[geeklog-devel] GL2 and CVS

Tony Bibbs tony at tonybibbs.com
Fri Dec 17 13:46:56 EST 2004

Subversion is fine.  I've read enough and see a lot of reputable 
projects moving to it.  And, if we need any other reason for dropping 
CVS, it's not being actively developed near as much.

My question still stands, though ;-)


Vincent Furia wrote:

>CVS or Subversion?  I'd like to see us switch to subversion as CVS
>support seems to be dropping off rapidly.  Switching from CVS to
>subversion, from a user perspective, isn't too horrible a change if
>you spend just a little time with the subversion documentation. 
>Obviously if we're voting on this, my vote goes to subversion.
>On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:25:22 -0600, Tony Bibbs <tony at tonybibbs.com> wrote:
>>At what point should I start checking stuff into CVS?  I've yet another
>>modified database schema that I added timezone stuff too along with
>>changes per Vinny's suggestions in his last email.  I didn't touch the
>>date/time fields yet.
>>Anyway, my point is I have a Propel build so do you want me to CVS this
>>as the first version or simply wait until we iron all the outstanding
>>database issues?
>>geeklog-devel mailing list
>>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>geeklog-devel mailing list
>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

More information about the geeklog-devel mailing list