[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[Trinity]

Perhaps the yahoo YUI2 Grids *CSS* style sheets could be useful for doing a
pure css multi column layout

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:


> Anyway, Rouslan and Yoshinori you have made very nice design.

>

> Ben

>

> 2012/3/14 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:

> > About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon

> > the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to

> > integrate into a theme.

> >

> > Ben

> >

> > P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme

> > http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583

> >

> > 2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:

> >>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?

> >>

> >> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure

> about the

> >> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally

> would

> >> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes

> in

> >> the install for now).

> >>

> >> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the

> new

> >> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his

> progress by

> >> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.

> >>

> >> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name

> the

> >> new theme?

> >>

> >>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?

> >>

> >> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally

> do

> >> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic

> work

> >> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics

> for

> >> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet

> and

> >> look of the current logo.

> >>

> >> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.

> >>

> >> Tom

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> -----Original Message-----

> >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net

> >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste

> >> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM

> >> To: Geeklog Development

> >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

> >>

> >> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?

> >>

> >> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?

> >>

> >> Ben

> >>

> >> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:

> >>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.

> >>>

> >>> - Dan Stoner

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> >>>> So what is the verdict here?

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins

> >>>>

> >>>> -          A new Theme is being included

> >>>>

> >>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> Tom

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net

> >>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent

> >>>> Furia

> >>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM

> >>>> To: Geeklog Development

> >>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"

> >>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that

> >>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be

> >>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"

> >>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't

> >> think the confusion would be that great.

> >>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic

> id.

> >>>>

> >>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to

> >>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last

> >>>> active AptitudeCMS development...

> >>>>

> >>>> -Vinny

> >>>>

> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:

> >>>>

> >>>> Trinity wrote:

> >>>>

> >>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since

> >>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins

> >>>>

> >>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up

> >>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear

> >>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much

> >>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans

> >>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the place

> >>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling

> >>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch

> >>>> ;-)

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> bye, Dirk

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> --

> >>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/

> >>>>

> >>>> _______________________________________________

> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list

> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> _______________________________________________

> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list

> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

> >>>>

> >>> _______________________________________________

> >>> geeklog-devel mailing list

> >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

> >>>

> >> _______________________________________________

> >> geeklog-devel mailing list

> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

> >>

> >> _______________________________________________

> >> geeklog-devel mailing list

> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

> >>

> _______________________________________________

> geeklog-devel mailing list

> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net

> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://eight.pairlist.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120314/6a1e4cdb/attachment-0001.htm>