[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[Vincent Furia]

I don't see anything in YUI2 Grids that can support a dynamic number of
columns (without JavaScript). Is there a particular feature or instructions
you can point to?

-Vinny

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 17:42, Trinity <trinity93 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps the yahoo YUI2 Grids *CSS* style sheets could be useful for doing
> a pure css multi column layout
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, Rouslan and Yoshinori you have made very nice design.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> 2012/3/14 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:
>> > About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon
>> > the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to
>> > integrate into a theme.
>> >
>> > Ben
>> >
>> > P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme
>> > http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583
>> >
>> > 2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>> >>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>> >>
>> >> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure
>> about the
>> >> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally
>> would
>> >> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes
>> in
>> >> the install for now).
>> >>
>> >> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the
>> new
>> >> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his
>> progress by
>> >> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.
>> >>
>> >> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name
>> the
>> >> new theme?
>> >>
>> >>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>> >>
>> >> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally
>> do
>> >> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic
>> work
>> >> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics
>> for
>> >> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet
>> and
>> >> look of the current logo.
>> >>
>> >> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.
>> >>
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
>> >> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM
>> >> To: Geeklog Development
>> >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?
>> >>
>> >> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
>> >>
>> >> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
>> >>
>> >> Ben
>> >>
>> >> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
>> >>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
>> >>>
>> >>> - Dan Stoner
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> So what is the verdict here?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -          A new Theme is being included
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Tom
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
>> >>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of
>> Vincent
>> >>>> Furia
>> >>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
>> >>>> To: Geeklog Development
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"
>> >>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that
>> >>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be
>> >>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"
>> >>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't
>> >> think the confusion would be that great.
>> >>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic
>> id.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to
>> >>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last
>> >>>> active AptitudeCMS development...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Vinny
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Trinity wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since
>> >>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up
>> >>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear
>> >>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much
>> >>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans
>> >>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the place
>> >>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling
>> >>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
>> >>>> ;-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> bye, Dirk
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> >>>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geeklog-devel mailing list
>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120314/7b404107/attachment.html>