[geeklog-devel] Plugin help --- Package Extractor

[Blaine Lang]

/me set reminder to really really look at this!
pear install forum -- certainly sounds easy :)

Tony Bibbs wrote:
> That's my point, they don't have to setup a PEAR repository, an *embedded* PEAR repository would come with a core Geeklog setup.  Frankly until somebody other than me is willing to lift the hood at how you might use PEAR for this instead of writing it off because they *think* they know how it all works, it's probably not worth discussing much further.  I'm the first to admit that embedding PEAR is not typical use, that PEAR because of it's feature set it can be complex and requires a bit of ramp to understand but there are a lot of smart people on this list who no doubt could figure this out with a little time.  If we collectively choose to ignore the possibility of using PEAR (which is likely based on overwhelming silence from some of the more noteable 1.x developers) , that's fine but I just want to be on record for saying as clearly as possible that PEAR
> was built to do *exactly* what is trying to be accomplished here.
>
> --Tony
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Mucchiello <joe at ThrowingDice.com>
> To: Geeklog Development <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:57:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Plugin help --- Package Extractor
>
> At 10:06 AM 6/14/2007, you wrote:
>   
>> Joe, while all this sounds good, it duplicates everything PEAR 
>> does.  Just a note you can do all this stuff with an embedded PEAR 
>> installation (read: no dependency on a system-level PEAR 
>> installation).  While people are trying out Joe's code (which is 
>> good) I'd wish people would do more than just stare blindly at the 
>> PEAR stuff committed months ago.  A little TLC and it will do 
>> everything Joe's trying to do minus having to manage the core code 
>> that manages packages, etc.
>>
>> Feel free to drop this note in the Trash folder, but figured i'd 
>> remind everybody this sort of stuff is there in a way that is a lot 
>> less work us.  Not that I'm bitter ;-)
>>     
>
> I think explaining to folks how to setup a PEAR repository is a lot 
> harder than how to setup geeklog. And people get geeklog screwed up 
> all the time. I doubt you read the installation help forums at 
> geeklog.net but everyday someone else needs help. Dirk directs them 
> to a couple FAQs and then the next day they're posting the path/url 
> section of their config.php so we can understand just what they've 
> screwed up because even with a bunch very straightforward directions 
> and faqs, people don't get it right. Once my plugin is working well, 
> I would hope it would get into the core because installing plugins is 
> the next big headache.
>
> The core problem is people who do not understand the difference among 
> files, directory paths and urls are the target audience for CMS 
> software. Anything we can do to make that easier for the devs to 
> support helps. Also, remember, there is no reason why there can't be 
> both my plugin and the PEAR channels. If the PEAR channel were 
> completed, my plugin could hook into it too. Remember I'm writing 
> this as a device to reduce the amount of support requests on the 
> website. I don't know if I'll succeed, but I think a targeted 
> solution will work better than just throwing PEAR at the problem.
>
> ----
> Joe Mucchiello
> Throwing Dice Games
> http://www.throwingdice.com 
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
>