[geeklog-devel] Feature Request: ADMIN_list (2 requests)

Oliver Spiesshofer oliver at spiesshofer.com
Tue Aug 21 23:03:32 EDT 2007

Ok, I get what you mean now.

However, if you have two different functions since you have two 
different lists, the fact that the form fields are called the same 
should not be an issue no? I am not sure how the "Check all" behaves 
Finally the url of each form can be different, and include get-variables 
to differentiate two forms pointing to the same target file (such as 

The additional fields on the bottom can be done with an additional code 
in the array similar as you indicated. I do not think that would be too 


Joe Mucchiello wrote:
> No, I just want to be able to NAME the checkboxes. Currently they are 
> delitem and I need to put two admin lists on the same page and based 
> on the setup, it isn't easy to generate unique form urls for the two 
> lists. Multiple checkboxes would be a bit insane. (Although being able 
> to specify where the check boxes appear would be nice too. :-) )
> Adding things through templates only works if I can pass in the name 
> of the template to admin_list(). I don't want ALL admin lists to have 
> extra buttons.
> The extra buttons would go on the same line as the trash can.
> All the code changes are basically in my email. You just need to 
> search for the lines to make the modifications. If you like, I'll send 
> you a full function with my changes and you can compare it that way. 
> (I'll have to go look at CVS's lib-admin to make sure I'm not losing 
> any important fixes though.)
> Basically it would be nice to have something like:
> [] data data data
> [] data data data
> [drop list [v] [GO]
> So you could perform actions on several items besides deleting them. 
> For example,
> [] data data data
> [] data data data
> Move to folder [drop list of folders [v] [GO]
> As much as you don't want to overcomplicate that beast of a function, 
> I don't want to clone it and maintain a fork. :-)
>   Joe
> At 09:21 PM 8/21/2007, Oliver Spiesshofer wrote:
>> And I thought the whole Adminlist was complicated enough already :-)
>> Can you tell me what you want to do? I do not want to blow this up 
>> into a monster where no one can handle the code afterwards anymore.
>> I would prefer to allow the codewriter to add things through 
>> templates or so instead of making the main function even more complex.
>> You want to have several checkboxes and then also for the next row 
>> another button on the end of the row?
>> Oliver
> ----
> Joe Mucchiello
> Throwing Dice Games
> http://www.throwingdice.com
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

More information about the geeklog-devel mailing list