[geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] geeklog: Added COM_NoScript and noscript.thtml to allow core and...

[Tom]

I hate to do this in the beta but I guess I should also change the name to
COM_getNoScript to make it more self-explanatory.  I will do the same with
COM_Tooltip (COM_getTooltip)

Or should I not worry about it?

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
Sent: April-12-11 3:04 AM
To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] geeklog: Added COM_NoScript and
noscript.thtml to allow core and...

> changeset 8223:efe112a34ef1
> url:
http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/rev/efe112a34ef1
> user: Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>
> date: Mon Apr 11 10:45:58 2011 -0400
> description:
> Added COM_NoScript and noscript.thtml to allow core and plugins to have a
common way to display JavaScript disabled warnings.

Minor nitpick, but so far the naming convention was that there was a
lowercase letter after the COM_. I think there were a few more like that
that have crept in recently.

bye, Dirk


_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel