tony at tonybibbs.com
Mon Jul 2 09:37:49 EDT 2007
Timely for me in that none of the current GL2 code has a license reference at all. I'd be interested in collecting feedback from you all as to which license makes sense for GL2 given I still have access to all the current authors (though I haven't personally talked to Vinny for a while I assume he's around) so getting buy-in should be feasible.
----- Original Message ----
From: Blaine Lang <devel at portalparts.com>
To: Geeklog Development <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 1:45:31 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] GPLv3
The discussions on the Joomla site using the link you provided
previously and frontpage story which includes a good FAQ are a great
The interpretation is the same as we have discussed in the past.
Dirk Haun wrote:
> Joe Mucchiello wrote:
>> distributed a GPL'd program to someone and that person now has the
>> right to ask for all the GPL'd source code that is part of that
>> distribution. That includes any customizations made by the website admin.
> I very much doubt that interpretation. If that were the case, it would
> pretty much close the loophole Christian mentioned.
> (ignoring things like JSP for the moment). I don't think this technical
> necessity counts as "distribution".
> bye, Dirk
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
More information about the geeklog-devel