[geeklog-devtalk] Geeklog 2 / Geeklog 1.x & Plugin process

[Dirk Haun]

Oliver,


>I have seen the thread in the gl forum about trinity pushing some

>components of gl into plugins


For reference, the discussion is here:
<http://www.geeklog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=49083>



>Are there any who oppose the slicing of geeklog into many plugins

>already in the 1.3 base?


I'm not opposed to the idea. My main concern, though, is about backward
compatibility of the URLs, especially for those who can't use .htaccess.

In other words: After upgrading to a version where, say, the calendar is
a plugin, the old links should still work as before. This could be done
by replacing calender.php with a simple script that forwards to the new
URLs, for example.



>How much does it make sense to develop a complex plugin?


If you need it now, do it now.

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.haun-online.de/
http://www.tinyweb.de/