[geeklog-users] www.geeklog.net not valid html 4.01
wOOge
wooge at axonz.com
Sun Mar 14 19:16:33 EST 2004
In my theme, i did the best i could to produce 4.01 compliant code, but
like Dirk said, it's hard to moderate the quality of 3rd party code,
and posters.
-wOOge
On Mar 14, 2004, at 6:16 PM, Dirk Haun wrote:
>> This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.geeklog.net
>>
>> isn't this bad?
>
> It's not exactly bad, but certainly could be better.
>
> It's not too hard to create a valid Geeklog site[1], but it does
> require
> some discipline when posting and you can't assume that all of your
> users
> will produce valid HTML in their stories / comments.
>
> Also, some of the plugins don't exactly produce valid HTML either (for
> example, many of the errors on geeklog.net seem to be caused by the
> forum
> block).
>
> bye, Dirk
>
> [1] try
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.macosx-faq.de>
>
>
> --
> http://www.haun-online.de/
> http://www.tinyweb.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-users mailing list
> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users
>
More information about the geeklog-users
mailing list