[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.8.0 release schedule
Rouslan Placella
rouslan at placella.com
Sun Mar 27 14:07:51 EDT 2011
Hmmm indeed...
I didn't foresee this problem at all when implementing plugin version
control. But yeah, after the version is fed to COM_versionConvert(),
1.8.0 becomes 1.8.0.0.3.0 and 1.8.0b1 becomes 1.8.0.0.1.0
So, as Dirk mentioned, the logic is correct when 1.8.0b1 < 1.8.0. I'm
guessing that we should update the plugin requirements to look for
1.8.0b1 for this beta release and then we look further into this issue
later and maybe create a way to override these settings.
Rouslan
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 13:35 -0400, Tom wrote:
> Hmmmm....
>
> >> So the plugins could indicate that they require 1.8.0b1 (or 1.8.0hg), but
> that looks odd
>
> I agree and it may confuse some users.
>
> I am not sure if this would work but could we make the new version check
> just worry about the 1.8.0 part and anything past the third number will be
> assumed to be compatible? This would mean no new features or DB changes
> could take place in a beta, service release, etc. I am not sure if this
> would work for how Geeklog JP distinguishes between their upgraded japan
> versions of some plugins though...
>
> Another idea would be to have a standard way for beta, service release and
> release candidate version numbers.
>
> For example if 1.8.0b## is found then it is assumed a beta and will consider
> 1.8.0 and 1.8.0b## to be compatible.
>
> We could then use sr for service release (1.8.0sr##) and rs for release
> candidate (or whatever we decide)
>
> I think I like the second idea better
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun
> Sent: March-27-11 12:33 PM
> To: Geeklog Development
> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.8.0 release schedule
>
> I ran into a tiny little last-minute problem ...
>
> I've set the Geeklog version number to 1.8.0b1. All the bundled plugins
> require Geeklog 1.8.0. Due to the new version check, however, they all
> refuse to install since 1.8.0b1 < 1.8.0
>
> Oops ...
>
> Not sure how to go from here. The comparison is correct - it's the data that
> isn't. So the plugins could indicate that they require 1.8.0b1 (or 1.8.0hg),
> but that looks odd, though it would be technically correct.
>
> Opinions?
>
> bye, Dirk
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
More information about the geeklog-devel
mailing list