[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[cordiste]

About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon
the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to
integrate into a theme.

Ben

P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme
http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583

2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>
> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure about the
> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally would
> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes in
> the install for now).
>
> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the new
> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his progress by
> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.
>
> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name the
> new theme?
>
>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>
> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally do
> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic work
> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics for
> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet and
> look of the current logo.
>
> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?
>
> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>
> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>
> Ben
>
> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
>>
>> - Dan Stoner
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>>> So what is the verdict here?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
>>>
>>> -          A new Theme is being included
>>>
>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent
>>> Furia
>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
>>> To: Geeklog Development
>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"
>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that
>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be
>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"
>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't
> think the confusion would be that great.
>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic id.
>>>
>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to
>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last
>>> active AptitudeCMS development...
>>>
>>> -Vinny
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Trinity wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since
>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins
>>>
>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up
>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear
>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much
>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans
>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the place
>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling
>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> bye, Dirk
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>