[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[Vincent Furia]

I'm on board for a 2.0.

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 18:18, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> So what is the verdict here?****
>
> ** **
>
> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since: ****
>
> ** **
>
> **-          **We do break compatibilities with some plugins****
>
> **-          **A new Theme is being included****
>
> **-          **Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Tom****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:
> geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] *On Behalf Of *Vincent Furia
> *Sent:* March-05-12 2:34 PM
> *To:* Geeklog Development
> *Subject:* Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update****
>
> ** **
>
> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2" and was
> surprised to see that both only had a few results that included AptitudeCMS
> stuff. None of the links were likely to be confusing. The first link for
> both searches were to the "Geeklog 2" topic on geeklog.net. If we rename
> that topic as we planned, I don't think the confusion would be that great.
> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic id.
>
> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to deal
> with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last active
> AptitudeCMS development...
>
> -Vinny****
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:****
>
> Trinity wrote:
>
> > What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since it
> breaks compatibility with old plugins****
>
> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up myself
> because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear that
> incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much confusion this
> would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans for the other Geeklog
> 2.0 which can still be found all over the place (even though they are
> several years old by now). And I guess calling it 3.0 would be a bit of a
> stretch ;-)****
>
>
> bye, Dirk
>
>
> --
> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120313/186f4266/attachment.html>