[geeklog-devel] GSoC 2010 is on
joe at ThrowingDice.com
Sat Apr 3 13:07:33 EDT 2010
At 12:03 PM 4/3/2010, Jakh Daven wrote:
>Thanks for the detailed reply. However, the same argument is valid
>for public groups isn't it? We have a unique constraint on
>(grp_owner, grp_name). So nothing stops both you and me from
>creating two public groups with the same name, "The New Jersey PHP
>User Group", for example. Socnet still has to differentiate between
>the two groups when showing them to a member of both the groups.
That's an issue for socnet. There is no core code to create a user-owned group.
>Other than that, I have upgraded to 184.108.40.206 and have been using it.
>IMHO we can have an option for the admin to set the group owner when
>creating/editing a group. Of course Socnet will set the user who
>creates a group as the group owner, but the admin should be able to
>change the owner by editing the group.
I left that function out on purpose. socnet might have other features
attached to a group that are very user specific. Likewise, if a group
is private, even an Admin should not be able to change who owns that
private group because it violates the privacy of the original creator.
>Will keep you posted as I delve deeper into the changes :)
Throwing Dice Games
No virus found in this outgoing message
Checked by PC Tools AntiVirus (220.127.116.11 - 10.004.176).
More information about the geeklog-devel