[geeklog-devel] Home-made problems with forum spam
Tom Willett
tomw at pigstye.net
Fri Feb 11 14:06:34 EST 2005
On 2/11/2005 1:49 PM, Dirk Haun wrote:
>Tom,
>
>
>
>>It seems to me by the time you get here you have already done most of
>>the processing (when lib-common is included), about all you would save
>>is the template processing and a small portion of the bandwidth.
>>
>>
>
>The code I was quoting was the one that processes a post, e.g. in the
>forum plugin. Currently, we then send a redirect to index.php, which the
>spammer's scripts now seem to follow. So rendering index.php causes extra
>load - it's an entirely separate HTTP request.
>
>I was proposing that instead of the redirect we abort the script right
>when we recognized the post as being spam and output a short message
>instead there and then.
>
>bye, Dirk
>
>
>
>
Ok I thought you were going back through the whole process again. If
you just aborted it when spam was detected that might help with the load
a bit.
I had someone trying to download for offline use a site I have with
almost 2000 stories. The person was very impolite and was asking for a
story a second ate up all my bandwidth and brought the site to its
knees. I put them in the geeklog ban (which just stops processing when
it hits a ban an exits) but it didn't help because even though it didn't
get anything he kept on coming and the server load stayed about the
same. I finally instituted an apache rewrite ban that freed up my
bandwidth and server resources. For that reason I am skeptical of any
technique that causes geeklog to be loaded even though it doesn't return
much.
--
Tom Willett
tomw at pigstye.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20050211/e1296889/attachment.html>
More information about the geeklog-devel
mailing list