[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[cordiste]

Anyway, Rouslan and Yoshinori you have made very nice design.

Ben

2012/3/14 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:
> About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon
> the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to
> integrate into a theme.
>
> Ben
>
> P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme
> http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583
>
> 2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>>
>> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure about the
>> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally would
>> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes in
>> the install for now).
>>
>> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the new
>> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his progress by
>> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.
>>
>> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name the
>> new theme?
>>
>>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>>
>> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally do
>> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic work
>> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics for
>> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet and
>> look of the current logo.
>>
>> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
>> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM
>> To: Geeklog Development
>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?
>>
>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>>
>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
>>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
>>>
>>> - Dan Stoner
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
>>>> So what is the verdict here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
>>>>
>>>> -          A new Theme is being included
>>>>
>>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent
>>>> Furia
>>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
>>>> To: Geeklog Development
>>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"
>>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that
>>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be
>>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"
>>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't
>> think the confusion would be that great.
>>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic id.
>>>>
>>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to
>>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last
>>>> active AptitudeCMS development...
>>>>
>>>> -Vinny
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Trinity wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since
>>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins
>>>>
>>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up
>>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear
>>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much
>>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans
>>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the place
>>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling
>>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bye, Dirk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>