From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Jun 1 11:27:32 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 08:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [geeklog-users] Poll block Message-ID: <20030601152732.24816.qmail@web21302.mail.yahoo.com> Is there a hack or something that I can change that will allow me to set polls where users can select a specific numbers of options. Example Select your 2 favorite colors Blue Green Red Orange etc etc I hope I am being clear. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Jun 2 21:01:12 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:01:12 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] install help Message-ID: <73BCFA8FBF56184FA7A30B748DF408D839C6@web1.tdshetler.com> I'm trying to install geeklog and I get pass Step 2 of 2 and it goes to show me success.php and I get: No input file specified. I think because it is looking here: admin/install/success.php When it should have public_html in there but isn't. Any ideas???? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Jun 5 23:21:26 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 23:21:26 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Theme Help Message-ID: I'm in the midst of creating a new theme and I need some help with the GL coding and some php or javascript. At the top of the screen I'm going to put a login link, which I would like to either of the following: 1] When the 'login' text is clicked a pop-up window appears for the user to login. Once they login it refreshes the page they are on, just like the current geeklog, and then have text for login change to logoff. 2] I can do half of this, use the login link to go to the login page. Once they've logged on I'd like the login text to change to logoff. This is probably easy, but I can't seem to wrap my head around it. Thanks, Shane MacDonald Founder/Editor-In-Chief Site Administrator shane at eyecravedvd.com www.eyecravedvd.com From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Fri Jun 6 03:42:19 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:42:19 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Theme Help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030606074219.27005@smtp.haun-online.de> Shane MacDonald wrote: >1] When the 'login' text is clicked a pop-up window appears for the user to >login. Yikes. I would vote against that for two simple reasons: 1. Popups, in any form, are annoying. 2. User who have Javascript switched off will not be able to log in. >2] I can do half of this, use the login link to go to the login page. Once >they've logged on I'd like the login text to change to logoff. This story may be of interest to you: bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Fri Jun 6 11:03:53 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:03:53 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Theme Help In-Reply-To: <20030606074219.27005@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Thanks Dirk. I was thinking more about the pop-up thing last night, after I'd sent the e-mail, and remembered I hate pop-ups so why should I put one on purpose on my website. Geez, I remember reading that story a few months back, but I could find it on a search. That's why I thought I'd ask. Thanks again, Shane -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:42 AM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Theme Help Shane MacDonald wrote: >1] When the 'login' text is clicked a pop-up window appears for the user to >login. Yikes. I would vote against that for two simple reasons: 1. Popups, in any form, are annoying. 2. User who have Javascript switched off will not be able to log in. >2] I can do half of this, use the login link to go to the login page. Once >they've logged on I'd like the login text to change to logoff. This story may be of interest to you: bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Jun 9 14:06:46 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:06:46 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Static pages: text repeated on db insert Message-ID: <2222578D-9AA5-11D7-AA82-000393113608@jungle.ca> I am running Geeklog on two sites, my own and that of a volunteer organization to which I belong. Both are 1.37sr2, but the one that works has the 0.1 static page module and the other has 1.2. The one that works posts static pages in the normal way. The 1.2 version repeats chunks of data (in this case text and html pasted from a text editor into the static page editor form). It's almost as if the application started writing the data to the column, and then decided it was having too much fun decided to turn back a few paragraphs and started again. Here is an example of what happens: http://www.jungle.ca/staticpages/index.php?page=20030609141452254 I have tried to match the configs on the two servers as much as I can. Both are PHP 4.2.2, on Apache 2.0. The working server has GPC_magic_quotes on, while the broken one had all magic_quotes off. Turning GPC magic_quotes on on the broken server didn't help. Both have register globals on. On the MySQL side, the working server has 3.23.52, whereas my broken one has 3.23.56 Both working and broken sites have the same lib_common.php - apart from the comments stuff, which has formatting changes only in the broken site. I'd like it if I didn't have to go back to the old plugin, but the status quo is unworkable. cmkl -- Chris Lawson Jungle Internet http://www.jungle.ca From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Jun 9 20:54:13 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 02:54:13 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] email problems upon registration Message-ID: <001001c32eea$d2e60220$a2c19dd5@killer> Hi! I found several solutions to the problem I encountered but none of them helped me. The problem is the following: No password is sent upon registration of a new user. However, both before and after I made the suggested change, one could send Emails via the user profile based form. That works fine. The change I did was given at http://www.geeklog.net/article.php?story=20030514004238438#comments ****Here's a fix: In admin/mail.php find the line that starts with if (!mail($til, stripslashes ($vars['subject']), ... and replace the "$til" with "$A['email']", i.e. if (!mail($A['email'], stripslashes ($vars['subject']), ...