[geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch forenterprise users

Michael Jervis mjervis at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 12:04:22 EST 2008


We got the patch. I don't think anyone has yet looked at it.

Cheers,

Mike

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Blank, Jessica
<Jessica.Blank at mtvnmix.com> wrote:
> Hello all:
>
>  I can't see any responses that were sent to me regarding this patch; my
>  mailbox was over quota for the past couple of days. Was my patch
>  received, and is it satisfactory?
>
>  Sorry for any confusion,
>
>  Jessica
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Blank, Jessica
>  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:53 PM
>  To: Geeklog Development
>
>
> Subject: RE: [geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch
>  forenterprise users
>
>  Absolutely! See attached. If you have any problem integrating it into
>  the current tree, please let me know and I will gladly do a CVS checkout
>  and prepare a new patch. This patch is taken against stock 1.4.1 (I
>  generally stay away from non-stable CVS builds of things when working on
>  code for production use ;) )
>
>  --Jessica
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net on behalf of Dirk Haun
>  Sent: Wed 2/20/2008 2:49 PM
>  To: geeklog-devel
>  Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch
>  forenterprise users
>
>  Blank, Jessica wrote:
>
>  >Wonderful. This is a relatively small patch and shouldn't present a
>  >problem. :) I will post again regarding this patch after the 1.5
>  >release
>
>  Actually, I was about to suggest that this patch might fit right in
>  (assuming it does what I think it does).
>
>  In 1.5, we now have OpenID support. And we do have an option to disable
>  normal logins - but that option doesn't do anything yet.
>
>  So assuming this really is a small patch, I'd be willing to bend the
>  rules a bit. It would probably also save us a bunch of support requests
>  ("This option doesn't work!" ;-)
>
>  Jessica, let's see that patch, please. Since, embarrassingly, our
>  project site still isn't in working order, simply zip it up and post it
>  here.
>
>  Thanks!
>
>  bye, Dirk
>
>
>  --
>  http://www.geeklog.net/
>  http://geeklog.info/
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  geeklog-devel mailing list
>  geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>  http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  geeklog-devel mailing list
>  geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>  http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>



-- 
Michael Jervis
mjervis at gmail.com
504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765
62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82
0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64
504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000



More information about the geeklog-devel mailing list