[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs

[cordiste]

Tom,

How did you track the execution time?

A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more
updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date is
between now and this last run on pages where this article is display.
If yes then we update the feed.

Ben

2012/10/4 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
> Okay,
>
> I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication is
> taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on
> Geeklog.net.
>
> On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and 1
> forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the processing
> time.
>
> Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated every
> single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php
>
> The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the
> future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to rebuild
> the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published.
>
> This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are updated.
>
> I have a few ideas on how to improve this ...  but I would like to hear some
> other suggestions!
>
> Tom
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs
>
> I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous
> users and topics not being tracked properly.
>
> Tom
>
> Note: This does not fix bug 1486
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs
>
> One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked properly
> for some reason.
>
> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for
> Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users)
>
> This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to be
> getting lost:
>
> http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is
> lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin)
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1
>
> Hi All,
>
> I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to
> the RC1.
>
> It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small
> hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin
> updates.
>
> I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve
> theme.
>
> The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the
> Redesign wiki document.
>
> Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to
> concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit.
> This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements
> are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in
> multiple topics.
>
> Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old
> site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I
> recall from before this was usually under a second)
>
> After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds
> (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds
> for some reason.
>
> Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new
> indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-)
>
> Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this
> mailing list so we can get it fixed.
>
> I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with
> Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also
> notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site
> seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a
> bit of optimizing as well.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>