[geeklog-devel] OpenID & OAuth Support

[Rouslan Placella]

As I was interested in OpenId, I remember asking Dirk about this. He  
said that it's done and just missing Geeklog integration. The student  
that was working on this project disappeared.

Rouslan

Quoting Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:

> I have been setting up resynching for OAuth and wanted to look at the other
> remote login methods.
>
> I tried to get my Google OpenID account to log into Geeklog but I get a
> "Unable to find an OpenID server for the given identity URL." message. I
> haven't really looked into the OpenID side of things yet, does Google just
> support OpenID 2.0?
>
> Also what is the state of the GSOC 2009 OpenID 2 project?
>
> http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/SoC_full_openid_support
>
> If I have to rewrite some code here to get resynch to work, I might as well
> merge the OpenID 2.0 project if it is almost finished.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-25-10 8:50 AM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] OAuth Support - Passwords and Emails
>
> Thanks Dirk. Looking over the list I had thought about re-syncing the data
> before. Would it make sense then to add a check box (instead of the password
> fields) for remote accounts sync and then when the user hits save, and the
> checkbox is checked, then revaluate the login and update the information
> (along with remember me).
>
> Tom
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
> Sent: October-24-10 10:41 PM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] OAuth Support - Passwords and Emails
>
> Ah, sorry, it's actually on the wiki (but should really be a bug report):
>
> http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Future_Plans#Clean_up_Remote_Authenticatio
> n
>
> bye, Dirk
>
> --
> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>
> Am 24.10.2010 um 18:31 schrieb "Tom" <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>
>> I checked the bug tracker and didn't see anything mentioned.
>>
>> Anyways, for remote accounts then I will remove the 3 password fields from
>> My Account Username & password tab. I will add in a check that confirms
> the
>> remote login for remember me and the email.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
>> Sent: October-23-10 5:14 PM
>> To: Geeklog Development
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] OAuth Support - Passwords and Emails
>>
>> Yes, the My Account page really has some issues with remote accounts and I
>> think they're the same issues with all kinds of remote services. For
>> example, when it asks for your password to change a setting (like how long
>> to stay logged in) it's not checking the remote password but the -
>> non-existing - local one.
>>
>> In fact, I think there's already an issue about this on the bugtracker.
>>
>> Greetings from the GSoC mentor summit :)
>>
>> bye, Dirk
>>
>> --
>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>
>> Am 23.10.2010 um 11:55 schrieb "Tom" <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>>
>>> Okay the OAuth hack is pretty much in place.
>>>
>>> Two things
>>>
>>> 1. How do we want to handle accounts without passwords?
>>>
>>> I was thinking of removing the password fields (and check) on the form
> "My
>>> Account -> Username & Password" for any user that doesn't have a
>>> remoteservice of NULL and passwd of '' in the users table. Will this work
>>> for the other login methods like OpenID, 3rdParty (livejournal, LDAP)?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Some User login methods do not give us the users email address.
>>>
>>> I will add in a check on the profile page so other users cannot send them
>> an
>>> email. Anything else needed here?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature
>>> database 5558 (20101023) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
>> database 5558 (20101023) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
>> database 5558 (20101023) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
>> database 5560 (20101024) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
>> database 5560 (20101024) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5560 (20101024) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5560 (20101024) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5561 (20101025) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5561 (20101025) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5561 (20101025) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5561 (20101025) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5567 (20101027) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5567 (20101027) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>