[geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch forenterprise users

[Michael Jervis]

We got the patch. I don't think anyone has yet looked at it.

Cheers,

Mike

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Blank, Jessica
<Jessica.Blank at mtvnmix.com> wrote:

> Hello all:

>

>  I can't see any responses that were sent to me regarding this patch; my

>  mailbox was over quota for the past couple of days. Was my patch

>  received, and is it satisfactory?

>

>  Sorry for any confusion,

>

>  Jessica

>

>

>  -----Original Message-----

>  From: Blank, Jessica

>  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:53 PM

>  To: Geeklog Development

>

>

> Subject: RE: [geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch

>  forenterprise users

>

>  Absolutely! See attached. If you have any problem integrating it into

>  the current tree, please let me know and I will gladly do a CVS checkout

>  and prepare a new patch. This patch is taken against stock 1.4.1 (I

>  generally stay away from non-stable CVS builds of things when working on

>  code for production use ;) )

>

>  --Jessica

>

>  -----Original Message-----

>  From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net on behalf of Dirk Haun

>  Sent: Wed 2/20/2008 2:49 PM

>  To: geeklog-devel

>  Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch

>  forenterprise users

>

>  Blank, Jessica wrote:

>

>  >Wonderful. This is a relatively small patch and shouldn't present a

>  >problem. :) I will post again regarding this patch after the 1.5

>  >release

>

>  Actually, I was about to suggest that this patch might fit right in

>  (assuming it does what I think it does).

>

>  In 1.5, we now have OpenID support. And we do have an option to disable

>  normal logins - but that option doesn't do anything yet.

>

>  So assuming this really is a small patch, I'd be willing to bend the

>  rules a bit. It would probably also save us a bunch of support requests

>  ("This option doesn't work!" ;-)

>

>  Jessica, let's see that patch, please. Since, embarrassingly, our

>  project site still isn't in working order, simply zip it up and post it

>  here.

>

>  Thanks!

>

>  bye, Dirk

>

>

>  --

>  http://www.geeklog.net/

>  http://geeklog.info/

>

>  _______________________________________________

>  geeklog-devel mailing list

>  geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

>  http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

>

>

>  _______________________________________________

>  geeklog-devel mailing list

>  geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

>  http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

>




-- 
Michael Jervis
mjervis at gmail.com
504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765
62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82
0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64
504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000