[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

Thu Mar 15 05:55:35 EDT 2012

Hi, all

Yoshinori's responsive and non table layout theme is so nice, I think.

Table layout is not so beautiful on iPhone, iPad, Android and some
size of browser.
Javascript problem is a small problem, but table layout problem is serious.

We can make many style theme by css style theme.
But table layout theme is hard to make variation.
So please back to css layout and avoid table layout html from program source.

Tom,

> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:

I think so too.

--
Ivy
http://www.geeklog.jp

http://test.trybase.com/test181j/

2012/3/15 Vincent Furia <vfuria at gmail.com>:
> I don't see anything in YUI2 Grids that can support a dynamic number of
> columns (without JavaScript). Is there a particular feature or instructions
> you can point to?
>
> -Vinny
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 17:42, Trinity <trinity93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps the yahoo YUI2 Grids CSS style sheets could be useful for doing a
>> pure css multi column layout
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway, Rouslan and Yoshinori you have made very nice design.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> 2012/3/14 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:
>>> > About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon
>>> > the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to
>>> > integrate into a theme.
>>> >
>>> > Ben
>>> >
>>> > P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme
>>> > http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583
>>> >
>>> > 2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>>> >>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>>> >>
>>> >> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure
>>> >> about the
>>> >> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally
>>> >> would
>>> >> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes
>>> >> in
>>> >> the install for now).
>>> >>
>>> >> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the
>>> >> new
>>> >> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his
>>> >> progress by
>>> >> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.
>>> >>
>>> >> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name
>>> >> the
>>> >> new theme?
>>> >>
>>> >>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>>> >>
>>> >> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally
>>> >> do
>>> >> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic
>>> >> work
>>> >> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics
>>> >> for
>>> >> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet
>>> >> and
>>> >> look of the current logo.
>>> >>
>>> >> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.
>>> >>
>>> >> Tom
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
>>> >> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM
>>> >> To: Geeklog Development
>>> >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?
>>> >>
>>> >> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>>> >>
>>> >> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>>> >>
>>> >> Ben
>>> >>
>>> >> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
>>> >>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Dan Stoner
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>> So what is the verdict here?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -          A new Theme is being included
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Tom
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of
>>> >>>> Vincent
>>> >>>> Furia
>>> >>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
>>> >>>> To: Geeklog Development
>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"
>>> >>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that
>>> >>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be
>>> >>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"
>>> >>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't
>>> >> think the confusion would be that great.
>>> >>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic
>>> >>>> id.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have
>>> >>>> to
>>> >>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last
>>> >>>> active AptitudeCMS development...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -Vinny
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Trinity wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version
>>> >>>>> since
>>> >>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up
>>> >>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear
>>> >>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much
>>> >>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans
>>> >>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the
>>> >>>> place
>>> >>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling
>>> >>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
>>> >>>> ;-)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> bye, Dirk
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> >>>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>> >>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>