[geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks

[geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net]

I'll put in my 2 cents.  I am only a short-term geeklog user (last month or
two).  I chose Geeklog because of its security model.  The article has some
good points. . .but I really don't think the user has tried to use access
levels much.  I will have to agree that Postnuke has many more modules (the
LDAP module and shopping cart module are two that I would like to be able to
have), but when it comes to configuring security/access levels, there is no
comparison.  Postnuke needs a lot of work on the security side to even
compare with Geeklog (especially with easy of setting security levels).  It
does have a more polished look and many more out-of-the-box features. . .but
unless you are running a site in which all info is publically accessible,
have fun.

Anyway, my 1.5 cents,

TechFan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net>
To: <geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks


> Dear Geeklog-ers,
>
> Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka
> opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke
was
> superior.  If you have a moment to lend a critical eye to the exact claims
and
> respond, I'd be grateful:
> http://opensourceschools.org/article.php?story=20030614125833623
>
> Sincerely,
>
> David
> Long-time satified Geeklog customer
>
> -- 
> http://www.iteachnet.org
> http://members.iteachnet.org/webzine *
> http://opensourceschools.org *
> http://www.rose-marie.ac.th *
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> http://members.iteachnet.org/
> http://www.opensourceschools.org/
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-users mailing list
> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users
>
>