[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.2.0 - What do we want?

[Tom]

Since the conversation started in the forum (and the thread is a few pages
long) any replies specifically about the glpage class I think should be kept
in the forum.

Thanks

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: geeklog-devel [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On
Behalf Of Wim Niemans
Sent: September-10-14 9:23 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.2.0 - What do we want?


Besides Tom and Ben, no developers are seen at the forum to disclose their
opinions. Either there is no interest, either everybody is quite happy with
current GL rendering functions.
Maybe the forum is not the right place to discuss, maybe the abstraction
level is not good.
Maybe other reasons?

https://www.geeklog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=95800
http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Wireframes
http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/GlPage

Background of the effort: I've developed a plugin (still in the works)
inspired by the forms plugin and databox by Ivy. My experiment uses graph
notations for database access and 'paints' in a canvas object using a faces
concept (similar to glPage). This works quite well, bug free and loads fast.
The plugin contains more OO-classes that could be of interest: exceptions,
(db)lexicon, maps, validators. For now I am working to deliver glPage and
associates with 100% compatibility. It would be very sour if it turns out
that it will not make it into the core.

Wim


On 31 Aug 2014, at 17:50, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:

> For those interested on a discussion on the new page class please 
> check out the Geeklog Forum
> 
> https://www.geeklog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=95800
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] 
> On Behalf Of Tom
> Sent: August-23-14 10:50 AM
> To: 'Geeklog Development'
> Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.2.0 - What do we want?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Here is a list of items that I see as important and I would like to 
> see tackled in the next version of Geeklog. This doesn't mean that 
> everything is going to make it but I want to reach out to the community to
get your ideas.
> 
> For those of you interested in possibly helping out let us know which
> item(s) you are hoping to work on. Also if you have any features you 
> would like to possibly add to Geeklog let us know.
> 
> The things I plan on tackling first would be the OAuth stuff and the 
> Page Class.
> 
> 1. Update OAuth Library
> 	- Add page to wiki showing how to make it easier for other
developers
> 	- We should this for other outside libraries we use (file manager, 
> jquery, editors, etc...) 2. Remove MSSQL and/or PGSQL Support 3. 
> Update CK Editor 3. Fix Bugs
> 	- Fix not support browser for CK Editor (#0001753)
> 	- etc...
> 4. Update Geeklog.net 
> 	- Use Downloads Plugin
> 	- Developers Page
> 5. XMLSitemap Plugin - Add dedicated API (#0001757) 6. Create Page 
> Class (combining it with COM_createHTMLDocument)
> 	- Add Pagination with rel="next" and rel="prev"
> 	- Depreciate COM_siteHeader, COM_siteFooter
> 	- COM_createHTMLDocument would still be available for backwards 
> compatiblity 7. OAuth Users to the submission queue (#0001736) 8. 
> Multiple Topics in Search (#0001670) 9. Drop support for LDAP and Live 
> Journal authentication. OpenID?
> 10. Demo Site option (#1059)
> 11. HTML 5 theme
> 
> 12. Integrate GSOC Calendar project (Ben??) 13. Plugin Repository GSOC 
> project
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel