[geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] Geeklog-1.x
Web Site Master
WebSiteMaster at cogeco.net
Sun Nov 25 16:56:59 EST 2007
> It may be slow but so what
I would think speed would be a good thing. Geeklog.net runs a little slow
(which doesn't look good for new people visiting the site) and I am sure the
template cache system would help out a bit there.
The if clause is also a big plus.
It's not like people are lining up with new features they want to implement
at the last second. The template cache system has been known about for a
while and has been thoroughly tested. I rather wait a few weeks for 1.5.0
with the cache than hold out for 1.5.1
Just my 2 cents...
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
Sent: November-25-07 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] Geeklog-1.x
Mark R. Evans wrote:
>The final area where Geeklog needs improvement is the template engine.
It's perfectly possible that I'm missing something but what exactly is
the problem with our template engine? It may be slow but so what - it
has been slow ever since Geeklog existed in its current form. For me, a
faster / better / whatever template engine is a "nice to have" feature
that ranks pretty low on my list. I really don't get all the emotion
that seems to be involved here.
>As I sit on the sidelines and watch all this unfold, it basically pisses me
>off that Joe goes to all this effort, I champion it and provide
>benchmarking, testing and validation and it is completely ignored, over and
>over. After 3 months of begging on this list for at least a response, we
>get 'Better luck next time' with a reference to a freeze that was selective
Phrasing it as "Better luck next time" was basically _me_ being pissed
off about how things were (or rather weren't) going since the end of the
SoC. It certainly wasn't aimed at you or your efforts. Sorry if you took
it that way.
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
__________ NOD32 2684 (20071125) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
More information about the geeklog-devel