[geeklog-devel] GSOC 2010 application for Improvement in Configurations GUI
Joe Mucchiello
joe at ThrowingDice.com
Sun Mar 28 13:37:36 EDT 2010
At 12:59 PM 3/28/2010, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
>I understand your concern. Thats why I suggested there should be a different
>table for configuration permissions. All the configurations will be grouped
>into certain groups and those groups will also have permissions as a whole.
>For mapping configuration to groups, this can be done in the existing
>conf_values table itself without having to add any new rows. Only a new
>column is required to be added in the conf_values to take care of which
>configuration belongs to which groups
But there is already a features system attached to user groups.
Adding a separate configuration feature system doesn't make sense.
The config system really, really does not need to be that fine
grained in terms of permissions. No one outside of root is really
going to rename the site so why add the capability?
----
Joe Mucchiello
Throwing Dice Games
http://www.throwingdice.com
No virus found in this outgoing message
Checked by PC Tools AntiVirus (6.0.0.19 - 10.004.170).
http://www.pctools.com/free-antivirus/
More information about the geeklog-devel
mailing list