**** Well, It didn't help. TIA, Giorgi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Jun 9 18:11:19 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:11:19 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] email problems upon registration In-Reply-To: <001001c32eea$d2e60220$a2c19dd5@killer> References: <001001c32eea$d2e60220$a2c19dd5@killer> Message-ID: <20030609221119.2411@smtp.haun-online.de> Giorgi wrote: >No password is sent upon registration of a new user. [...] >****Here's a fix: In admin/mail.php find the line that starts with [...] >Well, It didn't help. That's not surprising, since that piece of code is for the "Mail Users" function (in the Admin menu) and has nothing to do with the function that emails the passwords ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Jun 10 15:17:02 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:17:02 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] email problems upon registration References: <001001c32eea$d2e60220$a2c19dd5@killer> <20030609221119.2411@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <000501c32f84$e24ecef0$65c19dd5@killer> Oops, I see :( What should be done then? Are more details to describe the problem needed? Giorgi ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:11 AM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] email problems upon registration > Giorgi wrote: > > >No password is sent upon registration of a new user. > [...] > >****Here's a fix: In admin/mail.php find the line that starts with > [...] > >Well, It didn't help. > > That's not surprising, since that piece of code is for the "Mail Users" > function (in the Admin menu) and has nothing to do with the function that > emails the passwords ... > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Jun 10 19:36:05 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:36:05 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Problem with User Registration Message-ID: <3EE66B65.8020904@knightswood.net> I downloaded and installed Geeklog - all seemed to go well. I installed to /home/geeklog, and gave apache full ownership of the directory. Then I made the virtual site point to that directory. Everything loads up just fine. I can register a new user just fine, but the email that should be sent to the new user when they register never arrives in their inbox. This is on a Gentoo Linux 1.4 system, which is serving email for me and my family with sendmail. Looking at /var/log/syslog, I see the following entry: Jun 9 19:19:29 lancelot sendmail[25209]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(apache): can not write to queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=209): Permission denied The /var/spool/clientmqueue directory is owned by UID/GID smmsp, and has owner/group perms for read/write/execute, but no "other" perms at all. I've tried adding apache to the smmsp group, and that didn't help. I don't want to mess with perms on that clientmqueue directory, for fear of causing a security problem, or worse, breaking my mail server. Any ideas? Thanks, Steven From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Jun 14 17:47:54 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:47:54 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I recently downloaded a program for OS X that encodes mailto links using javascript so that web-crawlers can't identify the mailto link. Given the amount of spam that I get for my geeklog administrator mailbox, this seemed to be a useful addition. How would I embed the following javascript code into one of my blocks that has a link for sending messages? Do I need to create a php block to do this or can I do this in a normal block? What, if anything would I have to escape to make this work?The code is the encrypted result of the mailto link created by the program "Enkoder". Norman Cohen nacohen at mac.com - ------------------ Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+65gRlBPrCqr3tskRAtjrAJ9nEvpupB/LtO1aBg6benQGuMqlvACfZM0p ycXHfpiKCBnUaAVn6SrCeeM= =WQC7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Jun 14 23:13:06 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 10:13:06 +0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1055646786.3eebe4422e6a1@iteachnet.org> Dear Geeklog-ers, Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke was superior. If you have a moment to lend a critical eye to the exact claims and respond, I'd be grateful: http://opensourceschools.org/article.php?story=20030614125833623 Sincerely, David Long-time satified Geeklog customer -- http://www.iteachnet.org http://members.iteachnet.org/webzine * http://opensourceschools.org * http://www.rose-marie.ac.th * ------------------------------------------------ http://members.iteachnet.org/ http://www.opensourceschools.org/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Jun 15 02:11:40 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 02:11:40 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geekary/mycal search problem References: <1055646786.3eebe4422e6a1@iteachnet.org> Message-ID: <000901c33305$025fed40$6501a8c0@hvc.rr.com> Hi folks, I have the latest gl, geekary and mycal installed. The geekary seems to be breaking the search with an error ....( 1064: You have an error in your SQL syntax near '' at line 1) any ideas how to fix the geekary search? Thanx From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Jun 15 01:30:30 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:30:30 +1000 Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks References: <1055646786.3eebe4422e6a1@iteachnet.org> Message-ID: <03cd01c332ff$3cc26d10$0707070a@holmw2k> I'll put in my 2 cents. I am only a short-term geeklog user (last month or two). I chose Geeklog because of its security model. The article has some good points. . .but I really don't think the user has tried to use access levels much. I will have to agree that Postnuke has many more modules (the LDAP module and shopping cart module are two that I would like to be able to have), but when it comes to configuring security/access levels, there is no comparison. Postnuke needs a lot of work on the security side to even compare with Geeklog (especially with easy of setting security levels). It does have a more polished look and many more out-of-the-box features. . .but unless you are running a site in which all info is publically accessible, have fun. Anyway, my 1.5 cents, TechFan ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks > Dear Geeklog-ers, > > Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka > opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke was > superior. If you have a moment to lend a critical eye to the exact claims and > respond, I'd be grateful: > http://opensourceschools.org/article.php?story=20030614125833623 > > Sincerely, > > David > Long-time satified Geeklog customer > > -- > http://www.iteachnet.org > http://members.iteachnet.org/webzine * > http://opensourceschools.org * > http://www.rose-marie.ac.th * > > > ------------------------------------------------ > http://members.iteachnet.org/ > http://www.opensourceschools.org/ > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Jun 15 15:57:09 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:57:09 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks Message-ID: <002d01c33378$4f940a60$7e59f7a5@lm76> PostNuke was one of a few forks formed by a huge fallout among PhpNuke developers. Last year, it had its own fallout where the majority of its developers walked away. Since then, PostNuke has lacked direction and hasn't made much progress on its core code. They had been evolving their code to where each release was drastically different which was very hard on users. All the themes and modules were breaking badly on each new release. It required module/theme developers to do major rewrites each time instead of just minor tweaks. In a way it was good they slowed down to a full stop. The bad thing was they promised the next major code revamp would be out first quarter of this year. It wasn't until about a week or two ago they finally told people why the promised release never materialized. They lost a huge amount of code which they say was due to hard disk failure but was really because yet another developer walked away. Things haven't progressed as they originally envisioned. PostNuke has some features I wish Geeklog would adopt. Many of the modules are very nice too. I think the module developers are the real reason users have kept an interest. The majority of the modules are not using the API though so they aren't hooked into the site's search, stats, etc. Some include their own separate search capability. When I tried PostNuke, it ran extremely slow when safe_mode was on. Even with it off, it ran slower than Geeklog. If you're running a site where all the info is either viewable to the public or admin it's an okay system. If you want to do fine grain security, forget it. Their security system is awful. Well, it does work, but it is so damn hard to understand. Most people either don't touch the default settings or have to ask each time they want to do something. The html to create pages is interwoven in the code. If you want to create a unique new theme, you either have to fiddle with code or install one of the template plugins which are not compatible across each other. Every time I used the control panel, I wanted to tear the code apart and completely redo it. There were many things that didn't seem in the right place to me or could have been done better. Although Geeklog lacks some of the features, I never had the same urge. Personally, I think it would benefit us to do a survey across the different CMS' to see what features others had now to get ideas on how to improve our own. As for the guy who thinks PostNuke is hands down the best, let's see if his attitude changes if they can ever get the next major revamp completed and released. They have a phased plan which entails several major revamps for them to reach their 1.0 goal. John ----- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 10:13:06 +0700 To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Reply-To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Dear Geeklog-ers, Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke was superior. If you have a moment to lend a critical eye to the exact claims and respond, I'd be grateful: http://opensourceschools.org/article.php?story=20030614125833623 Sincerely, David Long-time satified Geeklog customer From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Jun 15 16:17:50 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:17:50 +0200 Subject: Fwd: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks Message-ID: <20030615201750.28481@smtp.haun-online.de> (when replying to a post, please make sure you're replying to the list, not the list