[geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch forenterprise users

Blank, Jessica Jessica.Blank at mtvnmix.com
Mon Feb 25 15:38:34 EST 2008

This is true. I'd argue that it should be the other way around though;
have the information there, but IN A COMMENT... So if the admin wants
the page to be verbose and specify the login method on the page, they
simply remove the comment tags ("<!--" and "-->") :)

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:37 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] 'force_remoteauthentication' patch
forenterprise users

At 03:27 PM 2/25/2008, Blank, Jessica wrote:
>In our experience, users get confused when they are provided with
>extraneous information.              <snip>

>What do you think?

It's easier to have information there that the ADMIN can remove from the
template (or language files) than to want information that Geeklog does
not provide. So if when you upgrade decide the "login via LDAP" text is
confusing, you could remove it. Others may decide to leave it there.

Joe Mucchiello
Throwing Dice Games

geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

More information about the geeklog-devel mailing list