[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0 Schedule

[Vincent Furia]

I think the real fix for these problems is to replace/upgrade the the
template engine. The obvious "easy" fix, being to not build the COM_header
template until the end of processing, would require a huge number of code
changes across almost every single file in public_html. Then comes the
problem of enforcing that change in the plugins...

Whichever way we go it's going to be a huge amount of work and we're going
to slip our release significantly. I think we ship 2.0 as is, and work on a
comprehensive solution for 2.1.

-Vinny

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 13:29, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Yeah same here. One of the problems with these 2 issues is how far do we
> want to go?
>
> Do we design something completely new and more elegant (as stated in some
> of
> the feedback on the issues) which would take time or do we go for a simpler
> solution to solve the issue while keeping compatibility with older plugins
> (but not necessarily strict compliance).
>
> If we did decide to do something I would be probably for the second option
> especially if it has a remote chance to be in 2.0.0 (feature creep here we
> come :-)
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Rouslan
> Placella
> Sent: March-26-12 10:04 AM
> To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0 Schedule
>
> Quoting Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
>
> > A quick update in regards to the Geeklog 2.0 release. We are
> > approaching the end of March and still have things to work on. I know
> > everyone is pretty busy so let's bump the RC to mid-end of April.
> >
> > Rouslan has been working on the new theme and it has been coming along
> > nicely. For those of you who haven't seen it yet it is available in
> > the repository and is currently called newpro.
> >
> > Here are the list of items (besides the theme) I think we should
> > finish before we release Geeklog 2.0.0 RC 1:
> >
> > Name the new Theme - Ideas?
> >
> > Changing "Remember Me For" does not update cookie timeout
> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1335
> >
> > Update Page Navigation with link elements
> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1391
> >
> > The part of the page navigator should do markup by a list.
> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1422
> >
> > Failure when trying to report sitemap.xml write error (I am not sure
> > if this happens on a Windows system since I have not seen it before)
> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1412
> >
> > If anyone has and additions or comments let us know.
>
> I think that this bug[0] needs to be fixed for 2.0.0 I keep stumbling into
> it while working on the theme and can never find a proper workaround for
> this. Others have had their issues with it as well[1]. One example is the
> CSS layout and another one are the breadcrumbs, which should be generated
> in
> the header, but we don't know if there will be any when generating the
> header. Then they may be created in a few different places on the page
> since
> they are rendered with the articale (or static page, or whatever), but they
> really must be fixed in a particular position to be effective.
>
> Bye,
> Rouslan
>
> [0]: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1358
> [1]: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1316
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120328/fe48f199/attachment.html>