[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs

[Trinity]

use cron

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> Okay,
>
> I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication is
> taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on
> Geeklog.net.
>
> On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and 1
> forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the processing
> time.
>
> Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated every
> single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php
>
> The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the
> future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to rebuild
> the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published.
>
> This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are updated.
>
> I have a few ideas on how to improve this ...  but I would like to hear
> some
> other suggestions!
>
> Tom
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs
>
> I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous
> users and topics not being tracked properly.
>
> Tom
>
> Note: This does not fix bug 1486
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs
>
> One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked
> properly
> for some reason.
>
> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for
> Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users)
>
> This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to
> be
> getting lost:
>
> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is
> lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin)
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1
>
> Hi All,
>
> I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to
> the RC1.
>
> It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small
> hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin
> updates.
>
> I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve
> theme.
>
> The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the
> Redesign wiki document.
>
> Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to
> concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit.
> This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements
> are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in
> multiple topics.
>
> Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old
> site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I
> recall from before this was usually under a second)
>
> After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds
> (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds
> for some reason.
>
> Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new
> indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-)
>
> Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this
> mailing list so we can get it fixed.
>
> I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with
> Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also
> notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site
> seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a
> bit of optimizing as well.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20121004/ed282742/attachment.html>