[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update

[Tom]

That might be a good idea, especially if the new default theme gets included
(but I am not sure on the timeline for it).

 

Tom

 

From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
[mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Trinity
Sent: March-05-12 12:23 AM
To: Geeklog Development
Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update

 

What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since it
breaks compatibility with old plugins and having plug-in devs have pre and
post 2,0 plug-ins? I know you had at one time the Geeklog 2.0 thing but he
has since called it something else other than geeklog.

I know im not involved much anymore but i still keep tabs on geeklog dev. 

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:

I have a feeling that the 1.9.0 release will cause a lot of breakage,
especially with plugins. I've been running into all sorts of small issues
all morning .

For example, the Forum plugin fails to install due to the use of the 'tid'
field when adding a block. The MySQLi class is more picky about things than
the old MySQL class, which also seems to affect some plugins (including the
Polls plugin, which did call mysql_real_escape_string() directly in the
plugin upgrade code somewhere).

So we really need to get the plugin authors on board for this one.

We also need to make it really clear this time that there may be issues when
trying out early versions - including the risk of the site no longer working
due to plugin incompatibilities.

Any thoughts on how to best approach this?

bye, Dirk


--
http://www.themobilepresenter.com/

_______________________________________________
geeklog-devel mailing list
geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120305/87307ed8/attachment.html>