[geeklog-users] www.geeklog.net not valid html 4.01

wOOge wooge at axonz.com
Sun Mar 14 19:16:33 EST 2004


In my theme, i did the best i could to produce 4.01 compliant code, but
like Dirk said, it's hard to moderate the quality of 3rd party code,
and posters.

-wOOge


On Mar 14, 2004, at 6:16 PM, Dirk Haun wrote:


>> This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!

>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.geeklog.net

>>

>> isn't this bad?

>

> It's not exactly bad, but certainly could be better.

>

> It's not too hard to create a valid Geeklog site[1], but it does

> require

> some discipline when posting and you can't assume that all of your

> users

> will produce valid HTML in their stories / comments.

>

> Also, some of the plugins don't exactly produce valid HTML either (for

> example, many of the errors on geeklog.net seem to be caused by the

> forum

> block).

>

> bye, Dirk

>

> [1] try

> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.macosx-faq.de>

>

>

> --

> http://www.haun-online.de/

> http://www.tinyweb.de/

>

> _______________________________________________

> geeklog-users mailing list

> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net

> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users

>





More information about the geeklog-users mailing list