[geeklog-devel] Geeklog Professional CSS theme

[Vincent Furia]

I'd modify (or add to that question): What percent of screens are under
960px wide and are not mobile devices.

I expect all of the "6. 320x480      5.16%" screens are mobile devices.

Which brings up the question: with that many mobile users should we put some
work into creating a mobile theme that turns on by auto-detection of device
type (or screen resolution?)?

-Vinny

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:31, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:

> Tom,
>
> Do you get the total % for screens under 960px?
>
> Ben
>
>
> 2011/1/23 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
> > Hey All,
> >
> > Soon I will be adding a new theme to the repository that will hopefully
> > replace our current default theme for version 1.8.0 after some
> work/tweaks
> > has been done on it. It will be in a directory called professional_css.
> The
> > themes authors are Fumito Arakawa & Ivy (from Geeklog.jp) and is
> available
> > for download on Geeklog.net (look for ProfessionalCSS_en). To start, I
> would
> > like to thank them for all of the work they have put into the theme.
> >
> > Besides eliminating table tags this theme does a number of things
> > differently. So if you are interested, I would suggest at least
> downloading
> > the theme and take a look at the readme file for more information. If
> people
> > disagree on how certain things are done in the theme I would like to hear
> > about it now before more work gets put into this.
> >
> > Before I add the theme to the repository, I will be updating the theme to
> > support the new template changes we have currently in 1.8.0 along with
> > adding the new images Rouslan did for us. Once the new theme gets added
> into
> > the repository if anyone does any theme changes, like adding new template
> > variables or theme files, please make sure to also add them to the new
> > theme.
> >
> > I do not expect this new theme to look exactly the same as our current
> > default theme. It will look similar but if some things are changed around
> > for the better, then I am all for it. The one thing I do not plan on
> > changing is the color scheme. Rouslan has already put a lot of work into
> the
> > new logo and icons for the site. We can save the major theme design
> changes
> > and page designs like this for when we start the new site redesign at a
> > later date.
> >
> > Once I have the new theme in the repository, people are more than welcome
> to
> > help out. Let's just communicate through email or on the mailing list
> just
> > to makes sure we know what we are all working on.
> >
> > The first thing I will be doing is working on the general layout which
> > actually brings me to my first question.
> >
> > The new theme is currently has a fixed width of 960 pixels. I would
> actually
> > like to keep the width fixed as I think it looks much better on the
> larger
> > monitors most people use these days. It also makes designing new pages
> > easier.
> >
> > To help in the decision I took a look at Google Analytics for a site that
> > gets a large number of North American visitors. Here are the top ten
> screen
> > resolutions:
> >
> > 1. 1280x800     19.60%
> > 2. 1024x768     15.41%
> > 3. 1366x768     11.45%
> > 4. 1440x900     7.73%
> > 5. 1280x1024    5.77%
> > 6. 320x480      5.16%
> > 7. 1680x1050    4.35%
> > 8. 1920x1080    3.10%
> > 9. 1600x900     2.56%
> > 10. 1920x1200   2.03%
> >
> > For those of you who are interested, here is some info on what browsers
> are
> > being used:
> >
> > 1. Internet Explorer             40.01%
> > 2. Firefox                      26.77%
> > 3. Safari                       17.87%
> > 4. Chrome                       11.69%
> > 5. Opera                        1.06%
> > 6. Mozilla Compatible Agent     0.79%
> > 7. Opera Mini                   0.76%
> > 8. BlackBerry8530               0.15%
> > 9. BlackBerry9700               0.13%
> > 10. Mozilla                     0.11%
> >
> > And since Java Support is an issue for some of the Admin configuration:
> >
> > 1. Yes          78.75%
> > 2. No   21.25%
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geeklog-devel mailing list
> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20110124/7d568458/attachment.html>