[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update

[Trinity]

What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since it
breaks compatibility with old plugins and having plug-in devs have pre and
post 2,0 plug-ins? I know you had at one time the Geeklog 2.0 thing but he
has since called it something else other than geeklog.

I know im not involved much anymore but i still keep tabs on geeklog dev.

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:


> I have a feeling that the 1.9.0 release will cause a lot of breakage,

> especially with plugins. I've been running into all sorts of small issues

> all morning …

>

> For example, the Forum plugin fails to install due to the use of the 'tid'

> field when adding a block. The MySQLi class is more picky about things than

> the old MySQL class, which also seems to affect some plugins (including the

> Polls plugin, which did call mysql_real_escape_string() directly in the

> plugin upgrade code somewhere).

>

> So we really need to get the plugin authors on board for this one.

>

> We also need to make it really clear this time that there may be issues

> when trying out early versions - including the risk of the site no longer

> working due to plugin incompatibilities.

>

> Any thoughts on how to best approach this?

>

> bye, Dirk

>

>

> --

> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/

>

> _______________________________________________

> geeklog-devel mailing list

> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://eight.pairlist.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120304/01b87ca3/attachment-0001.htm>