[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

cordiste cordiste at free.fr
Wed Mar 14 08:50:09 EDT 2012


Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?

If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?

Ben

2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
>
> - Dan Stoner
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>> So what is the verdict here?
>>
>>
>>
>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
>>
>>
>>
>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
>>
>> -          A new Theme is being included
>>
>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent Furia
>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
>> To: Geeklog Development
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
>>
>>
>>
>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2" and was
>> surprised to see that both only had a few results that included AptitudeCMS
>> stuff. None of the links were likely to be confusing. The first link for
>> both searches were to the "Geeklog 2" topic on geeklog.net. If we rename
>> that topic as we planned, I don't think the confusion would be that great.
>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic id.
>>
>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to deal
>> with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last active
>> AptitudeCMS development...
>>
>> -Vinny
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>>
>> Trinity wrote:
>>
>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since it
>>> breaks compatibility with old plugins
>>
>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up myself
>> because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear that
>> incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much confusion this would
>> cause, though, with all the high-flying plans for the other Geeklog 2.0
>> which can still be found all over the place (even though they are several
>> years old by now). And I guess calling it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> bye, Dirk
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>



More information about the geeklog-devel mailing list