[geeklog-devel] PLG_commentPreSave

[Blaine Lang]

Vincent Furia wrote:
>What is the difference between PLG_commentPreSave and
>PLG_checkForSpam?  Are both really needed?

Dirk, Tom and I talked about this when implementing the new SPAMX API's and 
decided that it was best to still have a Non-Spamx API to allow other 
plugins to add any other comment related filtering or handling that may be 
required.

Blaine
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Bibbs" <tony at tonybibbs.com>
To: <geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] PLG_commentPreSave


Only point I have is on semantics.  I know it's only wording so take
this feedback for what it is worth.

Seems PLG_commentPreSave make more sense in how it might be used in a
broader sense.  PLG_checkForSpam, IMHO, is too specific.  I can see how
people might dream up a need to do some processing before a comment is
saved that may be completely unrelated to spam.

--Tony

Vincent Furia wrote:

>Trying to understand the entire comment system a bit better as I
>refactor all this code...
>
>What is the difference between PLG_commentPreSave and
>PLG_checkForSpam?  Are both really needed?  Is PLG_commentPreSave even
>used (or planned to be used) in any plugins.  Can people see a need
>for it not filled by PLG_checkForSpam?
>
>Thanks,
>Vinny
>
>P.S.  I'm almost done, just need to take care of this issue and then
>work on plugin documentation.
>_______________________________________________
>geeklog-devel mailing list
>geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
>http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel