[geeklog-devel] Wiki docs
oliver at spiesshofer.com
Wed Jul 11 22:56:04 EDT 2007
I guess that spelling and grammar is a must. Work can be only handed
over as correct and finished from those two points.
If someone describes things in words well enough that screenshots are
not needed, fine, get the money. Or we rate a screenshot as 20 words?
Vincent Furia wrote:
> While its probably a bit more subjective than measuring code, I think
> the same idea can work here. We can identify the holes in the wiki,
> and then offer bounties to fill them. Like Oliver said, we can grade
> on number or words; but we should also evaluate the product based on
> correct grammar (at least understandable), spelling, sufficient screen
> shots etc.
More information about the geeklog-devel