[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[Tom]

So I guess we still go Geeklog 2.0.0 then for this release? (for previous
stated reasons)

 

If the template stuff does happen the earliest it would get into Geeklog
would be late fall winter and if we had to we could go to version 3 for that
if it breaks a few things. 

 

Does that sound good Dirk?

 

Tom

 

 

From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent Furia
Sent: March-15-12 5:31 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

 

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 15:16, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

COM_siteHeader and COM_siteFooter really should be the last things called
before the webpage is displayed.


And to expand on that, there really should be a single "COM_displaySite"
function call. It would probably also make templating a lot easier. I'm
hoping we get into GSoC this year and get some good applications for the
template project.

-Vinny

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120315/4879d4c8/attachment.html>