[geeklog-devel] Geeklog Professional CSS theme

[Tom]

Ø  Which brings up the question: with that many mobile users should we put
some work into creating a mobile theme that turns on by auto-detection of
device type (or screen resolution?)?

 

I had thought of that and was planning to look at Geeklog.jp solution to it
at some point (which is based on Professional_CSS theme) 

 

http://www.geeklog.net/filemgmt/index.php/1024

 

Tom

 

From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent Furia
Sent: January-24-11 10:54 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Professional CSS theme

 

I'd modify (or add to that question): What percent of screens are under
960px wide and are not mobile devices.

I expect all of the "6. 320x480      5.16%" screens are mobile devices. 

Which brings up the question: with that many mobile users should we put some
work into creating a mobile theme that turns on by auto-detection of device
type (or screen resolution?)?

-Vinny

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:31, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:

Tom,

Do you get the total % for screens under 960px?

Ben


2011/1/23 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:

> Hey All,
>
> Soon I will be adding a new theme to the repository that will hopefully
> replace our current default theme for version 1.8.0 after some work/tweaks
> has been done on it. It will be in a directory called professional_css.
The
> themes authors are Fumito Arakawa & Ivy (from Geeklog.jp) and is available
> for download on Geeklog.net (look for ProfessionalCSS_en). To start, I
would
> like to thank them for all of the work they have put into the theme.
>
> Besides eliminating table tags this theme does a number of things
> differently. So if you are interested, I would suggest at least
downloading
> the theme and take a look at the readme file for more information. If
people
> disagree on how certain things are done in the theme I would like to hear
> about it now before more work gets put into this.
>
> Before I add the theme to the repository, I will be updating the theme to
> support the new template changes we have currently in 1.8.0 along with
> adding the new images Rouslan did for us. Once the new theme gets added
into
> the repository if anyone does any theme changes, like adding new template
> variables or theme files, please make sure to also add them to the new
> theme.
>
> I do not expect this new theme to look exactly the same as our current
> default theme. It will look similar but if some things are changed around
> for the better, then I am all for it. The one thing I do not plan on
> changing is the color scheme. Rouslan has already put a lot of work into
the
> new logo and icons for the site. We can save the major theme design
changes
> and page designs like this for when we start the new site redesign at a
> later date.
>
> Once I have the new theme in the repository, people are more than welcome
to
> help out. Let's just communicate through email or on the mailing list just
> to makes sure we know what we are all working on.
>
> The first thing I will be doing is working on the general layout which
> actually brings me to my first question.
>
> The new theme is currently has a fixed width of 960 pixels. I would
actually
> like to keep the width fixed as I think it looks much better on the larger
> monitors most people use these days. It also makes designing new pages
> easier.
>
> To help in the decision I took a look at Google Analytics for a site that
> gets a large number of North American visitors. Here are the top ten
screen
> resolutions:
>
> 1. 1280x800     19.60%
> 2. 1024x768     15.41%
> 3. 1366x768     11.45%
> 4. 1440x900     7.73%
> 5. 1280x1024    5.77%
> 6. 320x480      5.16%
> 7. 1680x1050    4.35%
> 8. 1920x1080    3.10%
> 9. 1600x900     2.56%
> 10. 1920x1200   2.03%
>
> For those of you who are interested, here is some info on what browsers
are
> being used:
>
> 1. Internet Explorer             40.01%
> 2. Firefox                      26.77%
> 3. Safari                       17.87%
> 4. Chrome                       11.69%
> 5. Opera                        1.06%
> 6. Mozilla Compatible Agent     0.79%
> 7. Opera Mini                   0.76%
> 8. BlackBerry8530               0.15%
> 9. BlackBerry9700               0.13%
> 10. Mozilla                     0.11%
>
> And since Java Support is an issue for some of the Admin configuration:
>
> 1. Yes          78.75%
> 2. No   21.25%
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20110124/c58b69f3/attachment.html>