admin account -- Dirk) ---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ---------------- The javascript can be taken as written here without escaping anything and placed right into a normal block. It should work fine. To avoid email bots, I use my profile's email form instead and an.htaccess file to ban all the bad bots. John ---- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:47:54 -0700 To: Geeklog From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks Reply-To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I recently downloaded a program for OS X that encodes mailto links using javascript so that web-crawlers can't identify the mailto link. Given the amount of spam that I get for my geeklog administrator mailbox, this seemed to be a useful addition. How would I embed the following javascript code into one of my blocks that has a link for sending messages? Do I need to create a php block to do this or can I do this in a normal block? What, if anything would I have to escape to make this work?The code is the encrypted result of the mailto link created by the program "Enkoder". Norman Cohen nacohen at mac.com ----------------- End Of Forwarded Message ----------------- -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Jun 15 23:42:43 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:42:43 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks In-Reply-To: <20030615201750.28481@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <968E7586-9FAC-11D7-8581-000393A34F1A@mac.com> Thanks for responding. I just tried it in a normal block and got nothing. I then viewed the html source and noted that
were put after each line of the javascript...presumably leading to problems with the javascript interpreter appropriately identifying the code. Any other ideas? Thanks, Norm On Sunday, June 15, 2003, at 01:17 PM, geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > > The javascript can be taken as written here without escaping > anything and placed right into a normal block. It should work > fine. To avoid email bots, I use my profile's email form instead > and an.htaccess file to ban all the bad bots. > > John > ---- > > Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:47:54 -0700 > To: Geeklog > From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net > Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks > Reply-To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I recently downloaded a program for OS X that encodes mailto > links > using javascript so that web-crawlers can't identify the mailto > link. > Given the amount of spam that I get for my geeklog administrator > mailbox, this seemed to be a useful addition. How would I embed > the > following javascript code into one of my blocks that has a link > for > sending messages? Do I need to create a php block to do this or > can I > do this in a normal block? What, if anything would I have to > escape to > make this work?The code is the encrypted result of the mailto > link > created by the program "Enkoder". > > > > > Norman Cohen > nacohen at mac.com > > ----------------- End Of Forwarded Message --------------- Norman Cohen nacohen at mac.com ------------------ Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Jun 16 02:43:05 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:43:05 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Re: geeklog-users digest, Vol 1 #101 - 4 msgs In-Reply-To: <20030615170002.13374.61536.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: I'm not PHP expert by any means. I just tried this and put the code created in an file and I included that file on my website with a . The email address on the bottom of this page was done that way: sbmbc.com. I assume just putting the text on the page will work, but presumably you tried this or you wouldn't be writing. What Enkoder does doesn't seem to have anything to do with PHP, it's just HTML. I suspect I'm missing something about Geeklog here that is making this more complicated. PS thanks for the info about the program. I had been meaning to do something like this for a long time. PSS. My first posting to the group. Hope all is in order. But since I don't know much about what I'm writing about here, I expect some follow-up On Sunday, Jun 15, 2003, at 10:00 US/Pacific, geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > I recently downloaded a program for OS X that encodes mailto links > using javascript so that web-crawlers can't identify the mailto link. > Given the amount of spam that I get for my geeklog administrator > mailbox, this seemed to be a useful addition. How would I embed the > following javascript code into one of my blocks that has a link for > sending messages? Do I need to create a php block to do this or can I > do this in a normal block? What, if anything would I have to escape to > make this work?The code is the encrypted result of the mailto link > created by the program "Enkoder". -- scratch.AT.linkline.com Hermosa Beach CA USA From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Jun 16 04:13:10 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:13:10 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks In-Reply-To: <968E7586-9FAC-11D7-8581-000393A34F1A@mac.com> References: <968E7586-9FAC-11D7-8581-000393A34F1A@mac.com> Message-ID: <20030616081310.19518@smtp.haun-online.de> Norm wrote: >I just tried it in a normal block and got >nothing. I then viewed the html source and noted that
were put >after each line of the javascript... Since Geeklog doesn't know whether the block contains HTML or plain text, it looks at the very first character of the block content. If it's a '<', it assumes it's HTML and doesn't apply nl2br() to the block content. So if the