[geeklog-devel] Geeklog CKEditor Integration

[Tom]

Surprising no replies yet on my post, I guess we should give them a bit
longer. The website says GPLv3 but the code says GPLv2+.  I would go with
the code version but it looks like they want to move to GPLv3 anyways (re
website says 3) which I guess if it doesn't give us problems now it may in
the future.

What are the next steps Dirk so we don't leave Dengen hanging.

 

Are you dead set changing the Geeklog license?

 

Tom

 

From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: July-31-13 5:34 PM
To: 'Geeklog Development'
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog CKEditor Integration

 

I have asked the question of which license the CKEditor uses and if we are
compatible on their forums.

 

http://ckeditor.com/forums/CKEditor/Licensing-Question-about-the-CKEditor-GP
Lv3-or-is-it-GPLv2-or-later

 

Hopefully we will get a positive reply.

 

Tom

 

From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori
Tahara
Sent: July-31-13 8:57 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog CKEditor Integration

 

Dirk wrote:
> And no worries, you're apparently not the only one who was confused by
this.
> I found a Drupal issue that also assumes CKEditor is GPLv3:
https://drupal.org/node/1996750

Thank you. It's very interesting information for me.
Well then, I wish to research about the CKEditor integration little more.


-- 
dengen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20130801/0e0cb336/attachment.html>