[geeklog-devel] Registering My Favorite WYSIWYG HTML Editor

[Tom]

I haven't tried that one before.

Currently Geeklog 2.1.0 has the FCK and the CK editor bundled with it.
Dengen also made it much easier to add additional editors which is now
selectable in the Geeklog Config.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
Sent: October-07-13 10:22 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Registering My Favorite WYSIWYG HTML Editor

Did someone ever try xhEditor [1] ?

xhEditor is a simple,small,fast WYSWYG(What You See What You Get) XHTML
editor based on jQuery and compatible with Internet Explorer 6.0+,Firefox
3.0+,Opera 9.6+,Chrome 1.0+,Safari 3.22+

Ben

[1] http://xheditor.com/demo


2013/8/17 Yoshinori Tahara <taharaxp at gmail.com>:
> Tom wrote:
>> I like solution 2 better as well. This way Geeklog has full control 
>> of the editor selected and you can have more than one editor 
>> installed. Doing it the other way may create problems if you have 2 
>> plugins installed that each have a different editor.
>
> Thanks for your agreement.
> But I think even in the case of Solution 1, to be able to manage more 
> than one editor without problems.
>
>
> Tom wrote:
>> My one question is do we want the user to be able to select their own 
>> advance editor if more than one is installed? I personally would say 
>> no. I would want them to only use the one I have selected for the site.
>
> I agree with your opinion.
> However, we should allow the user to be able to select their own 
> editor like that the user can select their own theme.
> It is up to the site administrator to give the right of choice to the
user.
>
> Tom wrote:
>> The only other downside to me is that plugins are easy to install 
>> since you can do it from the Geeklog plugin interface. At some point 
>> in the future we should try to add an interface so webmasters can 
>> install themes and editors directly from the Geeklog Admin.
>
> I agree with your opinion.
>
>
>
> Wim wrote:
>> Agree with Tom, with one exception.
>>
>> I agree that is not up to the user to select a specific editor. But 
>> it is up the role the user is playing.
>> Comment posting could do entirely with the most basic editor available.
>> See what I mean at LinkedIn: they are using a fine feature for 
>> posting comments; no decorations, only user experience.
>> Than I guess a story admin, aka CMS user, would like to use the most 
>> advanced editor available for drafting new stories.
>
> I appreciate your opinion.
> I also think I want to enable the selection of the feature of the 
> editor for the posting comments.
>
>
> --
> Yoshinori Tahara - dengen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel