[geeklog-devel] Geeklog Printable Pages and Google

[Tom]

>From a philosophical point of view: Shouldn't it tell us something that the
printable pages rank higher than their "full" counterpart?

In my case most times they don't but the odd one still does. Another reason
to add the meta tag is possible duplicate content issues.

>New year, old name? What happened to Tom? ;-)

It should be switched back now.  I got a new PC and I missed that at first
after installing Outlook.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
Sent: January-03-11 1:39 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Printable Pages and Google

Rouslan Placella wrote:

> I think that the NOFOLLOW option should go in the link that is 
> pointing to the printable page

You may want to check that link on existing Geeklog sites ;-)


> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 17:16 -0500, Website Master wrote:

New year, old name? What happened to Tom? ;-)


>> <META name="robots" content="NOINDEX" />

I think this should be enough. If a spider ends up on a printable page, we
want it to find it's way back to the proper pages (and rank those).

>From a philosophical point of view: Shouldn't it tell us something that the
printable pages rank higher than their "full" counterpart?

bye, Dirk


_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel