From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sat Mar  1 11:54:18 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 11:54:18 -0500
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
Message-ID: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>

Hi All,

For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade process in a
while. I am currently running the code live on one of my sites and it has
been working great.

My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new install
and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order? If I get
verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 tomorrow
(instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade Geeklog.net tomorrow)
so we can at least get a release out to the public for further testing. 

Thanks

Tom



From niemans at nlbox.com  Wed Mar  5 16:42:07 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 22:42:07 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <85CC4160-2FD9-4FB6-800F-BB378896B5E9@nlbox.com>

I?ve upgraded 2.0.0. and get the following:

Fatal error: Cannot redeclare LIB_Backupconfig() (previously declared in /is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/userbox/lib/lib_configuration.php:19) in/is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/databox/lib/lib_configuration.php on line 92

It looks like a plugin error, and I am not sure if the whole thing crashed or not.
How can I tell if the database is ok?

Wim

On 01 Mar 2014, at 17:54, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade process in a
> while. I am currently running the code live on one of my sites and it has
> been working great.
> 
> My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new install
> and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order? If I get
> verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 tomorrow
> (instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade Geeklog.net tomorrow)
> so we can at least get a release out to the public for further testing. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Wed Mar  5 18:57:30 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:57:30 -0500
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <85CC4160-2FD9-4FB6-800F-BB378896B5E9@nlbox.com>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
	<85CC4160-2FD9-4FB6-800F-BB378896B5E9@nlbox.com>
Message-ID: <000d01cf38ce$ab3eed00$01bcc700$@cogeco.net>

It is hard to say.

In the install there is the emergency rescue tool which you can use to
disable those 2 plugins. Once disabled you can see if Geeklog 2.0.0 upgraded
properly. 

Before installing Geeklog 2.0.0 you should of checked to see if all your
plugins are compatible (I am not sure about the userbox and databox
plugins). If not you will need to either upgrade them or disable them.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: March-05-14 4:42 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests

I've upgraded 2.0.0. and get the following:

Fatal error: Cannot redeclare LIB_Backupconfig() (previously declared in
/is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/userbox/lib/lib_configur
ation.php:19)
in/is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/databox/lib/lib_config
uration.php on line 92

It looks like a plugin error, and I am not sure if the whole thing crashed
or not.
How can I tell if the database is ok?

Wim

On 01 Mar 2014, at 17:54, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade 
> process in a while. I am currently running the code live on one of my 
> sites and it has been working great.
> 
> My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new 
> install and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order? 
> If I get verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 
> tomorrow (instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade 
> Geeklog.net tomorrow) so we can at least get a release out to the public
for further testing.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From niemans at nlbox.com  Wed Mar  5 21:08:22 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 03:08:22 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <000d01cf38ce$ab3eed00$01bcc700$@cogeco.net>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
	<85CC4160-2FD9-4FB6-800F-BB378896B5E9@nlbox.com>
	<000d01cf38ce$ab3eed00$01bcc700$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <0A441A47-FE23-4DB0-8D62-7EA100087965@nlbox.com>

It seems that my description was not clear.

As to your request I?ve executed a upgrade of a site running 2.0.0 to 2.1.0.
I don?t know is how I can determine if the plugins are ?compatible?; there is no information.
What I do know is that the bugger plugin runs in a early 2.1.0 version (nov 2013).
What is obvious to me is that my site is running now with the upgraded result.
What I don?t know is if the executed upgrade is complete as far as geeklog core is concerned.
And there must be a way to check the last action??

Wim

On 06 Mar 2014, at 00:57, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> It is hard to say.
> 
> In the install there is the emergency rescue tool which you can use to
> disable those 2 plugins. Once disabled you can see if Geeklog 2.0.0 upgraded
> properly. 
> 
> Before installing Geeklog 2.0.0 you should of checked to see if all your
> plugins are compatible (I am not sure about the userbox and databox
> plugins). If not you will need to either upgrade them or disable them.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
> Sent: March-05-14 4:42 PM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
> 
> I've upgraded 2.0.0. and get the following:
> 
> Fatal error: Cannot redeclare LIB_Backupconfig() (previously declared in
> /is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/userbox/lib/lib_configur
> ation.php:19)
> in/is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/databox/lib/lib_config
> uration.php on line 92
> 
> It looks like a plugin error, and I am not sure if the whole thing crashed
> or not.
> How can I tell if the database is ok?
> 
> Wim
> 
> On 01 Mar 2014, at 17:54, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade 
>> process in a while. I am currently running the code live on one of my 
>> sites and it has been working great.
>> 
>> My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new 
>> install and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order? 
>> If I get verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 
>> tomorrow (instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade 
>> Geeklog.net tomorrow) so we can at least get a release out to the public
> for further testing.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Thu Mar  6 06:51:01 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:51:01 -0500
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <0A441A47-FE23-4DB0-8D62-7EA100087965@nlbox.com>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
	<85CC4160-2FD9-4FB6-800F-BB378896B5E9@nlbox.com>
	<000d01cf38ce$ab3eed00$01bcc700$@cogeco.net>
	<0A441A47-FE23-4DB0-8D62-7EA100087965@nlbox.com>
Message-ID: <003601cf3932$586fe570$094fb050$@cogeco.net>

Ahh thanks for the clarification.

I am not sure why those 2 plugins are creating problems during the install
as there are not many changes that affect plugins between 2.0.0 and 2.1.0.
Any plugin that works on 2.0.0 should work on 2.1.0.

There is no quick way at the moment to determine if the upgrade was
completed 100% when the end result is an error page. In most cases I would
say No

You could check to see if the File Manager configuration was added (which is
found in the Geeklog Configuration (the last item under Miscellaneous). You
can also check to see if the Story ids and Topic Ids are varchar(128).

As far as the core plugins are concerned Spam-X plugin had a number of
updates including new configuration options and a new date field in the it's
database table. (I can't remember any other core plugins upgrades at the
moment).

Tom




-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: March-05-14 9:08 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests

It seems that my description was not clear.

As to your request I've executed a upgrade of a site running 2.0.0 to 2.1.0.
I don't know is how I can determine if the plugins are 'compatible'; there
is no information.
What I do know is that the bugger plugin runs in a early 2.1.0 version (nov
2013).
What is obvious to me is that my site is running now with the upgraded
result.
What I don't know is if the executed upgrade is complete as far as geeklog
core is concerned.
And there must be a way to check the last action..

Wim

On 06 Mar 2014, at 00:57, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> It is hard to say.
> 
> In the install there is the emergency rescue tool which you can use to 
> disable those 2 plugins. Once disabled you can see if Geeklog 2.0.0 
> upgraded properly.
> 
> Before installing Geeklog 2.0.0 you should of checked to see if all 
> your plugins are compatible (I am not sure about the userbox and 
> databox plugins). If not you will need to either upgrade them or disable
them.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim 
> Niemans
> Sent: March-05-14 4:42 PM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
> 
> I've upgraded 2.0.0. and get the following:
> 
> Fatal error: Cannot redeclare LIB_Backupconfig() (previously declared 
> in 
> /is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/userbox/lib/lib_co
> nfigur
> ation.php:19)
> in/is/htdocs/wp11145626_WT9JYK7WWY/www/_FyFy_/plugins/databox/lib/lib_
> config
> uration.php on line 92
> 
> It looks like a plugin error, and I am not sure if the whole thing 
> crashed or not.
> How can I tell if the database is ok?
> 
> Wim
> 
> On 01 Mar 2014, at 17:54, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade 
>> process in a while. I am currently running the code live on one of my 
>> sites and it has been working great.
>> 
>> My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new 
>> install and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order?
>> If I get verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 
>> tomorrow (instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade 
>> Geeklog.net tomorrow) so we can at least get a release out to the 
>> public
> for further testing.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From geeklog at mystral-kk.net  Fri Mar  7 16:46:18 2014
From: geeklog at mystral-kk.net (Kenji ITO)
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:46:18 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <43988.203.189.105.202.1394228778.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>

Tom wrote:

> For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade process in
> a
> while. I am currently running the code live on one of my sites and it has
> been working great.
>
> My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new install
> and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order? If I get
> verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 tomorrow
> (instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade Geeklog.net
> tomorrow)
> so we can at least get a release out to the public for further testing.

With the latest build, I tested a new install and an upgrade from GL-2.0.0
with success.  After synching the language files, it would be OK to do a
release candidate.
-- 
Kenji ITO
http://mystral-kk.net




From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Fri Mar  7 18:11:58 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:11:58 -0500
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <43988.203.189.105.202.1394228778.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
	<43988.203.189.105.202.1394228778.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
Message-ID: <013301cf3a5a$a3f05ce0$ebd116a0$@cogeco.net>

Thanks Kenji ITO.

I will double check the installs this weekend as well and package a release
along with an article on Geeklog.net.

Developers should check over the Geeklog history file and add anything they
think should be added.

Dirk if you have a second could you synch up the language files.

Thanks

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Kenji ITO
Sent: March-07-14 4:46 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests

Tom wrote:

> For Geeklog 2.1.0 I haven't tested a new install or the upgrade 
> process in a while. I am currently running the code live on one of my 
> sites and it has been working great.
>
> My time as of late has been pretty limited. Can someone test a new 
> install and upgrade for me to verify everything is in working order? 
> If I get verification I will do a release candidate for Geeklog 2.1.0 
> tomorrow (instead of a beta since I don't have time to upgrade 
> Geeklog.net
> tomorrow)
> so we can at least get a release out to the public for further testing.

With the latest build, I tested a new install and an upgrade from GL-2.0.0
with success.  After synching the language files, it would be OK to do a
release candidate.
--
Kenji ITO
http://mystral-kk.net


_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From dirk at haun-online.de  Sat Mar  8 10:39:26 2014
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 16:39:26 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <013301cf3a5a$a3f05ce0$ebd116a0$@cogeco.net>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
	<43988.203.189.105.202.1394228778.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
	<013301cf3a5a$a3f05ce0$ebd116a0$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <255848DE-C429-4207-922B-C51E484743C1@haun-online.de>

Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Dirk if you have a second could you synch up the language files.

Done.

Kenji, could you please double-check the Japanese language file for the Spam-X plugin? There were a lot of changes there, but I think they were only changes in whitespace and line endings. Thanks.

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sat Mar  8 15:55:18 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:55:18 -0500
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
In-Reply-To: <255848DE-C429-4207-922B-C51E484743C1@haun-online.de>
References: <02f701cf356e$e2e6b980$a8b42c80$@cogeco.net>
	<43988.203.189.105.202.1394228778.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
	<013301cf3a5a$a3f05ce0$ebd116a0$@cogeco.net>
	<255848DE-C429-4207-922B-C51E484743C1@haun-online.de>
Message-ID: <018201cf3b10$b6d372a0$247a57e0$@cogeco.net>

Thanks.

I think I might have some extra time tomorrow. If I do I will update
Geeklog.net with the latest version and release a beta instead of a release
candidate.

If I do update Geeklog.net I will be creating a new theme based on the
Modern Curve theme called Geeklog (for lack of a better name).  It will just
contain the changed theme files in the directory (with the few small changes
we make based on the
http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Geeklog_Release_Procedures). This will
make it easier for theme upgrades later on. 

Tom



-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
Sent: March-08-14 10:39 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests

Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Dirk if you have a second could you synch up the language files.

Done.

Kenji, could you please double-check the Japanese language file for the
Spam-X plugin? There were a lot of changes there, but I think they were only
changes in whitespace and line endings. Thanks.

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sun Mar  9 15:44:03 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 15:44:03 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
Message-ID: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>

Okay,

I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1. I
ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none of the Core
Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I had to go into
the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by clicking the update
icon. I checked the table structures and config values and they all seem to
be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices anything out of the ordinary
please let us know by posting to this mailing list (as I could have missed
something).

Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the
plugins upgrade as well?

If anyone else has time can they test the upgrade procedure please and
report back on success or failures!

In the next few days if no one has any problems I think I will post the
Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1 release... Unless people think I should do it now?

For Geeklog.net I have changed a few things in the configuration:

- The default postmode is now HTML for submissions
- The default editor is CKEditor
- Default Cache time for new articles and staticpages is 86400 seconds (1
day)
- New geeklognet_theme which is based on the Modern Curve theme. It just
contains the changed template files needed.

One bug that I notice in the error.log file  that will have to be looked
into regarding the XMLSitemap plugin is:

Sun Mar  9 14:00:04 2014 - 192.186.69.6 - SitemapXML::sendPing: HTTP error
code: 404

Thanks

Tom


-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: March-08-14 3:55 PM
To: 'Geeklog Development'
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests

Thanks.

I think I might have some extra time tomorrow. If I do I will update
Geeklog.net with the latest version and release a beta instead of a release
candidate.

If I do update Geeklog.net I will be creating a new theme based on the
Modern Curve theme called Geeklog (for lack of a better name).  It will just
contain the changed theme files in the directory (with the few small changes
we make based on the
http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Geeklog_Release_Procedures). This will
make it easier for theme upgrades later on. 

Tom



-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
Sent: March-08-14 10:39 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests

Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Dirk if you have a second could you synch up the language files.

Done.

Kenji, could you please double-check the Japanese language file for the
Spam-X plugin? There were a lot of changes there, but I think they were only
changes in whitespace and line endings. Thanks.

bye, Dirk


--
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From dirk at haun-online.de  Sun Mar  9 16:19:41 2014
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 21:19:41 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <D88DA320-40C6-4427-BDCB-3C323CE909B2@haun-online.de>

Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Geeklog upgraded fine but none of the Core
> Plugins did.

You say Core plugins, but I guess it really affects all plugins since they?re all treated equally. It?s just that the other plugins didn?t need an upgrade.


> In the next few days if no one has any problems I think I will post the
> Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1 release... Unless people think I should do it now?

I think this is a pretty significant bug which, when pointed out, will probably also keep people from even trying out that version and wait for a fix instead. So I?d suggest we fix the problem and go directly to a b2.

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/



From niemans at nlbox.com  Sun Mar  9 18:02:17 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:02:17 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <CCD6B7A0-0B0A-49FB-B29A-A52C759AB832@nlbox.com>


As stated earlier, my upgrade from 2.0 to 2.1 ran fine.
Plugins tried to upgrade and one failed.

Than to say that the calendar is disabled, but after upgrade it was installed.
There was a message though in the submission queue.

There was no log in the error.log of the upgrade process.

Wim



On 09 Mar 2014, at 20:44, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Okay,
> 
> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1. I
> ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none of the Core
> Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I had to go into
> the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by clicking the update
> icon. I checked the table structures and config values and they all seem to
> be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices anything out of the ordinary
> please let us know by posting to this mailing list (as I could have missed
> something).
> 
> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the
> plugins upgrade as well?
> 
> If anyone else has time can they test the upgrade procedure please and
> report back on success or failures!
> 
> In the next few days if no one has any problems I think I will post the
> Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1 release... Unless people think I should do it now?
> 
> For Geeklog.net I have changed a few things in the configuration:
> 
> - The default postmode is now HTML for submissions
> - The default editor is CKEditor
> - Default Cache time for new articles and staticpages is 86400 seconds (1
> day)
> - New geeklognet_theme which is based on the Modern Curve theme. It just
> contains the changed template files needed.
> 
> One bug that I notice in the error.log file  that will have to be looked
> into regarding the XMLSitemap plugin is:
> 
> Sun Mar  9 14:00:04 2014 - 192.186.69.6 - SitemapXML::sendPing: HTTP error
> code: 404
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: March-08-14 3:55 PM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I think I might have some extra time tomorrow. If I do I will update
> Geeklog.net with the latest version and release a beta instead of a release
> candidate.
> 
> If I do update Geeklog.net I will be creating a new theme based on the
> Modern Curve theme called Geeklog (for lack of a better name).  It will just
> contain the changed theme files in the directory (with the few small changes
> we make based on the
> http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Geeklog_Release_Procedures). This will
> make it easier for theme upgrades later on. 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
> Sent: March-08-14 10:39 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Upgrade/New install tests
> 
> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> Dirk if you have a second could you synch up the language files.
> 
> Done.
> 
> Kenji, could you please double-check the Japanese language file for the
> Spam-X plugin? There were a lot of changes there, but I think they were only
> changes in whitespace and line endings. Thanks.
> 
> bye, Dirk
> 
> 
> --
> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From geeklog at mystral-kk.net  Sun Mar  9 18:09:09 2014
From: geeklog at mystral-kk.net (Kenji ITO)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:09:09 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>

Tom wrote:

> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1. I
> ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none of the
> Core
> Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I had to go into
> the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by clicking the
> update
> icon. I checked the table structures and config values and they all seem
> to
> be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices anything out of the ordinary
> please let us know by posting to this mailing list (as I could have missed
> something).
>
> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the
> plugins upgrade as well?

Yes.  On my PC (Windows 7, PHP-5.5.9, Apache-2.4.7, MySQL-5.5.29), I first
installed Geeklog-1.8.0. Then, I overwrote it with the latest build and
upgraded to GL-2.1.0.  All plugins shipped with GL upgraded without issue.
 Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?
-- 
Kenji ITO
http://mystral-kk.net



From niemans at nlbox.com  Sun Mar  9 18:42:36 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:42:36 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
Message-ID: <0776E74B-A64A-45B9-8795-41ABD62422E5@nlbox.com>

> Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?

or a typo in upper/lower case filename somewhere?


On 09 Mar 2014, at 23:09, Kenji ITO <geeklog at mystral-kk.net> wrote:

> Tom wrote:
> 
>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1. I
>> ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none of the
>> Core
>> Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I had to go into
>> the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by clicking the
>> update
>> icon. I checked the table structures and config values and they all seem
>> to
>> be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices anything out of the ordinary
>> please let us know by posting to this mailing list (as I could have missed
>> something).
>> 
>> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the
>> plugins upgrade as well?
> 
> Yes.  On my PC (Windows 7, PHP-5.5.9, Apache-2.4.7, MySQL-5.5.29), I first
> installed Geeklog-1.8.0. Then, I overwrote it with the latest build and
> upgraded to GL-2.1.0.  All plugins shipped with GL upgraded without issue.
> Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?
> -- 
> Kenji ITO
> http://mystral-kk.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sun Mar  9 19:57:12 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 19:57:12 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
Message-ID: <01e001cf3bf3$4a09c640$de1d52c0$@cogeco.net>

I upgraded from 2.0.0 without issue on Windows Server 2008

When I upgraded Geeklog.net I didn't notice anything in the error.log. I
knew something was wrong though when I tried to load the homepage and it
came back with an error message about the staticpage table missing the cache
column.

The upgrade did report permission issues (mostly Filemanager directories)
which I fixed before continuing the upgrade process.

If possible can someone try a stock Geeklog upgrade on a Linux box and let
us know how it goes?

Thanks

Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Kenji ITO
Sent: March-09-14 6:09 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade

Tom wrote:

> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 
> 1. I ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none 
> of the Core Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I 
> had to go into the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by 
> clicking the update icon. I checked the table structures and config 
> values and they all seem to be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices 
> anything out of the ordinary please let us know by posting to this 
> mailing list (as I could have missed something).
>
> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the 
> plugins upgrade as well?

Yes.  On my PC (Windows 7, PHP-5.5.9, Apache-2.4.7, MySQL-5.5.29), I first
installed Geeklog-1.8.0. Then, I overwrote it with the latest build and
upgraded to GL-2.1.0.  All plugins shipped with GL upgraded without issue.
 Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?
--
Kenji ITO
http://mystral-kk.net

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Tue Mar 11 17:57:24 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:57:24 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <01e001cf3bf3$4a09c640$de1d52c0$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
	<01e001cf3bf3$4a09c640$de1d52c0$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <02ce01cf3d74$e293c730$a7bb5590$@cogeco.net>

I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1

https://www.geeklog.net/article.php/geeklog-2-1-0-beta-1

I ran a few more upgrades on a stock install and one of my other sites that
had a few other plugins installed and didn't have any issues (Windows Server
2008 and 2012).

I still have to run my backup of Geeklog net on my dev servers to see if I
can replicated the issue but if someone has a chance and uses Linux I would
appreciate feedback on if the upgrade process worked for you.

Thanks

Tom 



-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: March-09-14 7:57 PM
To: 'Geeklog Development'
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade

I upgraded from 2.0.0 without issue on Windows Server 2008

When I upgraded Geeklog.net I didn't notice anything in the error.log. I
knew something was wrong though when I tried to load the homepage and it
came back with an error message about the staticpage table missing the cache
column.

The upgrade did report permission issues (mostly Filemanager directories)
which I fixed before continuing the upgrade process.

If possible can someone try a stock Geeklog upgrade on a Linux box and let
us know how it goes?

Thanks

Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Kenji ITO
Sent: March-09-14 6:09 PM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade

Tom wrote:

> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 
> 1. I ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none 
> of the Core Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I 
> had to go into the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by 
> clicking the update icon. I checked the table structures and config 
> values and they all seem to be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices 
> anything out of the ordinary please let us know by posting to this 
> mailing list (as I could have missed something).
>
> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the 
> plugins upgrade as well?

Yes.  On my PC (Windows 7, PHP-5.5.9, Apache-2.4.7, MySQL-5.5.29), I first
installed Geeklog-1.8.0. Then, I overwrote it with the latest build and
upgraded to GL-2.1.0.  All plugins shipped with GL upgraded without issue.
 Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?
--
Kenji ITO
http://mystral-kk.net

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From cordiste at free.fr  Wed Mar 12 12:16:58 2014
From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:16:58 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <02ce01cf3d74$e293c730$a7bb5590$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
	<01e001cf3bf3$4a09c640$de1d52c0$@cogeco.net>
	<02ce01cf3d74$e293c730$a7bb5590$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <CACfYZddq6W2b83iwPJPAruP3aFMj2abXx6fOTy=_O8gDYUAupg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I just made an update from Geeklog 1.4.1 to 2.1.0 on a linux box.
Every thing seems to work but I needed to uses the Emergency Rescue
Tool to change theme setting

Log files for upgrade is :

mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:13 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to
install the 'xmlsitemap' plugin
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to create
'XMLSitemap Admin' group
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to add
'xmlsitemap' features
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
'config.xmlsitemap.tab_main' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
'config.xmlsitemap.tab_pri' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
'config.xmlsitemap.tab_freq' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
'config.xmlsitemap.tab_ping' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to give
all users in the Root group access to the 'xmlsitemap' Admin group
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Inserting default data
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Registering
'xmlsitemap' plugin
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 -
SitemapXML::sendPing: HTTP error code: 404
mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Successfully
installed the 'xmlsitemap' plugin!


I notice a navbar (css) issue with professionnal and Denim theme on
story edition pages.


Ben

2014-03-11 22:57 GMT+01:00 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
> I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1
>
> https://www.geeklog.net/article.php/geeklog-2-1-0-beta-1
>
> I ran a few more upgrades on a stock install and one of my other sites that
> had a few other plugins installed and didn't have any issues (Windows Server
> 2008 and 2012).
>
> I still have to run my backup of Geeklog net on my dev servers to see if I
> can replicated the issue but if someone has a chance and uses Linux I would
> appreciate feedback on if the upgrade process worked for you.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: March-09-14 7:57 PM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
>
> I upgraded from 2.0.0 without issue on Windows Server 2008
>
> When I upgraded Geeklog.net I didn't notice anything in the error.log. I
> knew something was wrong though when I tried to load the homepage and it
> came back with an error message about the staticpage table missing the cache
> column.
>
> The upgrade did report permission issues (mostly Filemanager directories)
> which I fixed before continuing the upgrade process.
>
> If possible can someone try a stock Geeklog upgrade on a Linux box and let
> us know how it goes?
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Kenji ITO
> Sent: March-09-14 6:09 PM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
>
> Tom wrote:
>
>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta
>> 1. I ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none
>> of the Core Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I
>> had to go into the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by
>> clicking the update icon. I checked the table structures and config
>> values and they all seem to be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices
>> anything out of the ordinary please let us know by posting to this
>> mailing list (as I could have missed something).
>>
>> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the
>> plugins upgrade as well?
>
> Yes.  On my PC (Windows 7, PHP-5.5.9, Apache-2.4.7, MySQL-5.5.29), I first
> installed Geeklog-1.8.0. Then, I overwrote it with the latest build and
> upgraded to GL-2.1.0.  All plugins shipped with GL upgraded without issue.
>  Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?
> --
> Kenji ITO
> http://mystral-kk.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>


From cordiste at free.fr  Wed Mar 12 12:33:17 2014
From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:33:17 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CACfYZddq6W2b83iwPJPAruP3aFMj2abXx6fOTy=_O8gDYUAupg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<35208.203.189.105.202.1394402949.squirrel@www.s215.xrea.com>
	<01e001cf3bf3$4a09c640$de1d52c0$@cogeco.net>
	<02ce01cf3d74$e293c730$a7bb5590$@cogeco.net>
	<CACfYZddq6W2b83iwPJPAruP3aFMj2abXx6fOTy=_O8gDYUAupg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACfYZdcCT9MFMUHRaUvp+mP=8zKowJMYP6Uz=DcjHrmKp8x=cQ@mail.gmail.com>

Not related with Geeklog core but there is an issue with mediagallery
plugin 1.6.16 that also implementes a function call COM_getEncodingt
in public_html/mediagallery/common.php file.

Ben

2014-03-12 17:16 GMT+01:00 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:
> Hi,
>
> I just made an update from Geeklog 1.4.1 to 2.1.0 on a linux box.
> Every thing seems to work but I needed to uses the Emergency Rescue
> Tool to change theme setting
>
> Log files for upgrade is :
>
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:13 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to
> install the 'xmlsitemap' plugin
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to create
> 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to add
> 'xmlsitemap' features
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
> 'config.xmlsitemap.tab_main' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
> 'config.xmlsitemap.tab_pri' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
> 'config.xmlsitemap.tab_freq' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Adding
> 'config.xmlsitemap.tab_ping' feature to the 'XMLSitemap Admin' group
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Attempting to give
> all users in the Root group access to the 'xmlsitemap' Admin group
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Inserting default data
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Registering
> 'xmlsitemap' plugin
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 -
> SitemapXML::sendPing: HTTP error code: 404
> mer. 12 mars 2014 16:45:14 GMT-1 - 84.98.47.236 - Successfully
> installed the 'xmlsitemap' plugin!
>
>
> I notice a navbar (css) issue with professionnal and Denim theme on
> story edition pages.
>
>
> Ben
>
> 2014-03-11 22:57 GMT+01:00 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>> I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1
>>
>> https://www.geeklog.net/article.php/geeklog-2-1-0-beta-1
>>
>> I ran a few more upgrades on a stock install and one of my other sites that
>> had a few other plugins installed and didn't have any issues (Windows Server
>> 2008 and 2012).
>>
>> I still have to run my backup of Geeklog net on my dev servers to see if I
>> can replicated the issue but if someone has a chance and uses Linux I would
>> appreciate feedback on if the upgrade process worked for you.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Sent: March-09-14 7:57 PM
>> To: 'Geeklog Development'
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
>>
>> I upgraded from 2.0.0 without issue on Windows Server 2008
>>
>> When I upgraded Geeklog.net I didn't notice anything in the error.log. I
>> knew something was wrong though when I tried to load the homepage and it
>> came back with an error message about the staticpage table missing the cache
>> column.
>>
>> The upgrade did report permission issues (mostly Filemanager directories)
>> which I fixed before continuing the upgrade process.
>>
>> If possible can someone try a stock Geeklog upgrade on a Linux box and let
>> us know how it goes?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tom
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Kenji ITO
>> Sent: March-09-14 6:09 PM
>> To: Geeklog Development
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
>>
>> Tom wrote:
>>
>>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta
>>> 1. I ran into an issue when upgrading. Geeklog upgraded fine but none
>>> of the Core Plugins did. The upgrade for them did not seem to run so I
>>> had to go into the Plugins Admin form and update them each manually by
>>> clicking the update icon. I checked the table structures and config
>>> values and they all seem to be correct for 2.1.0 but if anyone notices
>>> anything out of the ordinary please let us know by posting to this
>>> mailing list (as I could have missed something).
>>>
>>> Kenji ITO you mentioned you tested the upgrade without issue. Did the
>>> plugins upgrade as well?
>>
>> Yes.  On my PC (Windows 7, PHP-5.5.9, Apache-2.4.7, MySQL-5.5.29), I first
>> installed Geeklog-1.8.0. Then, I overwrote it with the latest build and
>> upgraded to GL-2.1.0.  All plugins shipped with GL upgraded without issue.
>>  Maybe, there is something wrong with permissions on *nix?
>> --
>> Kenji ITO
>> http://mystral-kk.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>


From ironmax at spacequad.com  Wed Mar 12 23:07:08 2014
From: ironmax at spacequad.com (Michael Brusletten)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:07:08 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 91, Issue 6
In-Reply-To: <mailman.11.1394632803.47525.geeklog-devel@lists.geeklog.net>
References: <mailman.11.1394632803.47525.geeklog-devel@lists.geeklog.net>
Message-ID: <6E6FFB4AC906414DB4B56BC058D3909A@Node5>

Tom,

I run the demo sites on Linux, but will not upgrade the 2.x version until 
everything is put out as production release version.  I shouldn't have to 
explain the reasons why on this.  Otherwise I would have run a test upgrade 
for you.

Michael


Message: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:57:24 -0400
From: "Tom" <websitemaster at cogeco.net>
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
To: "'Geeklog Development'" <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
Message-ID: <02ce01cf3d74$e293c730$a7bb5590$@cogeco.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1

https://www.geeklog.net/article.php/geeklog-2-1-0-beta-1

I ran a few more upgrades on a stock install and one of my other sites that
had a few other plugins installed and didn't have any issues (Windows Server
2008 and 2012).

I still have to run my backup of Geeklog net on my dev servers to see if I
can replicated the issue but if someone has a chance and uses Linux I would
appreciate feedback on if the upgrade process worked for you.

Thanks

Tom



From dirk at haun-online.de  Thu Mar 13 07:30:25 2014
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:30:25 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>

Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1.

When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front page,  
just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from  
any of the static pages that we display on the front page (About  
Geeklog is one, or the international support one, if your browser  
defaults to a language other than English).

Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/



From niemans at nlbox.com  Thu Mar 13 07:41:39 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:41:39 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
Message-ID: <F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>


Filed a bug for this already.
See http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1750

On 13 Mar 2014, at 12:30, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:

> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1.
> 
> When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front page, just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from any of the static pages that we display on the front page (About Geeklog is one, or the international support one, if your browser defaults to a language other than English).
> 
> Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?
> 
> bye, Dirk
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Thu Mar 13 09:28:05 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:28:05 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 91, Issue 6
In-Reply-To: <6E6FFB4AC906414DB4B56BC058D3909A@Node5>
References: <mailman.11.1394632803.47525.geeklog-devel@lists.geeklog.net>
	<6E6FFB4AC906414DB4B56BC058D3909A@Node5>
Message-ID: <00a201cf3ec0$110b4d30$3321e790$@cogeco.net>

Michael,

This message was directed to the development mailing list as a whole. Of
course you shouldn't upgrade the demo sites until the final release happens.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Michael
Brusletten
Sent: March-12-14 11:07 PM
To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 91, Issue 6

Tom,

I run the demo sites on Linux, but will not upgrade the 2.x version until
everything is put out as production release version.  I shouldn't have to
explain the reasons why on this.  Otherwise I would have run a test upgrade
for you.

Michael


Message: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:57:24 -0400
From: "Tom" <websitemaster at cogeco.net>
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
To: "'Geeklog Development'" <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
Message-ID: <02ce01cf3d74$e293c730$a7bb5590$@cogeco.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1

https://www.geeklog.net/article.php/geeklog-2-1-0-beta-1

I ran a few more upgrades on a stock install and one of my other sites that
had a few other plugins installed and didn't have any issues (Windows Server
2008 and 2012).

I still have to run my backup of Geeklog net on my dev servers to see if I
can replicated the issue but if someone has a chance and uses Linux I would
appreciate feedback on if the upgrade process worked for you.

Thanks

Tom

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Mon Mar 17 18:00:42 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:00:42 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Advanced Editor bug - CKEditor and Android Devices
Message-ID: <00aa01cf422c$572c77c0$05856740$@cogeco.net>

I tested this with the Geeklog comment form.

Currently if you have the CKEditor enabled and you try to submit a comment
on an Android device the CKEditor is not visible and if you type something
in the text box and hit preview the comment form does not detect any text in
the comment area and displays a message telling the user to make sure to
enter a title and a comment.

According to the CKEditor website:
http://ckeditor.com/support/faq/features#question9

CKEditor is currently disabled for Android devices (full support is
scheduled for version 5). Since this is the case the form should still at
least be able to detect the text in the text area and allow the user to
submit a comment even if the CKEditor is not visible (like how the comment
form would normally work in HTML postmode without the advanced editor). The
comment should allow html since that is what the post mode is set at.

We should also check what happens with articles and staticpages when the
advanced editor is enabled and viewing them on android devices.

See the bug report for more information:
http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1753




From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Wed Mar 19 17:27:19 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:27:19 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
	<F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>
Message-ID: <01ab01cf43ba$021d5ad0$06581070$@cogeco.net>

This problem has happened again so I have disabled template caching on
Geeklog.net. If anyone else notices a "1" where it really shouldn't be let
me know.

When I get a chance I will look into the issue.

Thanks

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: March-13-14 7:42 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade


Filed a bug for this already.
See http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1750

On 13 Mar 2014, at 12:30, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:

> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1.
> 
> When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front page,
just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from any of
the static pages that we display on the front page (About Geeklog is one, or
the international support one, if your browser defaults to a language other
than English).
> 
> Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?
> 
> bye, Dirk
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From niemans at nlbox.com  Fri Mar 21 05:57:56 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:57:56 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <01ab01cf43ba$021d5ad0$06581070$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
	<F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>
	<01ab01cf43ba$021d5ad0$06581070$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <242BB8C3-F1E3-41EF-9E8B-706582EA3940@nlbox.com>

It looks like the function file_get_contents can return a false or a false-alike since php5.

Wim

On 19 Mar 2014, at 22:27, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> This problem has happened again so I have disabled template caching on
> Geeklog.net. If anyone else notices a "1" where it really shouldn't be let
> me know.
> 
> When I get a chance I will look into the issue.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
> Sent: March-13-14 7:42 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
> 
> 
> Filed a bug for this already.
> See http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1750
> 
> On 13 Mar 2014, at 12:30, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
> 
>> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1.
>> 
>> When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front page,
> just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from any of
> the static pages that we display on the front page (About Geeklog is one, or
> the international support one, if your browser defaults to a language other
> than English).
>> 
>> Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?
>> 
>> bye, Dirk
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Fri Mar 21 06:40:05 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:40:05 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <242BB8C3-F1E3-41EF-9E8B-706582EA3940@nlbox.com>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
	<F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>
	<01ab01cf43ba$021d5ad0$06581070$@cogeco.net>
	<242BB8C3-F1E3-41EF-9E8B-706582EA3940@nlbox.com>
Message-ID: <026801cf44f1$ebdcd8c0$c3968a40$@cogeco.net>

Thanks Wim. It gives me a place to start.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: March-21-14 5:58 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade

It looks like the function file_get_contents can return a false or a
false-alike since php5.

Wim

On 19 Mar 2014, at 22:27, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> This problem has happened again so I have disabled template caching on 
> Geeklog.net. If anyone else notices a "1" where it really shouldn't be 
> let me know.
> 
> When I get a chance I will look into the issue.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim 
> Niemans
> Sent: March-13-14 7:42 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
> 
> 
> Filed a bug for this already.
> See http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1750
> 
> On 13 Mar 2014, at 12:30, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
> 
>> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1.
>> 
>> When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front 
>> page,
> just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from 
> any of the static pages that we display on the front page (About 
> Geeklog is one, or the international support one, if your browser 
> defaults to a language other than English).
>> 
>> Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?
>> 
>> bye, Dirk
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From niemans at nlbox.com  Sun Mar 23 09:10:21 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:10:21 +0100
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <026801cf44f1$ebdcd8c0$c3968a40$@cogeco.net>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
	<F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>
	<01ab01cf43ba$021d5ad0$06581070$@cogeco.net>
	<242BB8C3-F1E3-41EF-9E8B-706582EA3940@nlbox.com>
	<026801cf44f1$ebdcd8c0$c3968a40$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <AEF5A101-77C1-4E62-A750-77BD73029108@nlbox.com>

Having the code examined, learns the following:

1. the cache routines make extensive use of ?file_get_contents? and handle the return values in a buggy fashion.

2. The ?1? is generated in the function subst($varname) by returning true:

           } else if (isset($this->varvals[$varname]) OR empty($varname)) {
               return $this->slow_subst($varname);
           } else {
               // $varname does not reference a file so return
               if ($this->debug & 4) {
                   echo "<p><b>subst:</b> varname $varname does not reference a file</p>\n";
               }
               return true;
           }

3. Changing ?return true? into " return ?? ? removes the ?1? occurrence.

4. The construct is present twice in the function. See lines 705, 738.

I am not sure if this change will do, or would generate other noise. 
Though I find it most strange for return true values in this function.

After all, this ?1? is generated by parsing a unset varname ?? Really?

Wim


On 21 Mar 2014, at 11:40, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Thanks Wim. It gives me a place to start.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
> Sent: March-21-14 5:58 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
> 
> It looks like the function file_get_contents can return a false or a
> false-alike since php5.
> 
> Wim
> 
> On 19 Mar 2014, at 22:27, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> This problem has happened again so I have disabled template caching on 
>> Geeklog.net. If anyone else notices a "1" where it really shouldn't be 
>> let me know.
>> 
>> When I get a chance I will look into the issue.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim 
>> Niemans
>> Sent: March-13-14 7:42 AM
>> To: Geeklog Development
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
>> 
>> 
>> Filed a bug for this already.
>> See http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1750
>> 
>> On 13 Mar 2014, at 12:30, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta 1.
>>> 
>>> When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front 
>>> page,
>> just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from 
>> any of the static pages that we display on the front page (About 
>> Geeklog is one, or the international support one, if your browser 
>> defaults to a language other than English).
>>> 
>>> Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?
>>> 
>>> bye, Dirk
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sun Mar 23 10:36:00 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 10:36:00 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <AEF5A101-77C1-4E62-A750-77BD73029108@nlbox.com>
References: <01cb01cf3bcf$ecf2adf0$c6d809d0$@cogeco.net>
	<20140313123025.Horde.GNVY5t83qydjtwOmAJurFQ1@webmail.df.eu>
	<F73266BB-4CE6-4735-9707-48CC114D05D3@nlbox.com>
	<01ab01cf43ba$021d5ad0$06581070$@cogeco.net>
	<242BB8C3-F1E3-41EF-9E8B-706582EA3940@nlbox.com>
	<026801cf44f1$ebdcd8c0$c3968a40$@cogeco.net>
	<AEF5A101-77C1-4E62-A750-77BD73029108@nlbox.com>
Message-ID: <037701cf46a5$364e19f0$a2ea4dd0$@cogeco.net>

Thanks for finding the point where the "1" gets added. Looking at the code I
don't see anywhere that function subst gets checked if it returns true.  A
string is assumed returned and the code continues. Your fix should work fine
for at least preventing the "1" from showing.

I still need to figure out why it happens in the first place sometimes for
instance caching (why the featured story was replaced by a "1") .

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: March-23-14 9:10 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade

Having the code examined, learns the following:

1. the cache routines make extensive use of 'file_get_contents' and handle
the return values in a buggy fashion.

2. The '1' is generated in the function subst($varname) by returning true:

           } else if (isset($this->varvals[$varname]) OR empty($varname)) {
               return $this->slow_subst($varname);
           } else {
               // $varname does not reference a file so return
               if ($this->debug & 4) {
                   echo "<p><b>subst:</b> varname $varname does not
reference a file</p>\n";
               }
               return true;
           }

3. Changing 'return true' into " return '' " removes the '1' occurrence.

4. The construct is present twice in the function. See lines 705, 738.

I am not sure if this change will do, or would generate other noise. 
Though I find it most strange for return true values in this function.

After all, this '1' is generated by parsing a unset varname ?? Really?

Wim


On 21 Mar 2014, at 11:40, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Thanks Wim. It gives me a place to start.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim 
> Niemans
> Sent: March-21-14 5:58 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
> 
> It looks like the function file_get_contents can return a false or a 
> false-alike since php5.
> 
> Wim
> 
> On 19 Mar 2014, at 22:27, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> This problem has happened again so I have disabled template caching 
>> on Geeklog.net. If anyone else notices a "1" where it really 
>> shouldn't be let me know.
>> 
>> When I get a chance I will look into the issue.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim 
>> Niemans
>> Sent: March-13-14 7:42 AM
>> To: Geeklog Development
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net 2.1.0 Beta 1 Upgrade
>> 
>> 
>> Filed a bug for this already.
>> See http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1750
>> 
>> On 13 Mar 2014, at 12:30, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have updated Geeklog.net to the still unreleased Geeklog 2.1.0 Beta
1.
>>> 
>>> When you're not logged in, there's a "1" displaying on the front 
>>> page,
>> just below the "About Geeklog" block. I don't think it's coming from 
>> any of the static pages that we display on the front page (About 
>> Geeklog is one, or the international support one, if your browser 
>> defaults to a language other than English).
>>> 
>>> Could this be because we don't currently have a featured story?
>>> 
>>> bye, Dirk
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sat Mar 29 23:24:51 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:24:51 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Pagnation
Message-ID: <02ee01cf4bc7$9c941800$d5bc4800$@cogeco.net>

I need to add pagination to one of my sites:

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-an
d-relprev.html

It allows Google to know what the next and previous pages are with the
content and browsers like Firefox will prefetch the next page to allow for
faster loading.

I plan to add this to the next version of Geeklog

http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1754

At first I was think this would be easy to do with only a few small changes.
We have all of the information needed in the function
COM_printPageNavigation (ie the urls for the previous and next page). We
even have a spot in COM_createHTMLDocument that creates a bunch of link
elements  (like $relLinks['canonical']).

The problem is the function createHTMLDocument (and COM_SiteHeader)
retrieves it's data either from the parameters passed to it or by running
the custom and plugin api. COM_printPageNavigation has the information we
need but once the page navigation html is generated the urls are lost. Since
COM_createHTMLDocument isn't a class that I can access with in
COM_printPageNavigation to store the data to use later when the page is
created what suggestions do people have to handle this?

Tom





From niemans at nlbox.com  Sun Mar 30 06:19:52 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 12:19:52 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Pagnation
In-Reply-To: <02ee01cf4bc7$9c941800$d5bc4800$@cogeco.net>
References: <02ee01cf4bc7$9c941800$d5bc4800$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <35754B02-EC16-41F4-B1C3-88FBE3B3E393@nlbox.com>

It?s evident and un-avoidable that gl needs to proceed to a html-page class.
That also can be ?hidden? to the plugin or explicitly published.

My example is using a class that can store the information for later use; all output functions can -additionally- use the class, even createHtmlDocument can.
I?ve got a class called pluginFace that extends glFace as the main class (abstract).
In pluginFace the plugin content is assembled and glFace gathers all content from it?s ?children?.
The trick is defining keywords and attach content to them. A overall pageLayout variable defines the sequence these keywords will follow (in a array). This enables the plugin to generate content without knowing how the page design (or block design) is set up, so the logic has priority and the flow is much more readable. In other words, it would be very feasible to generate content in the plugin that shows up in configurable spots of the page. 
This works marvellous and the keyword ?debug? gathers (optionally) all debug output.

Example: 
pageLayout=(?menu?, ?search?, ?pagination?, ?list?, ?pagination?);
glPage::addContent(?pagination?, COM_printPagination(?..));
or
glPage::addPagination(?navigation?, ??.);
This example shows a clone feature that allows the pagination to show before AND after the list, without any extra logic. This example shows also that this can be done with BC.

Say, you have a glPage class (abstract and static) and all output functions start to store their information in that class, like glPage::setParam(type, param). The function createHtmlDocument does the same with the information array. Than the function is using solely the new class, migrating the code in suitable cases to the class.
So, a choice becomes available to generate content directly (and attach that content to the class) or just store the params that are used to generate content (later on), or even do both or use a mixed approach.

Than, adding a method like ?addResources? can obsolete the SCRIPTS class, since the class will have all information to generate a complete page. Even the functions for startBlock and endBlock can migrate to the new class. Not to mention that the class might be standardised to catch ajax calls in a geeklog way.

In the end, gl will end up with a generic page class, a configurable pageLayout (independent from themes), tiny, simple, plugable classes for blocks, addons, style elements and such.

Finally, doing so, documentation will benefit since all responses are within a single class, which may be extended if desired. lib-common just contains placeholders. All other system-libs may access the class if needed, which is nearly impossible in the current architecture. 

I am using a similar approach for exceptions.

Wim


On 30 Mar 2014, at 05:24, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> I need to add pagination to one of my sites:
> 
> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-an
> d-relprev.html
> 
> It allows Google to know what the next and previous pages are with the
> content and browsers like Firefox will prefetch the next page to allow for
> faster loading.
> 
> I plan to add this to the next version of Geeklog
> 
> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1754
> 
> At first I was think this would be easy to do with only a few small changes.
> We have all of the information needed in the function
> COM_printPageNavigation (ie the urls for the previous and next page). We
> even have a spot in COM_createHTMLDocument that creates a bunch of link
> elements  (like $relLinks['canonical']).
> 
> The problem is the function createHTMLDocument (and COM_SiteHeader)
> retrieves it's data either from the parameters passed to it or by running
> the custom and plugin api. COM_printPageNavigation has the information we
> need but once the page navigation html is generated the urls are lost. Since
> COM_createHTMLDocument isn't a class that I can access with in
> COM_printPageNavigation to store the data to use later when the page is
> created what suggestions do people have to handle this?
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sun Mar 30 11:03:13 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:03:13 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Pagnation
Message-ID: <031b01cf4c29$2bf60fb0$83e22f10$@cogeco.net>

As you said the right way to do it would be to use a class (that's a lot of
work :-). You brought up some interesting ideas with your page keyword
example. You mention your glface class. Have you already been modifying the
Geeklog core?

Right now we have 2 ways to generate a page.

The original way using the functions COM_SiteHeader, COM_SiteFooter, etc... 

The current way (as of Geeklog 2.0.0) using COM_createHTMLDocument

If for Geeklog 2.2.0 (or 3.0 or whatever we call it) we introduce a page
class we need to make sure it is backwards compatible with at least
COM_createHTMLDocument. COM_createHTMLDocument could just become a shell
function that accesses the page class directly. 

If this does get worked on we would need to figure a number of things out.
Like you said the SCRIPTS class could get integrated and a lot of the plugin
api stuff could be dropped if the page class can be accessed directly. A lot
of the stuff in lib-common could move to the class as well (as you mentioned
but backwards compatible will be an issue). We may also want to do this in
baby steps to try and keep plugins as compatible as possible.

The layout of the class will have to be thought out carefully so we can make
sure it allows for backwards compatibility and allow us to move forward
easily when we want to add new page features.

Tom
 


-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: March-30-14 6:20 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Pagnation

It's evident and un-avoidable that gl needs to proceed to a html-page class.
That also can be 'hidden' to the plugin or explicitly published.

My example is using a class that can store the information for later use;
all output functions can -additionally- use the class, even
createHtmlDocument can.
I've got a class called pluginFace that extends glFace as the main class
(abstract).
In pluginFace the plugin content is assembled and glFace gathers all content
from it's 'children'.
The trick is defining keywords and attach content to them. A overall
pageLayout variable defines the sequence these keywords will follow (in a
array). This enables the plugin to generate content without knowing how the
page design (or block design) is set up, so the logic has priority and the
flow is much more readable. In other words, it would be very feasible to
generate content in the plugin that shows up in configurable spots of the
page. 
This works marvellous and the keyword 'debug' gathers (optionally) all debug
output.

Example: 
pageLayout=('menu', 'search', 'pagination', 'list', 'pagination');
glPage::addContent('pagination', COM_printPagination(...)); or
glPage::addPagination('navigation', ...); This example shows a clone feature
that allows the pagination to show before AND after the list, without any
extra logic. This example shows also that this can be done with BC.

Say, you have a glPage class (abstract and static) and all output functions
start to store their information in that class, like glPage::setParam(type,
param). The function createHtmlDocument does the same with the information
array. Than the function is using solely the new class, migrating the code
in suitable cases to the class.
So, a choice becomes available to generate content directly (and attach that
content to the class) or just store the params that are used to generate
content (later on), or even do both or use a mixed approach.

Than, adding a method like 'addResources' can obsolete the SCRIPTS class,
since the class will have all information to generate a complete page. Even
the functions for startBlock and endBlock can migrate to the new class. Not
to mention that the class might be standardised to catch ajax calls in a
geeklog way.

In the end, gl will end up with a generic page class, a configurable
pageLayout (independent from themes), tiny, simple, plugable classes for
blocks, addons, style elements and such.

Finally, doing so, documentation will benefit since all responses are within
a single class, which may be extended if desired. lib-common just contains
placeholders. All other system-libs may access the class if needed, which is
nearly impossible in the current architecture. 

I am using a similar approach for exceptions.

Wim


On 30 Mar 2014, at 05:24, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> I need to add pagination to one of my sites:
> 
> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2011/09/pagination-with-reln
> ext-an
> d-relprev.html
> 
> It allows Google to know what the next and previous pages are with the 
> content and browsers like Firefox will prefetch the next page to allow 
> for faster loading.
> 
> I plan to add this to the next version of Geeklog
> 
> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1754
> 
> At first I was think this would be easy to do with only a few small
changes.
> We have all of the information needed in the function 
> COM_printPageNavigation (ie the urls for the previous and next page). 
> We even have a spot in COM_createHTMLDocument that creates a bunch of 
> link elements  (like $relLinks['canonical']).
> 
> The problem is the function createHTMLDocument (and COM_SiteHeader) 
> retrieves it's data either from the parameters passed to it or by 
> running the custom and plugin api. COM_printPageNavigation has the 
> information we need but once the page navigation html is generated the 
> urls are lost. Since COM_createHTMLDocument isn't a class that I can 
> access with in COM_printPageNavigation to store the data to use later 
> when the page is created what suggestions do people have to handle this?
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel



From websitemaster at cogeco.net  Sun Mar 30 11:31:54 2014
From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:31:54 -0400
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Next Geeklog Version - Feature Ideas
Message-ID: <031d01cf4c2d$2dc75070$8955f150$@cogeco.net>


What does everyone want to see in the next version of Geeklog?

Ideas I have so far:

- Create a page class (see pagination discussion)
- Cleanup of Core
	- Drop support of COM_SiteHeader, COM_SiteFooter (means a number of
popular plugins will have to get updated)
	- Drop support for LDAP and Live Journal authentication
	- Drop support for MSSQL / PGSQL ??? (One, both or none)
- HTML 5 theme (if added drop old Professional theme)
- Integrate GSOC Calendar project (Ben??)
- Including the Menu Plugin with Geeklog distributions
- Plugin Repository GSOC project

These are just some of my ideas to open up a discussion on what we want and
can accomplish. Anyone have any other ideas or comments on mine?

Based on the outcome of this discussion I will update our poor unutilized
Roadmap page :-) http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Proposed_Roadmap

Tom



From dirk at haun-online.de  Sun Mar 30 13:11:11 2014
From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:11:11 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Next Geeklog Version - Feature Ideas
In-Reply-To: <031d01cf4c2d$2dc75070$8955f150$@cogeco.net>
References: <031d01cf4c2d$2dc75070$8955f150$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <BD8281A1-9859-446A-971D-8FED3C3040D6@haun-online.de>

Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> 	- Drop support for LDAP and Live Journal authentication

Certainly drop LiveJournal (does that even work any more?).

In theory, LDAP could give us a foothold in company networks, although I?m not aware of anyone currently using it. There?s also this bug/patch: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=826


> 	- Drop support for MSSQL / PGSQL ??? (One, both or none)

Or to put it the other way around: Only keep them if someone steps forward and promises to maintain one or the other for the next release or two.


> - Integrate GSOC Calendar project (Ben??)
> - Plugin Repository GSOC project

Definitely the two most useful unused GSoC projects we have lying around.


> Anyone have any other ideas or comments on mine?

Just a minor thing and I haven?t really thought it through yet, but I?d like to have an auto ping feature (for Pingbacks and pinging search engines) when a story is auto published at a certain time. I?m blogging more these days and this is a small thing that I?m missing. Maybe it can even been done as a plugin.

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/



From niemans at nlbox.com  Mon Mar 31 04:57:26 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:57:26 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Next Geeklog Version - Feature Ideas
In-Reply-To: <031d01cf4c2d$2dc75070$8955f150$@cogeco.net>
References: <031d01cf4c2d$2dc75070$8955f150$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <596EA234-28E5-4D30-A353-6726BFC535A9@nlbox.com>


Needs that exist, not knowing if, or when yes, how they are implemented:

- proper handling of ajax requests
- a generic template (like there is for a glPlugin) for REST api's

- generic exception class
- proper exception handler

- resource class for javaScript and stylesheets, integrated in a extensionable page class

- language class wrapper to access language array?s in a multi language environment.

- better config class: add xPath capabilities

- add invitations (to fight spammer registrations)
- add a system Glossary (may pick up the glossary plugin)

- support microFormats: vcf, ics, foaf, ?.

So far, so good. The following feature is highest on my list, but a huge workload: introduce accounts.
GL supports users, userGroups and accessRights. The feature has a linux look and feel and allows for read/write access configuration per user, group, ?members?  and anonymous. The state of the art is very, very good.
The proposal is to add accounts (as a security and privacy measure). The idea is that a user (a human, not a bot), is just a user and that there is a different principal (the account) that is allowed to use the system. Though it resemble userGroups, it is not the same.
In order to use the system, there is a account created; this account has a owner, and manages the access rights.
New users must ?subscribe? to a account and the account owner can allow users to ?subscribe?.
Extrema are a installation with one account and a installation where every user has a different account. Both display backward compatibility, but need extra code in core.
Having accounts allows for deleting a certain user without loosing content. User are offered private content to share with their own, private, community. Several admin features will go in account scope.
Having accounts wil eliminate spamming since spam will be encapsulated into a account.
If ever GL moves into document management or stories will become documents, account are a must-have.

If there are more interested developers four this feature, I am willing to set up a discussion to have the specs worked out. I?ve done this before (with a LDAP at it?s heart), but it was java.

Wim

On 30 Mar 2014, at 17:31, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> 
> What does everyone want to see in the next version of Geeklog?
> 
> Ideas I have so far:
> 
> - Create a page class (see pagination discussion)
> - Cleanup of Core
> 	- Drop support of COM_SiteHeader, COM_SiteFooter (means a number of
> popular plugins will have to get updated)
> 	- Drop support for LDAP and Live Journal authentication
> 	- Drop support for MSSQL / PGSQL ??? (One, both or none)
> - HTML 5 theme (if added drop old Professional theme)
> - Integrate GSOC Calendar project (Ben??)
> - Including the Menu Plugin with Geeklog distributions
> - Plugin Repository GSOC project
> 
> These are just some of my ideas to open up a discussion on what we want and
> can accomplish. Anyone have any other ideas or comments on mine?
> 
> Based on the outcome of this discussion I will update our poor unutilized
> Roadmap page :-) http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Proposed_Roadmap
> 
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From niemans at nlbox.com  Mon Mar 31 05:03:27 2014
From: niemans at nlbox.com (Wim Niemans)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:03:27 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Pagnation
In-Reply-To: <031b01cf4c29$2bf60fb0$83e22f10$@cogeco.net>
References: <031b01cf4c29$2bf60fb0$83e22f10$@cogeco.net>
Message-ID: <6CCDEA4B-3701-4F1B-8A8D-451114407C79@nlbox.com>


There is no need to patch any core, and I did not. 
Except some bugs of which I know that are contained in the next release.
Though I duplicated ADMIN_list and ADMIN_menu because they interfere with sql navigation.

And I don?t think it is a lot of work, unless testing is meant.
In order to give this a go, there should be a correct plugin repository and maybe a generic procedure to get a plugin supported.

