[geeklog-devel] Re: [tony at tonybibbs.com: Article: Geeklog isn't Nuke] (fwd)

[Tony Bibbs]

FYI, I will probably do a short write up on this...

-- 
Tony Bibbs          "I guess you have to remember that those who don't
tony at tonybibbs.com  hunt or fish often see those of us who do as      
                    harmlessly strange and sort of amusing. When you  
                    think about it, that might be a fair assessment." 
                    --Unknown


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:54:32 -0800
From: Don donmarti Marti <dmarti at ssc.com>
To: tony at tonybibbs.com
Subject: Re: [tony at tonybibbs.com: Article: Geeklog isn't Nuke]

Tony,

> However, Geeklog is not a fork of PHP-Nuke. Anybody who compares the 
> engines of the two can see that.  Furthermore, such an assertion 
> detracts from the time and effort that many people and put into Geeklog 
> to make it into what it has become.  So, instead of simply complaining 
> about this assertion, I thought an article highlighting what Geeklog is, 
> how it differs from other weblogs and where it is going would be a 
> fitting follow-up article...unless, of course, you think readers are 
> bored with them.

If you're interested in doing an article on Geeklog, please send
me an outline.  We have a lot of readers who like this kind of stuff.

-- 
Don Marti      
Editor in Chief                 dmarti at linuxjournal.com
Linux Journal                   Phone: 650-967-1840     
http://linuxjournal.com/        Linux Journal editorial office: 206-782-9011