[geeklog-devel] Geeklog Project Names (was Perception is Everything)
Michael Jervis
mjervis at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 04:57:20 EDT 2008
So, IMHO, this clearly needs splitting off.
Some proposals for votes, I guess?
Geeklog 1.x
------------------
1) The application can not be split into a framework and release
+1 from me
2) The application should be renamed to make it more marketable
-1 from me
I beleive it's too "late" to do that, and we're not at an appropriate
break point for this. We have to "live" with Geeklog 1.x, which I
don't find to be a problem, it's just at the "enterprise" end.
Geeklog 2.x
------------------
1) The project should be clearly delineated from distributions of applications
+1 from me
I beleive we should have a framework separate to lots of "core team" plugins.
1a) There should be a core framework
+1
1b) There should be a set of "core" plugins
+1
1c) There should be a community distribution called Geeklog 2.x that
is an upgrade path from Geeklog 1.x
+1
2) The project should be renamed to make it more marketable.
-1 from me.
With a split into framework, plugins and distributions, I don't think
this is necessary, but I guess you could call it G2F (Geeklog 2
Framework) to say that a distro is powered by it without saying
Geeklog.
2a) There should be a core "commercial" distro with an appropriate
name maintained also by core team
+1
And of course, Blaine, Trinity etc could maintain their own premium
distro's based on the framework.
--
Michael Jervis
mjervis at gmail.com
504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765
62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82
0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64
504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000
More information about the geeklog-devel
mailing list