Wim

On 30 Mar 2014, at 17:03, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> As you said the right way to do it would be to use a class (that's a lot of
> work :-). You brought up some interesting ideas with your page keyword
> example. You mention your glface class. Have you already been modifying the
> Geeklog core?
> 
> Right now we have 2 ways to generate a page.
> 
> The original way using the functions COM_SiteHeader, COM_SiteFooter, etc... 
> 
> The current way (as of Geeklog 2.0.0) using COM_createHTMLDocument
> 
> If for Geeklog 2.2.0 (or 3.0 or whatever we call it) we introduce a page
> class we need to make sure it is backwards compatible with at least
> COM_createHTMLDocument. COM_createHTMLDocument could just become a shell
> function that accesses the page class directly. 
> 
> If this does get worked on we would need to figure a number of things out.
> Like you said the SCRIPTS class could get integrated and a lot of the plugin
> api stuff could be dropped if the page class can be accessed directly. A lot
> of the stuff in lib-common could move to the class as well (as you mentioned
> but backwards compatible will be an issue). We may also want to do this in
> baby steps to try and keep plugins as compatible as possible.
> 
> The layout of the class will have to be thought out carefully so we can make
> sure it allows for backwards compatibility and allow us to move forward
> easily when we want to add new page features.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Wim Niemans
> Sent: March-30-14 6:20 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Pagnation
> 
> It's evident and un-avoidable that gl needs to proceed to a html-page class.
> That also can be 'hidden' to the plugin or explicitly published.
> 
> My example is using a class that can store the information for later use;
> all output functions can -additionally- use the class, even
> createHtmlDocument can.
> I've got a class called pluginFace that extends glFace as the main class
> (abstract).
> In pluginFace the plugin content is assembled and glFace gathers all content
> from it's 'children'.
> The trick is defining keywords and attach content to them. A overall
> pageLayout variable defines the sequence these keywords will follow (in a
> array). This enables the plugin to generate content without knowing how the
> page design (or block design) is set up, so the logic has priority and the
> flow is much more readable. In other words, it would be very feasible to
> generate content in the plugin that shows up in configurable spots of the
> page. 
> This works marvellous and the keyword 'debug' gathers (optionally) all debug
> output.
> 
> Example: 
> pageLayout=('menu', 'search', 'pagination', 'list', 'pagination');
> glPage::addContent('pagination', COM_printPagination(...)); or
> glPage::addPagination('navigation', ...); This example shows a clone feature
> that allows the pagination to show before AND after the list, without any
> extra logic. This example shows also that this can be done with BC.
> 
> Say, you have a glPage class (abstract and static) and all output functions
> start to store their information in that class, like glPage::setParam(type,
> param). The function createHtmlDocument does the same with the information
> array. Than the function is using solely the new class, migrating the code
> in suitable cases to the class.
> So, a choice becomes available to generate content directly (and attach that
> content to the class) or just store the params that are used to generate
> content (later on), or even do both or use a mixed approach.
> 
> Than, adding a method like 'addResources' can obsolete the SCRIPTS class,
> since the class will have all information to generate a complete page. Even
> the functions for startBlock and endBlock can migrate to the new class. Not
> to mention that the class might be standardised to catch ajax calls in a
> geeklog way.
> 
> In the end, gl will end up with a generic page class, a configurable
> pageLayout (independent from themes), tiny, simple, plugable classes for
> blocks, addons, style elements and such.
> 
> Finally, doing so, documentation will benefit since all responses are within
> a single class, which may be extended if desired. lib-common just contains
> placeholders. All other system-libs may access the class if needed, which is
> nearly impossible in the current architecture. 
> 
> I am using a similar approach for exceptions.
> 
> Wim
> 
> 
> On 30 Mar 2014, at 05:24, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> 
>> I need to add pagination to one of my sites:
>> 
>> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2011/09/pagination-with-reln
>> ext-an
>> d-relprev.html
>> 
>> It allows Google to know what the next and previous pages are with the 
>> content and browsers like Firefox will prefetch the next page to allow 
>> for faster loading.
>> 
>> I plan to add this to the next version of Geeklog
>> 
>> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1754
>> 
>> At first I was think this would be easy to do with only a few small
> changes.
>> We have all of the information needed in the function 
>> COM_printPageNavigation (ie the urls for the previous and next page). 
>> We even have a spot in COM_createHTMLDocument that creates a bunch of 
>> link elements  (like $relLinks['canonical']).
>> 
>> The problem is the function createHTMLDocument (and COM_SiteHeader) 
>> retrieves it's data either from the parameters passed to it or by 
>> running the custom and plugin api. COM_printPageNavigation has the 
>> information we need but once the page navigation html is generated the 
>> urls are lost. Since COM_createHTMLDocument isn't a class that I can 
>> access with in COM_printPageNavigation to store the data to use later 
>> when the page is created what suggestions do people have to handle this?
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 



From cordiste at free.fr  Mon Mar 31 09:22:20 2014
From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:22:20 +0200
Subject: [geeklog-devel] Next Geeklog Version - Feature Ideas
In-Reply-To: <596EA234-28E5-4D30-A353-6726BFC535A9@nlbox.com>
References: <031d01cf4c2d$2dc75070$8955f150$@cogeco.net>
	<596EA234-28E5-4D30-A353-6726BFC535A9@nlbox.com>
Message-ID: <CACfYZddDiVzfzmxHuE0DOJS-EJRcnsxA4iCvDMWiv-sjz0nj5A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Here are my top feature requests:

1. An admin page for comments, with comments list, delete and edition
links will be helpfull.
2. Rename staticpages plugin to pages plugin or allow name
customisation for the folder public_html/staticpages
3. A tool to check files from a geeklog install to get list of
modified files, files that are not part of the distribution...
4. A function to filter submitted variable like

/**
 * Filters submitted variables
 *
 * Uses geeklog functions to filter submitted variables for illegal
content.  Any editing is
 * done in place and no value is returned
 *
 * @param array $vars associative array of variable name => type (type
in (number,alpha,text,html))
 * @param array &$arr reference to associative array of variable name => value
 */
function paypal_filterVars($vars, &$arr) {
    // cycle through each variable applying the appropriate filter
    foreach ($vars as $var => $type) {
        switch ($type) {
            case 'number':
                $arr[$var] = COM_applyFilter($arr[$var], true);
                break;

            case 'html':
                $arr[$var] = COM_checkHTML($arr[$var], 'paypal.admin');
                break;

            case 'text':
                $arr[$var] =
htmlspecialchars(strip_tags(COM_stripslashes($arr[$var])));
                break;

            case 'alpha':
            default:
                $arr[$var] = COM_applyFilter($arr[$var], false);
                break;
        }
    }
}


Maybe we could also  publish a story on geeklog.net to ask ideas to
the community and publish a poll with the 10 or 20 big ideas.

Ben

2014-03-31 10:57 GMT+02:00 Wim Niemans <niemans at nlbox.com>:
>
> Needs that exist, not knowing if, or when yes, how they are implemented:
>
> - proper handling of ajax requests
> - a generic template (like there is for a glPlugin) for REST api's
>
> - generic exception class
> - proper exception handler
>
> - resource class for javaScript and stylesheets, integrated in a extensionable page class
>
> - language class wrapper to access language array's in a multi language environment.
>
> - better config class: add xPath capabilities
>
> - add invitations (to fight spammer registrations)
> - add a system Glossary (may pick up the glossary plugin)
>
> - support microFormats: vcf, ics, foaf, ....
>
> So far, so good. The following feature is highest on my list, but a huge workload: introduce accounts.
> GL supports users, userGroups and accessRights. The feature has a linux look and feel and allows for read/write access configuration per user, group, 'members'  and anonymous. The state of the art is very, very good.
> The proposal is to add accounts (as a security and privacy measure). The idea is that a user (a human, not a bot), is just a user and that there is a different principal (the account) that is allowed to use the system. Though it resemble userGroups, it is not the same.
> In order to use the system, there is a account created; this account has a owner, and manages the access rights.
> New users must 'subscribe' to a account and the account owner can allow users to 'subscribe'.
> Extrema are a installation with one account and a installation where every user has a different account. Both display backward compatibility, but need extra code in core.
> Having accounts allows for deleting a certain user without loosing content. User are offered private content to share with their own, private, community. Several admin features will go in account scope.
> Having accounts wil eliminate spamming since spam will be encapsulated into a account.
> If ever GL moves into document management or stories will become documents, account are a must-have.
>
> If there are more interested developers four this feature, I am willing to set up a discussion to have the specs worked out. I've done this before (with a LDAP at it's heart), but it was java.
>
> Wim
>
> On 30 Mar 2014, at 17:31, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> What does everyone want to see in the next version of Geeklog?
>>
>> Ideas I have so far:
>>
>> - Create a page class (see pagination discussion)
>> - Cleanup of Core
>>       - Drop support of COM_SiteHeader, COM_SiteFooter (means a number of
>> popular plugins will have to get updated)
>>       - Drop support for LDAP and Live Journal authentication
>>       - Drop support for MSSQL / PGSQL ??? (One, both or none)
>> - HTML 5 theme (if added drop old Professional theme)
>> - Integrate GSOC Calendar project (Ben??)
>> - Including the Menu Plugin with Geeklog distributions
>> - Plugin Repository GSOC project
>>
>> These are just some of my ideas to open up a discussion on what we want and
>> can accomplish. Anyone have any other ideas or comments on mine?
>>
>> Based on the outcome of this discussion I will update our poor unutilized
>> Roadmap page :-) http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Proposed_Roadmap
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>