[geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 3, Issue 7

[Michael Brusletten]

I know Windows does not care about the case sensitivity issue.  So in the up to date look and feel.  Go for it!  Geeklog in its
spelling is fine instead of GeekLog from the 90s look.

Michael

----- Original Message ----- > Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:18:58 +0800
> From: Oliver Spiesshofer <oliver at spiesshofer.com>
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] GeekLog vs. Geeklog
> To: Geeklog Development <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
> Message-ID: <466A8CA2.1080409 at spiesshofer.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I agree. And whatever I learned in marketing studies does also.
>
> Oliver
>
> Dirk Haun wrote:
> > Here's a topic for a highly controversial and emotional debate ... Or
> > maybe not:
> >
> > Would anybody be offended or otherwise emotionally scarred if I changed
> > every occurence of the spelling "GeekLog" (with an uppercase 'L') to
> > "Geeklog" (with a lowercase 'l') in CVS?
> >
> > Effectively, this has been the "correct" spelling for a while now. Our
> > logo spells it like that, as does everyone I know.
> >
> > >From a branding point of view: Consistency is good. And while the name
> > has too many vocals to swim with the Web 2.0 crowd, this would at least
> > remove the 90's smell that I somehow associate with that spelling ...
> >
> > bye, Dirk
> >