[geeklog-devel] GL2 and site relationships
tony at tonybibbs.com
Wed Jan 5 14:50:15 EST 2005
Vincent Furia wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:54:13 -0600, Tony Bibbs <tony at tonybibbs.com> wrote:
>>Let me try explaining this another way.
>>The first relationship would be independent. In 1.3.x there is no way
>>to do this. If you want two unrelated sites running under the same
>>database...forget about it. In this the sites are truly separate with
>>their own users, their own groups, own content.
>I thought this could be done in 1.3.x by changing the table prefix?
>Are you talking independent sites sharing the same tables?
>think that would be a good idea.
Depends on the scenario. Take, for example, a company wanting to do
cobranded stuff...where basically two sites share basic features but are
wrapped in their own look and feels. The Insurance Industry would be a
good example of this. I'm not advocating this, I'm simply saying it was
something that I have noted as being a requirement and if we still want
to support this notion it would need to happen sooner than later given
the impact it would have on the data model.
>I know one requested thing not currently supported in 1.3.x is to use
>a single GL installation to run multiple sites with independent
>databases (different physical databases or different table prefixes).
>I can see how this would make an admins life much easier when
>upgrading GL or installing plugins (which could be installed on all
>the sites, but enabled per site)...
I agree with you on this. Definitely worth it.
>I think this could be best accomplished by a Web Application plugin
>that would allow "items" to be cross submitted to several sites. Such
>a system wouldn't even depend on the sites being on the same server.
>While implementing this may be a little difficult, as there are many
>complexities involved, I think implementing this later rather than
>sooner would be OK. Such a plugin could eventually give the ability
>to submit items (and do other tasks?) through interfaces besides the
Blah, maybe we just web service this stuff that way we don't care
More information about the geeklog-devel