[geeklog-devel] GPLv3

[Tony Bibbs]

Timely for me in that none of the current GL2 code has a license reference at all.  I'd be interested in collecting feedback from you all as to which license makes sense for GL2 given I still have access to all the current authors (though I haven't personally talked to Vinny for a while I assume he's around) so getting buy-in should be feasible.

--Tony

----- Original Message ----
From: Blaine Lang <devel at portalparts.com>
To: Geeklog Development <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 1:45:31 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] GPLv3

Dirk,

The discussions on the Joomla site using the link you provided 
previously and frontpage story which includes a good FAQ are a great 
reference
http://www.joomla.org/content/view/3510/1/.

The interpretation is the same as we have discussed in the past.

Regards,
Blaine

Dirk Haun wrote:

> Joe Mucchiello wrote:

>

>   

>> Of course, the real problem area is the javascript parts of Geeklog. 

>> Once a user agent downloads the javascript, the website has partially 

>> distributed a GPL'd program to someone and that person now has the 

>> right to ask for all the GPL'd source code that is part of that 

>> distribution. That includes any customizations made by the website admin.

>>     

>

> I very much doubt that interpretation. If that were the case, it would

> pretty much close the loophole Christian mentioned.

>

> JavaScript, by its very nature, has to run on the client's side

> (ignoring things like JSP for the moment). I don't think this technical

> necessity counts as "distribution". 

>

> bye, Dirk

>

>

>   

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel