[geeklog-users] geeklog performance
Doc Radium
docradium at gmail.com
Tue Jan 4 10:52:02 EST 2005
Have you tried disabling the BBC rdf feed and the gallery random photo block
and compared page generation times?
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:08:39 -0600, Tony Bibbs <tony at tonybibbs.com> wrote:
> The network connection has a measurable impact, however, the page
> creation times have nothing to do with networking. So while you point
> out a good issue, the script execution is still an issue.
>
> --Tony
>
> MAC OS X at Rocteur.CC wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've looked at your site a couple of times over the last couple of
> > days and from what I can see, your link is just slow, I don't think
> > you'll speed it up a lot by changing anything related to PHP, MySQL or
> > even Geeklog! Your network connection is slow.
> >
> > From Belgium:
> >
> > traceroute to robinbowes.com (81.98.79.17), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> > 1 server.rocteur.cc (192.168.1.3) 13.393 ms 0.712 ms 0.624 ms
> > 2 d5766601.kabel.telenet.be (213.118.102.1) 24.805 ms 25.921 ms
> > 9.072 ms
> > 3 d5e0fae1.kabel.telenet.be (213.224.250.225) 52.331 ms 16.031 ms
> > 24.752 ms
> > 4 213.224.126.170 (213.224.126.170) 20.518 ms 14.392 ms 5.822 ms
> > 5 212.3.238.5 (212.3.238.5) 10.666 ms 26.303 ms 7.223 ms
> > 6 ae-0-16.mp2.brussels1.level3.net (212.3.239.82) 32.168 ms 75.68
> > ms 9.976 ms
> > 7 ae1-0.bbr2.london1.level3.net (212.187.128.57) 30.179 ms 28.633
> > ms 19.914 ms
> > 8 ge-3-0-0-0.gar2.london1.level3.net (4.68.128.126) 68.755 ms
> > 26.792 ms 18.897 ms
> > 9 195.50.91.70 (195.50.91.70) 10.93 ms 19.805 ms 16.446 ms
> > 10 win-bb-b-so-500-0.inet.ntl.com (62.253.185.202) 24.976 ms 18.177
> > ms 17.178 ms
> > 11 bre-bb-a-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com (62.253.185.197) 25.073 ms 63.785
> > ms 26.693 ms
> > 12 herm-t2core-a-pos31.inet.ntl.com (62.253.187.18) 20.736 ms
> > 26.754 ms 47.562 ms
> > 13 herm-t2cam1-a-ge-wan31.inet.ntl.com (80.3.33.6) 23.543 ms 50.513
> > ms 31.777 ms
> > 14 ubr02reig-ge10.inet.ntl.com (80.3.34.34) 33.135 ms 27.161 ms
> > 36.604 ms
> > 15 * * *
> > 16 * * *
> > 17 * * *
> > 18 * * *
> > 19 * * *
> > 20 * * *
> > 21 * * *
> > 22 * * *
> > 23 * * *
> > 24 * * *
> > 25 * * *
> > 26 * * *
> > 27 * * *
> > 28 * * *
> > 29 * * *
> > 30 * * *
> >
> > From Texas:
> >
> > traceroute to robinbowes.com (81.98.79.17), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
> > 1 ev1s-66-98-204-1.ev1servers.net (66.98.204.1) 0.261 ms 0.194 ms
> > 0.261 ms
> > 2 ivhou-207-218-245-14.ev1.net (207.218.245.14) 0.419 ms 0.313 ms *
> > 3 hstntx1wce2-gige5-0.wcg.net (65.77.93.53) 1.285 ms 1.189 ms
> > 0.986 ms
> > 4 hstntx1wcx3-pos9-2-oc48.wcg.net (65.77.93.214) 1.237 ms 1.206 ms *
> > 5 dllstx1wcx3-pos14-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.210.65) 6.127 ms 5.810
> > ms 5.982 ms
> > 6 dllstx9lcx1-pos9-0.wcg.net (64.200.232.210) 5.977 ms 6.077 ms *
> > 7 so-2-2-0.edge1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.127.21) 6.443 ms 6.253
> > ms 6.155 ms
> > 8 so-1-2-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net (209.244.15.165) 6.161 ms 6.271
> > ms 6.303 ms
> > 9 ae-0-0.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net (64.159.0.230) 49.233 ms
> > 48.996 ms 49.055 ms
> > 10 as-0-0.bbr1.London2.Level3.net (4.68.128.101) 116.643 ms 115.730
> > ms *
> > 11 ge-3-0-0.gar1.London2.Level3.net (4.68.124.62) 115.976 ms
> > 116.097 ms 116.667 ms
> > 12 195.50.91.130 (195.50.91.130) 117.500 ms 117.319 ms 118.413 ms
> > 13 bre-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com (213.105.172.86) 117.672 ms 117.926
> > ms 118.106 ms
> > 14 herm-t2core-a-pos31.inet.ntl.com (62.253.187.18) 117.971 ms
> > 118.069 ms 118.918 ms
> > 15 herm-t2cam1-a-ge-wan31.inet.ntl.com (80.3.33.6) 118.317 ms
> > 118.018 ms 118.113 ms
> > 16 ubr02reig-ge10.inet.ntl.com (80.3.34.34) 118.791 ms 119.000 ms
> > 119.583 ms
> > 17 * * *
> > 18 * * *
> > 19 * * *
> > 20 * * *
> >
> >
> >
> > On 31 Dec 2004, at 01:23, Robin Bowes wrote:
> >
> >> Tony Bibbs wrote:
> >>
> >>> Most of the load is, undoubtedly, on the database. Do you have
> >>> MySQL's query cache feature enabled and optimally configured? I'd
> >>> start there.
> >>
> >>
> >> Tony,
> >>
> >> I'm already using turck-mmcache but not cached queries.
> >>
> >> I turned on cached queries and didn't see any noticeable speed up. I
> >> use the following settings in my.cnf:
> >>
> >> query_cache_type=1
> >> query_cache_size=20M
> >>
> >> It's definitely turned on:
> >>
> >> mysql> show variables like '%query_cache%';
> >> +------------------------------+----------+
> >> | Variable_name | Value |
> >> +------------------------------+----------+
> >> | have_query_cache | YES |
> >> | query_cache_limit | 1048576 |
> >> | query_cache_min_res_unit | 4096 |
> >> | query_cache_size | 20971520 |
> >> | query_cache_type | ON |
> >> | query_cache_wlock_invalidate | OFF |
> >> +------------------------------+----------+
> >> 6 rows in set (0.00 sec)
> >>
> >> If I load my home page a few times I see the following cache status:
> >>
> >> mysql> show status like 'Qcache%';
> >> +-------------------------+----------+
> >> | Variable_name | Value |
> >> +-------------------------+----------+
> >> | Qcache_free_blocks | 2 |
> >> | Qcache_free_memory | 20802176 |
> >> | Qcache_hits | 495 |
> >> | Qcache_inserts | 163 |
> >> | Qcache_lowmem_prunes | 0 |
> >> | Qcache_not_cached | 44 |
> >> | Qcache_queries_in_cache | 122 |
> >> | Qcache_total_blocks | 289 |
> >> +-------------------------+----------+
> >> 8 rows in set (0.00 sec)
> >>
> >> So, I'm getting cache hits, but it doesn't seem to be making much
> >> difference.
> >>
> >> Any further suggestions?
> >>
> >> R.
> >> --
> >> http://robinbowes.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geeklog-users mailing list
> >> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net
> >> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geeklog-users mailing list
> > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net
> > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-users mailing list
> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net
> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users
>
More information about the geeklog-users
mailing list