004
From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:57:58 +0000
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Image resizing with gdlib
Message-ID: <20040930134510.M38119@pigstye.net>

I was playing with the automatic image resizing using gdlib this morning and 
noticed something wrong.

The image resize works correctly but the link in the article is wrong.  The 
image is converted to png but the article points to the picture as a gif.  
The image is correctly converted to png and resized and resides in the image 
directory, the link is simply wrong.  Here is the debug information:

Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: File size for 2milmap.gif is 14617 
bytes 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: File, 2milmap.gif is of mime type 
image/gif and IS an image file. 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: in _getImageDimensions I got a 
width of 790, and a height of 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Max allowed width = 300, Image 
width = 790 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Max allowed height = 300, Image 
height = 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: File, 2milmap.gif has a width of 
790 and a height of 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: File, 2milmap.gif is of mime type 
image/gif and IS an image file. 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: in _getImageDimensions I got a 
width of 790, and a height of 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Max allowed width = 300, Image 
width = 790 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Max allowed height = 300, Image 
height = 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: File, 2milmap.gif has a width of 
790 and a height of 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: in _getImageDimensions I got a 
width of 790, and a height of 423 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Going to resize image to 300x160 
using gdlib 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: converting GIF to PNG 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Deleting 
GIF: /var/www/html/images/articles/20040930083457840_1.gif 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Resizing image, 
factor=0.37974683544304 
Thu 30 Sep 2004 08:35:17 AM EST - Debug: Image, 2milmap.gif was resized from 
790x423 to 300x160 

Am I missing a setting somewhere?

I set config.php to:

$_CONF['image_lib'] = 'gdlib';

and left the rest default.

Running on Fedora Core 2

PHP 4.3.8
Apache 2.0.51 
GD 2.0.23 with gif, jpg, and png support


--
Tom Willett
tomw at pigstye.net