[geeklog-devel] PLG_commentPreSave

[Tony Bibbs]

Right, Vinny's question is why couldn't the spamx plugin just have used 
PLG_commentPreSave then?

--Tony

Vincent Furia wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:00:27 -0500, Blaine Lang <geeklog at langfamily.ca> wrote:
>  
>
>>Dirk, Tom and I talked about this when implementing the new SPAMX API's and
>>decided that it was best to still have a Non-Spamx API to allow other
>>plugins to add any other comment related filtering or handling that may be
>>required.
>>
>>    
>>
>I'm still confused as to why different APIs are needed since they
>appear to do the same thing.  They are even called one after the
>other.
>
>I think one plugin call would be enough, something like:
>
>PLG_commentPreSave(title, comment, ...) and have it return HTML to
>output if there is an error (this can include a COM_refresh) otherwise
>just return 0.  If I can work it into the plugin API to pass the
>comment and title by reference, plugins could modify those and still
>return a "success" status.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>-Vinny
>_______________________________________________
>geeklog-devel mailing list
>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>  
>