[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.7.1rc1 & looking ahead

[Rouslan Placella]

> Rouslan if you are going to work on some icons for us (that would be great)
> maybe a style/graphics guideline should be started. If you want, you could
> start one in the Geeklog Wiki that you and others could add to over time.
Ok, I'll look into doing this.


> I guess the first thing we need to do is get a full list of icons that need
> updating (default topics, command and control, print, edit, etc.). 
Good idea. Also I have a list of problems/issues that I have identified
while working on the icons. What is the best way to share this? Just
post in another message in this mailing list? Or maybe on the forum or
in the bug tracker?

Rouslan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
> Sent: October-12-10 4:17 PM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.7.1rc1 & looking ahead
> 
> Rouslan Placella wrote:
> 
> > If there are plans to continue improving the graphics, it would make
> > sense to have "Geeklog style guidelines". Because I'm a newbie in
> > open-source software development, I don't know how things work around
> > here and what is necessary for this (or if this is even necessary).
> 
> We don't really have any style guidelines. Regarding design, we're all
> amateurs here.
> 
> Simon Lord (who also designed the current Geeklog logo) was our "house
> artist" for a long time. This position has been vacant since Simon moved on.
> 
> 
> > As far as GL logo goes, I'm available to do work on it, if this is
> > required.
> 
> I don't really see the need for an entirely new logo - unless someone comes
> up with something fresh and convincing, of course. The current logo may need
> some retouching to better fit with whatever comes out of the efforts for a
> new site design.
> 
> 
> > One issue that I can see with the current logo is that
> > it is saved in a not-very-nice format: GIF.
> 
> That's because one of those amateurs (read: me) did that at one point and
> nobody has ever bothered to provide a better version. A higher-res version
> of the Geeklog logo is available here:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Geeklog-logo.png
> 
> bye, Dirk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5525 (20101012) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
>  
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5525 (20101012) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel