[geeklog-devel] GL2 and CVS

[Tony Bibbs]

Ok, the server I have at the colo is on a fairly recent version of 
Apache 1.  Subversion requires Apache 2 so I'll need to upgrade apache 
first.  That said, I'll probably start it off in CVS since, I hear, that 
Subversion can convert CVS repositories over.

--Tony

Tony Bibbs wrote:

> Subversion is fine.  I've read enough and see a lot of reputable 
> projects moving to it.  And, if we need any other reason for dropping 
> CVS, it's not being actively developed near as much.
>
> My question still stands, though ;-)
>
> --Tony
>
> Vincent Furia wrote:
>
>> CVS or Subversion?  I'd like to see us switch to subversion as CVS
>> support seems to be dropping off rapidly.  Switching from CVS to
>> subversion, from a user perspective, isn't too horrible a change if
>> you spend just a little time with the subversion documentation. 
>> Obviously if we're voting on this, my vote goes to subversion.
>>
>> -Vinny
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:25:22 -0600, Tony Bibbs <tony at tonybibbs.com> 
>> wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> At what point should I start checking stuff into CVS?  I've yet another
>>> modified database schema that I added timezone stuff too along with
>>> changes per Vinny's suggestions in his last email.  I didn't touch the
>>> date/time fields yet.
>>>
>>> Anyway, my point is I have a Propel build so do you want me to CVS this
>>> as the first version or simply wait until we iron all the outstanding
>>> database issues?
>>>
>>> --Tony
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>
>>>   
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel