[geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?

[Trinity]

Perhaps the yahoo YUI2 Grids *CSS* style sheets could be useful for doing a
pure css multi column layout

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM, cordiste <cordiste at free.fr> wrote:

> Anyway, Rouslan and Yoshinori you have made very nice design.
>
> Ben
>
> 2012/3/14 cordiste <cordiste at free.fr>:
> > About the logo: the typo is very nice but my wish would be to abandon
> > the paper clip and paper because the logo as it stands is not easy to
> > integrate into a theme.
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > P.S : See a screenshot for newpro's theme
> > http://geeklog.fr/mediagallery/popup.php?s=20120314144340583
> >
> > 2012/3/14 Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net>:
> >>>> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
> >>
> >> The plan is to make it the default for Geeklog.net.  I am not sure
> about the
> >> actual install though since we have not discussed it yet. I personally
> would
> >> like to make it the default (though we would still include both themes
> in
> >> the install for now).
> >>
> >> For those of you who do not know, Rouslan is currently developing the
> new
> >> theme based on the look of the GL Version Test. You can see his
> progress by
> >> checking out the repository. The theme is currently called newpro.
> >>
> >> One question I have been meaning to ask as well is what shall we name
> the
> >> new theme?
> >>
> >>>> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
> >>
> >> We modified the current logo (slightly) about a year ago. I personally
> do
> >> not see the need to do it again especially when we have other graphic
> work
> >> that needs to be designed and  created (icons for new Topics, graphics
> for
> >> the new front page) . The new theme is also based on the colour pallet
> and
> >> look of the current logo.
> >>
> >> If you have ideas though there is no harm in submitting them.
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste
> >> Sent: March-14-12 8:50 AM
> >> To: Geeklog Development
> >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 or Geeklog 2.0.0?
> >>
> >> Is the newpro theme will be the default theme?
> >>
> >> If we go to version 2, can we have a new logo?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >>
> >> 2012/3/14 Dan Stoner <danstoner at gmail.com>:
> >>> I like 2.0 due all these reasons that Tom mentioned.
> >>>
> >>> - Dan Stoner
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Tom <websitemaster at cogeco.net> wrote:
> >>>> So what is the verdict here?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think we should go to 2.0.0 since:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -          We do break compatibilities with some plugins
> >>>>
> >>>> -          A new Theme is being included
> >>>>
> >>>> -          Major new features (child topics, passwords, etc.)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net
> >>>> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Vincent
> >>>> Furia
> >>>> Sent: March-05-12 2:34 PM
> >>>> To: Geeklog Development
> >>>> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 1.9.0 update
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I just did a quick google search for "Geeklog 2.0" and "Geeklog 2"
> >>>> and was surprised to see that both only had a few results that
> >>>> included AptitudeCMS stuff. None of the links were likely to be
> >>>> confusing. The first link for both searches were to the "Geeklog 2"
> >>>> topic on geeklog.net. If we rename that topic as we planned, I don't
> >> think the confusion would be that great.
> >>>> We could make that change even more "concrete" by changing the topic
> id.
> >>>>
> >>>> In any case, if we ever want to do a major version bump we'll have to
> >>>> deal with eventually. Also, we're now about two years since the last
> >>>> active AptitudeCMS development...
> >>>>
> >>>> -Vinny
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16, Dirk Haun <dirk at haun-online.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Trinity wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> What is the possibility of simply declaring this a 2.0 version since
> >>>>> it breaks compatibility with old plugins
> >>>>
> >>>> I had the same thought, actually, but decided not to bring it up
> >>>> myself because - I'm undecided. Jumping to 2.0 would make it clear
> >>>> that incompatibilities are to be expected. Not sure how much
> >>>> confusion this would cause, though, with all the high-flying plans
> >>>> for the other Geeklog 2.0 which can still be found all over the place
> >>>> (even though they are several years old by now). And I guess calling
> >>>> it 3.0 would be a bit of a stretch
> >>>> ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> bye, Dirk
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> http://www.themobilepresenter.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list
> >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> geeklog-devel mailing list
> >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geeklog-devel mailing list
> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geeklog-devel mailing list
> >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> geeklog-devel mailing list
> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net
> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/geeklog-devel/attachments/20120314/6a1e4cdb/attachment.html>